问题 选择题

下面语段中划线的成语,使用不恰当的一项是

莫言获得2012年诺贝尔文学奖后,成为了中国在国际文学大奖领域的始作俑者。广大网友对其议论纷纷,有挖苦、讽刺,有恶搞,当然更多的是祝贺、赞扬。面对网络媒体毁誉参半的议论,莫言泰然自若,首次在微博上做出回应:“感谢朋友们对我的肯定,也感谢朋友们对我的批评。在这个过程中,我看到了人心,也看到了我自己。”

A.始作俑者

B.议论纷纷

C.毁誉参半

D.泰然自若

答案

答案:A

题目分析:A.始作俑者:比喻首先做某件坏事的人。B. 议论纷纷:表明各种意见的言论多而杂乱,意见不一,说法众多。C.毁誉参半: 说坏话的合说好话的各占一半。表示对人的评价没有一致的意见。D.泰然自若:形容镇定,毫不在意的样子。

点评:成语题的答题技巧:第一,逐字解释成语,运用成语结构特点把握成语大意,但要注意不能望文生义;第二,体会成语的感情色彩;第三,要注意成语使用范围,搭配的对象;第四,尽可能找出句中相关联的信息。第五,四个选项权衡比较,选出认为最符合要求的。一般是选择正确的一项,但也得注意是不是选择不正确的一项。

选择题
问答题

Children in any society are expected to learn to conform to a number of social rules and expectations if they are to become participants in the culture. (46)Among the rules that children in our society are expected to learn are that certain classes of adults (such as teachers and doctors) are addressed by titles, that males and females use separate restroom facilities, and that women but not men wear dresses. These are examples of social conventions. In the absence of such a shared norm, the acts are neither right nor wrong. For this reason, conventions may be said to be arbitrary. For example, (47)we could just as easily have students address teachers by first names as have them call teachers by their last names and formal titles of Mr. or Ms.
Conventions, however, serve an important function by providing predictability and order to social life. (48)Without social conventions it would be impossible to organize social institutions such as schools, and societies as organized systems could not exist. The arbitrariness of conventions makes their importance difficult for children to figure out. (49) It is not until some time in adolescence that children come to fully understand the function that these arbitrary conventions serve to provide predictability and order to our social interactions.
In contrast with issues of convention are matters of morality. Morality refers to issues of human welfare, justice, and rights that are a function of the inherent features of interpersonal relations. Because of this, the right and wrong of moral actions are not simply determined by social consensus or the views of authority. For example, it is not possible to hit another person with force and not hurt the other person. Similarly, it is not possible to steal something valuable from someone else and not cause the person to experience the sense of loss. A moral judgment about unprovoked harm ( "It is wrong to hit") would not be dependent on the existence of a socially agreed upon rule or standard but could be generated solely from the intrinsic effects of the act (i.e., hitting hurts). (50)Similar analyses could be done regarding a broader range of issues that would extend beyond direct harm to concerns for what it means to be just, compassionate, and considerate of the rights of others.