问题 单项选择题

基坑开挖与支护设计应包括的内容为()。Ⅰ.支护体系方案的技术经济比较和选型Ⅱ.支护结构的强度,变形和稳定性验算Ⅲ.基坑内外土体的稳定性验算Ⅳ.基坑降水或止水帷幕设计及维护墙的抗渗设计Ⅴ.基坑开挖与地下水位变化引起的在坑内外土体的变形及其对基础桩,邻近建筑物和周边环境的影响Ⅵ.基坑开挖施工方法的可行性及基坑施工过程中的监测要求()

A.Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ

B.Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ、Ⅴ

C.Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ、Ⅵ

D.Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ、Ⅴ、Ⅵ

答案

参考答案:D

多项选择题

北京甲开发公司2009年通过公开招投标,确定向云南乙冶金公司购买铁矿石,并签订《铁矿石买卖合同》。合同约定,北京甲开发公司向云南乙冶金公司购买铁矿石2000吨,每吨150元,贷款30万元;履行时间为2010年9月~12月;每月l0日前按月均衡发货;贷款在收到货物后,于当月月末支付。北京甲开发公司向云南乙冶金公司支付合同定金5万元。合同约定,未尽事宜双方在合同履行中协商解决,协商不成,提交北京经济仲裁委员会解决。

2010年9月5日,云南乙冶金公司发货500吨,北京甲开发公司接收货物,并于9月末给付货款5万元。10月5日,云南乙冶金公司继续发货500吨,北京甲开发公司接收货物后未给付货款,10月末云南乙冶金公司几经催要,北京甲开发公司给付3万元货款,云南乙冶金公司提出异议,北京甲开发公司要求先以定金抵付货款。11月5日,云南乙冶金公司继续发货500吨,北京甲开发公司接收货物后,未给付货款。云南乙冶金公司几经催要货款无果后,12月没有继续发货。2011年,云南乙冶金公司在对货款追讨无望的情况下,向北京甲开发公司所在地人民法院起诉,要求北京甲开发公司给付货款,北京甲开发公司反诉云南乙冶金公司擅自解除合同,要求云南乙冶金公司承担合同未履行完毕的违约责任,并要求返还定金。 

关于合同中定金约定和使用的说法,正确的是()。

A.合同中定金数额的约定可以超过法律规定

B.定金是合同履行的担保,北京甲开发公司可以要求用定金抵9月的货款

C.北京甲开发公司应当给付云南乙冶金公司已供货的货款,无权要求返还定金

D.北京甲开发公司应当给付云南乙冶金公司已供货的货款,云南乙冶金公司返还定金

单项选择题

Good teachers matter. This may seem obvious to anyone who has a child in school or, for that matter, to anyone who has been a child in school. For a long time, though, researchers couldn’t actually prove that teaching talent was important. But new research finally shows that teacher quality is a close cousin to student achievement. A great teacher can cram one-and-a-half grades’ worth of learning into a single year, while laggards are lucky to accomplish half that much. Parents and kids, it seems, have been right all along to care whether they were assigned to Mrs. Smith or Mr. Brown.
Yet, while we know now that better teachers are critical, flaws in the way that administrators select and retain them mean that schools don’t always hire the best.
Many ingredients for good teaching are difficult to ascertain in advance—charisma and diligence come to mind—but research shows a teacher’s own ability on standardized tests reliably predicts good performance in the classroom. You would think, then, that top— scoring teachers would be swimming in job offers, right Not so, says Vanderbilt University professor Dale Ballou. High-scoring teaching applicants "do not fare better than others in the job market," he writes. "Indeed, remarkably they do somewhat worse. "
Even more surprising, given the national shortage of highly skilled math and science teachers, school administrators are more keen to hire education majors than applicants who have math or science degrees. No one knows for sure why those who hire teachers routinely overlook top talent. Perhaps they wrongly think that the qualifications they shun make little difference for students. Also, administrators are probably naturally drawn to teachers who remind them of themselves.
But failing to recognize the qualities that make teachers truly effective (and to construct incentives to attract and retain more of these top performers) has serious consequences. For example, because schools don’t always hire the best applicants, across-the-board salary increases cannot improve teacher quality much, and may even worsen it. That’s because higher salaries draw more weak as well as p applicants into teaching-applicants the current hiring system can’t adequately screen. Unless administrators have incentives to hire the best teachers available, it’s pointless to give them a larger group to choose from.
If public school hiring processes are bad, their compensation policies are worse. Most districts pay solely based on years of experience and the presence of a master’s degree, a formula that makes the Federal General Schedule—which governs pay for U. S. bureaucrats—look flexible. Study after study has shown that teachers with master’s degrees are no better than those without. Job experience does matter, but only for the first few years, according to research by Hoover Institution’s Eric A. Hanushek. A teacher with 15 years of experience is no more effective, on average, than a teacher with five years of experience, but which one do you think is paid more
This toxic combination of rigid pay and steep rewards for seniority causes average quality to decline rather than increase as teacher groups get older. Top performers often leave the field early for industries that reward their excellence. Mediocre teachers, on the other hand, are soon overcompensated by seniority pay. And because they are paid more than their skills command elsewhere, these less-capable pedagogues settle in to provide many years of ineffectual instruction.
So how can we separate the wheat from the chaff in the teaching profession To make American schools competitive, we must rethink seniority pay, the value of master’s degrees, and the notion that a teacher can teach everything equally well-especially math and science- without appropriate preparation in the subject.
Our current education system is unlikely to accomplish this dramatic rethinking. Imagine, for a moment, that American cars had been free in recent decades, while Toyotas and Hondas sold at full price. We’d probably be driving Falcons and Corvairs today. Free public education suffers from a lack of competition in just this way. So while industries from aerospace to drugs have transformed themselves in order to compete, public schooling has stagnated.
School choice could spark the kind of reformation this industry needs by motivating administrators to hire the best and adopt new strategies to keep top teachers in the classroom. The lesson that good teachers matter should be taught, not as a theory, but as a practice.

Which of the following CANNOT be concluded from the passage

A.Most average teachers want to leave school because of high pressure.

B.Excellent teachers often leave schools for better jobs.

C.The average quality of the teachers in America is declining.

D.Teachers’ quality is closely related to a number of factors.