问题 单项选择题

The telecommunications, pharmaceutical, and airline industries all have undergone radical changes in recent years. Pharmaceutical companies, which once sold drugs to the doctors that dispensed them, switched to the solution-selling method and started dealing with health-care companies. And many major airlines consolidated at the same time that low-cost firms like Jet Blue entered the market.

In each of these industries, the game changed, and with new rules came new ways to win. That is the premise of Harvard Business School’s "Changing the Game. Negotiation and Competitive Decision Making." The program, which covers not only deal-making but also topics as diverse as online auctions and strategic partnerships, "is for companies that are going through fundamental change in the way things are done," says Max Bazerman, program chair and professor of business administration at the school.

This is not a program for novices, says Bazerman; most participants have already attended a general negotiation program. In "Changing the Game," participants learn to understand their thought processes regarding negotiation, to compare rational and intuitive decision-making strategies, and to identify common mistakes made by even the most experienced professionals. By focusing on competitive environments, the program draws on some of the most advanced concepts from the emerging areas of behavioral economics, behavioral decision research, and behavioral finance.

Participants engage in simulated negotiations that highlight the tension between creating and assessing value, and learn how to think about both simultaneously. The soup-to-nuts simulations encompass preparation, team building, negotiating, and feedback, as well as the development of a conceptual structure for thinking about negotiations more rationally. Participants then apply that structure in their critiques of several large-scale negotiation cases. Ultimately participants apply their newly-honed analytic skills to their own companies and critique of past negotiations.

Negotiations can take many forms, of course. Bazerman notes that auctions are becoming increasingly common. Thanks to a renewed focus on driving clown costs, auctions have emerged as a valuable way for buyers to exert maximum leverage (although the course offers advice to sellers as well). Here again, coursework focuses both on analysis of case studies and on simulations that give participants a chance to roll up their sleeves and put themselves to the test.

"Max’s approach is more pragmatic than other programs I’ve taken," says Gerry Dully, senior vice president of global marketing and logistics at Methanex, a producer of methanol based in Vancouver. "Looking at my prior experience, I could see what mistakes I made, and I’m more conscious of them now. The course had a profound impact on how I’ve modified my behavior in negotiating situations.

Gerry Dully is()

A. a friend of the program chair Max Bazerman

B. a participant in the program

C. a professor who teaches at the program

D. a company leader who is an expert in negotiation

答案

参考答案:B

解析:

从Gerry Duffy说的话来看,他显然是在作为这个培训项目的一名学员谈自己的学习体会。

单项选择题
单项选择题

五、根据所给的资料。回答下列问题。


9月份,工业品出厂价格同比上涨2.7%,原材料、燃料、动力购进价格上涨3.6%。
在工业品出厂价格中,生产资料出厂价格同比上涨2.5%。其中,采掘工业上涨1.2%,原料工业上涨4.2%,加工工业上涨1.8%。生活资料出厂价格同比上涨3.3%。其中,食品类价格上涨 8.2%,衣着类上涨1.0%,一般日用品类上涨1.9%,耐用消费品类下降0.7%。
分品种看:
原油出厂价格同比下降3.9%。成品油中的汽油和柴油出厂价格分别下降5.2%和0.2%,煤油价格上涨0.9%。
化工产品价格类中,聚苯乙烯价格同比上涨5.7%,顺丁橡胶下降0.4%,涤纶长丝下降 4.3%。
煤炭开采和洗选业出厂价格同比上涨4.5%。其中,原煤出厂价格上涨4.1%。
黑色金属冶炼及压延加工业出厂价格同比上涨9.5%。其中,普通大型钢材上涨8.5%,普通中型钢材上涨13.1%,普通小型钢材上涨17.9%,线材上涨8.9%,中厚钢板上涨11.6%。
有色金属冶炼及压延加工业出厂价格同比上涨11.9%。其中,铜、铝、铅、锌的出厂价格涨幅在0.6%-46.9%之间。
此外,在原材料、燃料、动力购进价格中,燃料动力类、有色金属材料类和化工原料类购进价格同比分别上涨1.9%、5.0%和2.8%,黑色金属材料类上涨7.2%。
1-9月份累计,工业品出厂价格比去年同期上涨2.7%,原材料、燃料、动力购进价格上涨 3.8%。

下列选项中,出厂价格同比上涨最大的是( ),同比下降最多的是( )。

A.普通中型钢材 耐用消费品类

B.普通小型钢材 汽油

C.中厚钢板 涤纶长丝

D.食品类 汽油