问题 单项选择题

×年×月×日×时×分左右,××省××市××城二期住宅工程×栋工地发生一起施工升降机坠落事故,造成16人死亡、2人受伤。经调查,该工程建设单位为××置业有限公司,施工单位为××建设集团有限公司,监理单位为××建设监理有限公司,设备制造及租赁单位为××工程机械制造有限公司,设备安装单位为××安装工程有限责任公司。据初步分析,事故原因是由于前一天晚上将施工电梯擅自升高,第二天未经检测民工乘坐施工电梯至18层时发生坠落。
根据以上场景,回答下列问题:

依照《安全生产法》及《建设工程安全生产管理条例》的有关规定,应对该施工单位的安全生产工作全面负责的是( )。

A.施工单位的项目负责人

B.施工单位主要负责人

C.该工程监理总工程师

D.该工程建设单位主要负责人

E.施工单位的专职安全生产管理人员

答案

参考答案:B

解析: 通过事故调查分析,对事故的性质要有明确结论。其中对认定为自然事故(非责任事故或者不可抗拒的事故)的可不再认定或者追究事故责任人;对认定为责任事故的,要按照责任大小和承担责任的不同分别认定下列事故责任:
(1)直接责任者,即其行为与事故发生有直接责任的人员,如违章作业人员。
(2)主要责任者,即对事故发生负有主要责任的人员,如违章指挥者。
(3)领导责任者,即对事故发生负有领导责任的人员。

选择题
问答题

A couple of years ago a group of management scholars from Yale and the University of Pittsburgh tried to discover if there was a link between a company’s success and the personality of its boss. (46)To work out what that personality was, they asked senior managers to score their bosses for such traits as an ability to communicate an exciting vision of the future or to stand as a good model for others to follow. When the data were analyzed, the researchers found no evidence of a connection between how well a firm was doing and what its boss was like. As far as they could tell, a company could not be judged by its chief executive any better than a book could be judged by its cover.
(47)A few years before this, however, a team of psychologists from Tufts University, led by Nalini Ambady, discovered that when people watched two-second-long film-clips of professors lecturing, they were pretty good at determining how able a teacher each professor actually was.
Now, Dr Ambady and her colleague, Nicholas Rule, have taken things a step further. (48)They have shown that even a still photograph can convey a lot of information about competence—and that it can do so in a way which suggests the assessments of all those senior managers were nonsense.
Dr Ambady and Mr. Rule showed 100 undergraduates the faces of the chief executives of the top 25 and the bottom 25 companies in the Fortune 1,000 list. Half the students were asked how good they thought the person they were looking at would be at leading a company and half were asked to rate five personality traits on the basis of the photograph. (49) These traits were competence, dominance, likability, facial maturity (in other words, did the individual have an adult-looking face or a baby-face) and trustworthiness.
And Dr Ambady and Mr. Rule were surprised by just how accurate the students’ observations were. The results of their study, which are about to be published in Psychological Science, show that both the students’ assessments of the leadership potential of the bosses and their ratings for the traits of competence, dominance and facial maturity were significantly related to a company’s profits.
(50)Sadly, the characteristics of likability and trustworthiness appear to have no link to company profits, suggesting that when it comes to business success, being warm and fuzzy does not matter much (though these traits are not harmful).