问题 单项选择题


(每题所给选项中有一个或一个以上的正确答案,请在题后的括号内填入正确的选项)

郑良县拟新建一造纸厂,因建成后的造纸厂将排除有机毒液,排放时可能会影响周围环境,造纸厂筹建人员中有人建议先征得县环保部门同意,有人则认为“此造纸厂的建没已征得项目主管部门同意,没有必要再通过环保部门认可”。据此,请回答下列 1至3题:

新造纸厂建设完工后,造纸厂投产使用前必须做好下列哪些工作?( )

A.工程中防治污染的设施必须经原审批环境影响报告书的环保行政主管部门验收合格,该造纸厂才可投入生产、使用

B.工程中防治污染的设施必须经该造纸厂上级主管部门验收合格,才可投产、使用

C.工程中防治污染的设施必须经该造纸厂周边居民委员会或村民委员会验收合格,才可投产、使用

D.工程中防治污染的设施必须经所在地政府行政主管部门验收合格,才可投产、使用

答案

参考答案:A

解析: 根据《环境保护法》第26条第1款的规定,本题的正确选项应为A。

单项选择题
问答题

Read the argument and the instructions that follow it, and then make any notes that will help you plan your response. Write your response on a separate sheet of paper. If possible, type your essay on a word processor.
An economist addressed the following statement to a group of economists and policy makers:
Our federal government often employs subsidies and trade measures to protect the well-being of certain traditional industries, such as steel production and agriculture, because these industries have been seen as vital to the nation’s interests. In recent decades, however, the nation’s economy has grown far more from the development of newer, information-oriented industries such as pharmaceuticals, computer technology, and media. These newer industries promise more growth in personal income and tax revenue than do the older industries, and they are generally less harmful to the environment. It is wrong, therefore, for the federal government to protect and subsidize traditional industries such as steel and agriculture, when such protectionist practices may delay workers in these traditional industries from moving to newer sectors of the economy that can offer greater benefits to workers and to the nation as a whole.
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion, be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative examples or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.