搜题请搜索小程序“爱下问搜题”
问题 单项选择题 A1/A2型题

测量血管最准确的CT后处理是（）。

A.MPR

B.SSD

C.MIP

D.VR

E.CTVE

答案

参考答案：C

解析：基础常识。最大密度投影（MIP）处理后血管径线的测量相对最可靠，目前多以此为标准来衡量血管的扩张或狭窄。

阅读理解与欣赏

　　[甲]山不在高，有仙则名。水不在深，有龙则灵。斯是陋室，惟吾德馨。苔痕上阶绿，草色入帘青。谈笑有鸿儒，往来无白丁。可以调素琴，阅金经。无丝竹之乱耳，无案牍之劳形。南阳诸葛庐，西蜀子云亭。孔子云：何陋之有？

　　[乙]水陆草木之花，可爱者甚蕃。晋陶渊明独爱菊。自李唐来，世人甚爱牡丹。予独爱莲之出淤泥而不染，濯清涟而不妖，中通外直，不蔓不枝，香远益清，亭亭净植，可远观而不可亵玩焉。

　　予谓菊，花之隐逸者也；牡丹，花之富贵者也；莲，花之君子者也。噫！菊之爱，陶后鲜有闻。莲之爱，同予者何人？牡丹之爱，宜乎众矣。

1．下列划线词语解释有误的一项是[ ]

A．谈笑有鸿儒（博学的人）

B．可爱者甚蕃（多）

C．其两膝相比者（靠近）

D．浑欲不胜簪（混乱）

2．译句。

（1）（莲）出淤泥而不染，濯清涟而不妖：________________。

（2）（岛）时时引手作推敲之势：____________________。

3．简答。

（1）甲文中统领全文，彰显作者品德的语句是：___________________。

（2）乙文中多次提到菊和牡丹．其作用是：______________________。

4．下列句子朗读节奏划分不正确的一项是[ ]

A．山 / 不在高，有/ 仙则名。

B．盖／简桃核修狭者／为之。

C．有孙／母／未去，出入／无／完裙

D．可 / 远观 / 而不可 / 亵玩焉。
查看答案
问答题

Read the argument and the instructions that follow it, and then make any notes that will help you plan your response. Write your response on a separate sheet of paper. If possible, type your essay on a word processor.
A speaker at an electronic entertainment conference made the following statement:
Video games have been widely criticized for having a negative effect on the nation’s youth. If one looks at the facts, however, over the last 25 years, the period in which the use of video games became common among the nation’s youth, math scores on the most commonly used college aptitude test have risen consistently and entry-level salaries for college graduates have also risen significantly. This evidence suggests that video games are actually providing young people with the skills they need to succeed in college and in the workplace.
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion, be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative examples or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.
查看答案