The Bush administration is about to propose far-reaching new rules that would give people with disabilities greater access to tens of thousands of courtrooms, swimming pools, golf courses, stadiums, theaters, hotels and retail stores. The proposal would substantially update and rewrite federal standards for enforcement of the Americans With Disabilities Act, a landmark civil rights law passed with p bipartisan support in 1990. The new rules would set more stringent requirements in many areas and address some issues for the first time, in an effort to meet the needs of an aging population and growing numbers of disabled war veterans.
More than seven million businesses and all state and local government agencies would be affected. The proposal includes some exemptions for parts of existing buildings, but any new construction or renovations would have to comply. The new standards would affect everything from the location of light switches to the height of retail service counters, to the use of monkeys as "service animals" for people with disabilities, which would be forbidden’.
The White House approved the proposal in May after a five-month review. It is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on Tuesday, with 60 days for public comment. After considering those comments, the government would issue final rules with the force of law. Already, the proposal is stirring concern. The United States Chamber of Commerce says it would be onerous and costly, while advocates for disabled Americans say it does not go far enough.
Since the disability law was signed by the first President Bush, advances in technology have made services more available to people with disabilities. But Justice Department officials said they were still receiving large numbers of complaints. In recent months, the federal government has settled lawsuits securing more seats for disabled fans at Madison Square Garden in New York and at the nation’s largest college football stadium, at the University of Michigan.
The Justice Department acknowledged that some of the changes would have significant costs. But over all, it said, the value of the public benefits, estimated at $ 54 billion, exceeds the expected costs of $ 23 billion. In an economic analysis of the proposed rules, the Justice Department said the need for an accessible environment was greater than ever because the Iraq war was "creating a new generation of young men and women with disabilities". John L. Wodatch, chief of the disability rights section of the Justice Department, said："Disability is inherent in the human condition. The vast majority of individuals who are fortunate enough to reach an advanced age will benefit from the proposed requirements.
What do we learn about the Bush administration’s proposal of new rules（）
A. It is made on behalf of the aging people and disabled former army men
B. It is a revised edition of the Americans With Disabilities Act
C. It is a landmark civil rights law with the supports from both Parties
D. It is the first proposal setting stricter requirement for some issues
参考答案：A
解析：
[考点] 事实细节
此题考查对原文相关细节的准确理解。四个选项需要逐一判别。根据题干提示，需要审视文章第一段。第一段的结论句提及the new rules would...in an effort to meet the needs of an aging population and...disabled war veterans，文中in an effort to meet the needs of(为了满足 ……的需求)对应A选项中的on behalf of(为了……的利益)；an aging population(老龄人口)对应着A选项中的the aging people(老龄化的人)；disabled war veterans(残疾老兵)对应着A选项中的disabled former army men(残疾退伍军人)。可以得知A选项与原文吻合，因此正确。
[干扰项分析] B选项是对原文的曲解，原文内容为the proposal...rewrite federal standards for enforcement of the Americans With Disabilities Act，说明该提案会改写《美国残疾人法案》的执行标准，而不是修订法案本身，该选项措辞不妥。C选项内容在原文中修饰的是老布什签署的《美国残疾人法案》，而不是当前小布什的提案。D选项是一个拼凑的选项，在原文中，the first time修饰的是address some issues，stringent requirements的范围是many areas，该选项改变了原文信息的搭配关系，偷梁换柱，张冠李戴，属干扰项。