问题 完形填空

Teenagers who spend hours in front of the television may have a poorer diet, a new study shows. It is not clear, researchers say, whether television itself is the reason, but it is possible that things like snacking in front of the TV or seeing ads for junk food influence young people’s diets.

The study included nearly 1,400 high school students. It showed that those who watched TV for five hours or more every day had less healthy diets than other students five years later. As a group, they ate fewer fruits and vegetables, but ate more fast food, snack products and fried foods.

“We’re not able to tell why,” lead researcher Dr. Daheia J. Barr-Anderson said. “But we have some speculation(推测).” People who spend a lot of time in front of the TV, especially teenagers, may have more snacks. It may influence their long-term diet quality. It’s also possible that TV ads for fast food, sweets and snacks make teenagers eat more of those foods. TV time might also replace exercise time for some kids.

The researchers found a clear relationship between TV time during high school and diet quality of the young. The heaviest TV viewers ate the most junk food five years later, and those who’d watched fewer than two hours every day had the most fruits and vegetables.

According to Barr-Anderson, the findings support experts’ advice that children should watch no more than two hours of television every day. “Parents should cut the TV time.” Barr-Anderson said. She advised that parents set a good example by eating right, being physically active and controlling their own TV time.

小题1:Is it clear that television is the reason for young people’s poor diet?

(no more than 3word)

(2 marks)

小题2:What kind of TV ads will makes teenagers eat more unhealthy food?

(no more than 10 words)

(2 marks)                                                            

小题3:According to Barr-Anderson, what should parents do to set a good example for their children? (no    more    than    15  words)                                                   (3 marks)                                                                                                                                              

小题4:What is the passage mainly about?  (no more than 10 words)            

(3 marks)

答案

小题1:No

小题2:TV ads for fast food, sweets and snacks

小题3:They should eat right, be physically active and control their own TV time.

小题4:The relationship between TV time and diet quality.

题目分析:

小题1:细节题:从第一段的句子:It is not clear, researchers say, whether television itself is the reason, 可知答案是No

小题2:细节题;从第二段的句子:As a group, they ate fewer fruits and vegetables, but ate more fast food, snack products and fried foods.可知答案是 TV ads for fast food, sweets and snacks

小题3:从文章的最后一句话:She advised that parents set a good example by eating right, being physically active and controlling their own TV time.

可知是要求父母:They should eat right, be physically active and control their own TV time.

小题4:主旨题:文章的主题是看电视时间和饮食质量的关系:The relationship between TV time and diet quality.

点评:阅读表达首先通读全文,掌握文章大意,再结合问题在文章中找出相应的句子,回答问题要注意字数限制,也要注意语法的正确使用。

填空题
问答题

(2006年)   案情:老方创作的纪实小说《村支书的苦与乐》,以某县吴村村支部书记吴某为原型进行创作,其中描述了他与村霸林申(以林甲为原型)之间斗智斗勇的冲突场面。小说在《山南海北》杂志发表后,林甲认为小说将村支书作为正义的化身进行描述,将自己作为“村霸”进行刻画,侵犯其名誉权。林甲起诉老方,请求赔偿经济损失2万元并赔礼道歉。   法院受理本案后,追加杂志社为共同被告。由于林甲死亡,法院变更其子林乙为原告,其后又准许林乙将请求赔偿经济损失的数额变更为3万元。一审过程中,被告提出了当地镇党委处理林甲相关问题的决定(档案材料)作为证据,证明小说的描述有事实根据。一审判决认为,镇党委办公室虽然给老方提供了处理决定(档案材料),但并未明确同意可据此创作小说,故该材料不能作为证据;同时认为,杂志社编辑与作家老方和林甲虽不认识,难以核实有关事实,但也不能免除侵权责任,故认定老方和杂志社构成侵权,判决赔偿经济损失3万元,并在《山南海北》上刊登小说情节失实的声明以消除影响。判决未涉及赔礼道歉的问题。   林乙、老方和杂志社均提出了上诉,二审法院经过书面审查,未接触当事人,直接裁定撤销原判发回重审。一审法院经过重审,判决支持了原告的全部诉讼请求,双方当事人均未再提出上诉。老方和杂志社在判决确定的期限内履行了赔偿义务,但拒绝赔礼道歉。   问题:

林乙在诉讼结束后能否另案起诉,请求老方赔偿精神损害?为什么?