搜题请搜索小程序“爱下问搜题”
问题 选择题

下列各句中加点的成语，使用恰当的一项是( )

A．为了纪念“邓 * * 诞辰一百周年”，新落成的“ * * 故居”于2003年“十·一”向游人开放，前往参观的人不绝如缕。

B．为了攻克研制火箭新型燃料的技术难关，全体科研人员殚精竭虑，反复试验，无所不用其极，终于获得了成功。

C．在繁忙而紧张的高三学习中，父母见微知著的关怀，老师循循善诱的教导，使同学们倍受感动和鼓舞。

D．刚工作时，他可谓“劣迹斑斑”，迟到、早退、打架，不一而足；现在，他已是单位的“先进职工”了。这不正印证了“过而能改，善莫大焉”的古训吗？

答案

答案：D

A不绝如缕：形容声音细微悠长或情势危急。（此处属于使用对象不当）B无所不用其极：做坏事的时候什么手段都使出来。（此处属于感情色彩不当）C见微知著：见到事情的苗头，就能知道它的实质和发展趋势。（此处属于望文生义）D不一而足：不是一种或一次，而是很多。

多项选择题 案例分析题

患者，28岁，女性，初产妇，孕32周，双胎，阵发性腹痛2小时， * * 少量出血1小时就诊。

提示：住院后经治疗腹痛明显减轻。此后恰当的处理有哪些()

A.立即剖宫产

B.抗生素预防感染

C.卧床，抬高臀部

D.抑制宫缩

E.促胎肺成熟、促胎儿生长

F.继续应用止痛、止血药
查看答案
单项选择题

Questions 1～5


Writing articles about films for The Front Page was my first proper job. Before then I had done bits of reviewing—novels for other newspapers, films for a magazine and anything I was asked to do for the radio. That was how I met Tom Seaton, the first arts editor of The Front Page, who had also written for radio and television. He hired me, but Tom was not primarily a journalist, or he would certainly have been more careful in choosing his staff.
At first, his idea was that a team of critics should take care of the art forms that didn’t require specialized knowledge: books, TV, theatre, film and radio. There would be a weekly lunch at which we would make our choices from the artistic material that Tom had decided we should cover, though there would also be guests to make the atmosphere sociable.
It all felt a bit of a dream at that time: a new newspaper, and I was one of the team. It seemed so unlikely that a paper could he introduced into a crowded market. It seemed just as likely that a millionaire wanted to help me personally, and was pretending to employ me. Such was my lack of self-confidence. In fact, the first time I saw someone reading the newspaper on the London Underground, then turning to a page on which one of my reviews appeared, I didn’t know where to look.
Tom’s original scheme for a team of critics for the arts never took off. It was a good idea, but we didn’t get together as planned and so everything was done by phone. It turned out, too, that the general public out there preferred to associate a reviewer with a single subject area, and so I chose film. Without Tom’s initial push, though, we would hardly have come up with the present arrangement, by which I write an extended weekly piece, usually on one film.
The space I am given allows me to broaden my argument—or forces me, in an uninteresting week, to make something out of nothing. But what is my role in the public arena I assume that people choose what films to go to on the basis of the stars, the publicity or the director. There is also such a thing as loyalty to "type" or its opposite. It can only rarely happen that someone who hates westerns buys a ticket for one after reading a review, or a love story addict avoids a romantic film because of what the papers say.
So if a film review isn’t really a consumer guide, what is it I certainly don’t feel I have a responsibility to be "right" about a movie. Nor do I think there should be a certain number of "great" and "bad" films each year. All I have to do is put forward an argument. I’m not a judge, and nor would I want to be.

What does the author mean when he says that Tom’s scheme "never took off" (para. 4) ______

A. It was unpopular.
B. It wasted too much time.
C. It wasn’t planned properly.
D. It wasn’t put into practice.
查看答案