问题 写作题

请以“我的花儿为你开”为题写一篇不少于800字的文章。

答案

我的花儿为你开

我的花儿为你开。五十六个民族,五十六朵花,五十六个兄弟姐妹是一家,五十六种语言,汇成一句话,互相关爱,互相忍耐,为你开出一朵美丽的花!假如人人都能为他人开出一朵花,世界将变成美好的人间。

我的花儿为你开。人生就如一次漫长而又短促的旅行,在旅途中,总有一些坎坷,困难……然而面对这些困难,有些人是难以克服的,这时就需要别人为他开出一朵救助的花。为别人开一朵花儿是冬天里你给人一个太阳;为别人开一朵花是夏天里,你给人一阵微风;为别人开一朵花儿是秋天里,你给人丰硕的果实;为别人开一朵花是春天里,你给人一缕阳光……

我的花儿为你开,为你开一朵友谊的花儿。做你悲伤时倾诉的对象,做你分享快乐的同伴,做你愤怒时的出气筒……为你开一朵友谊的花,为自己构造一座通向友情天堂的桥梁。对你诚心相待,友善相处,你也会对我报之以礼,因此我们就可能成为一生的挚友或知己。

我的花儿为你开,为你开一朵奉献的花。学鲁迅先生“俯首甘为孺子牛”,学周 * * 鞠躬尽瘁,死而后已;学孔繁森将自己的一生奉献于阿里……开一朵奉献之花等于为自己的心构造一幢美丽的房子,在这个房子里,我可以做善良奉献者,我可以做爱的形象大使,为人们献出自己的力量。

我的花儿为你开,为你开一朵感恩的花。开一朵感恩的花,才会在生活中发现美好,用微笑去对待每一天,用微笑去对待世界,对待人生,对待朋友,对待困难。开一朵感恩的花可以化腐朽为神奇,化冰峰为春暖,化干戈为玉帛。

我的花儿为你开。一次受伤后的救助是一朵花,一次善意的批评是一朵花,一次碰撞后的忍让是一朵花,一句亲切的问候是一朵花,一句“对不起”是一朵花,一句“谢谢你”是一朵花,在这些缤纷多彩的世界中,我愿意为你开出一朵美丽的花。

“这朵花儿既能令你芬芳,也能令别人快乐,能为别人开花的心是善良的心,能为他人的缤纷而赞美诗真诚的情,能为他人的生活绚丽而付出的人是不寻常的人,记住!我的花儿为你开!

当你正为困难而愁怏的时候,这时如果你冷静地欣赏车外的风景时,你会意外的发现路边的花儿正为你开放,它们会给你温暖,给你帮助,当你被帮助之后,你应为别人开一朵感谢的花。

题目分析:本题是一则命题作文,审题时要注意到,这是一个富有诗意的题目,揭开诗意的面纱,我们看到的是命题人对“付出”的期望,对和谐世界的呼唤。一次善意的批评是一朵花,一次碰撞后的忍让是一朵花,一句亲切的问候是一朵花,对父母的感恩是一朵花……所以可以选取一个个细节,一幅幅画面来诠释“我”的花儿有多红,有多艳,有多香!为别人开一朵花,带去“我”的宽容,“我”的理解,“我”的温暖,“我”的智慧,“我”的阳光……这个世界因“我”小小的举动而有了生机,有了绿色,有了温暖,“我”成了这个世界一道亮丽的风景……题目中你可以是具体的也可以是抽象的;可以指具体的一个人,也可以是一个群体,甚至可以是自己的灵魂。写作此文可以通过一个完整的故事娓娓叙述中释放“我”的花香,也可以通过诗意的语言,散文的自由让“我”的花儿浪漫而富有情调,也可以用议论文的文体,观点明确,旗帜鲜明,旁征博引,用例典型,体现考生的理性思考,体现考生对生活深刻的认识。

单项选择题

The questions in this group are based on the content of a passage. After reading the passage, choose the best answer to each question. Answer all questions following the passage on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage.

Pretty much everybody agrees that clean air is a good thing, right Evidently not so. Since the 1960s, when people started talking about clean air in the first place, the American energy industry, which includes coal companies, oil companies, and utility companies, has dragged its heels on every initiative to improve the quality of the air we breathe. Even after the Clean Air Act of 1970 and its amendments in 1977 and 1990 made it clear that controlling air pollution is a national priority, these companies have found tricks and loopholes to avoid compliance.

Perhaps the most egregious loophole is the one that allows older power plants to disregard limits on sulfux dioxide emissions until they undergo a major renovation, at which point they have to comply. Sulfur dioxide from coal-burning power plants is the primary cause of acid rain in North America. The Clean Air Act states that when coal-burning power plants upgrade their equipment, they must then comply with sulfur dioxide limitations by either installing scrubbing equipment that cleans the emissions or using fuel with lower sulfur content. The law tied the timing of compliance to major renovations in order to give power plants a grace period in which to comply. Many power plants, however, have exploited a loophole in this law by instituting a series of "minor" renovations that, in effect, upgrade their equipment without requiring them to comply with the Clean Air Act. Some plants have cheated the system by undergoing "minor" renovations for decades.

The power companies claim that they have to resort to these underhanded measures because the cost of compliance with the Clean Air Act is too high. And if everyone else is cheating the system, why should they have to install costly sulfur dioxide scrubbers

This cost argument falls apart upon scrutiny. Since 1977, more than 400 power plants across the country have managed to comply with the restrictions and are still making money. The sulfur dioxide scrubbing equipment has turned out to be far less expensive than the power industry naysayers claimed it would be. Many power plants have even complied with the emissions limits and reduced their operating costs by switching from high-sulfur Appalachian coal to the low-sulfur coal produced in western states such as Wyoming and Idaho. Western coal is not only cleaner than eastern coal, but also, because it is generally closer to the surface, as much as 30 percent less expensive to extract.

Clearly, the costs of compliance with the Clean Air Act can be justified, but if these companies were honest, such justifications would not have to be made. If they were honest, they would acknowledge the costs of not complying: the health costs of increased rates of asthma and lung cancer in high-emissions areas; the environmental costs of acid-scarred forests and lakes; the aesthetic costs of a haze of sulfur dioxide cutting visibility across the eastern United States to only half of what it was in pre-industrial times. When you look at the true costs you have to ask, is any cost too high for clean air

According to the information given in the passage, sulfur dioxide emissions are linked to all except which of the following phenomena ?()

A. Reduced visibility in the eastern United States

B. Damage to the ozone hole

C. Increased rates of asthma

D. Acid rain

E. Damaged forests

单项选择题