问题

丝绸之路示意图,回答下列问题。

(1)写出丝绸之路的具体路线。

___________________________________________________________________

(2)它出现在什么时期?在我国历史上有哪些作用?

___________________________________________________________________

(3)西域是指我国今天的什么地区?西域与丝绸之路的关系怎样?

___________________________________________________________________

答案

(1)长安—河西走廊—西亚、中亚、南亚—大秦。

(2)西汉  它加强了中西联系,促进了东西方之间经济文化交流。

(3)新疆;丝绸之路通过西域,西域设置的都护府为丝绸之路的畅通提供了可靠的保证。

综合题
单项选择题

If there is one thing scientists have to hear, it is that the game is over. Raised on the belief of an endless voyage of discovery, they recoil from the suggestion that most of the best things have already been located. If they have, today’s scientists can hope to contribute no more than a few grace notes to the symphony of science.

A book to be published in Britain this week, The End of Science, argues persuasively that this is the case. Its author, John Horgan, is a senior writer for Scientific American magazine, who has interviewed many of today’s leading scientists and science philosophers. The shock of realizing that science might be over came to him, he says, when he was talking to Oxford mathematician and physicist Sir Roger Penrose.

The End of Science provoked a wave of denunciation in the United States last year. "The reaction has been one of complete shock and disbelief, "Mr. Horgan says.

The real question is whether any remaining unsolved problems, of which there are plenty, lend themselves to universal solutions. If they do not, then the focus of scientific discovery is already narrowing. Since the triumphs of the 1960s—the genetic code, plate tectonics, and the microwave background radiation that went a long way towards proving the Big Bang—genuine scientific revolutions have been scarce. More scientists are now alive, spending more money on research, that ever. Yet most of the great discoveries of the 19th and 20th centuries were made before the appearance of state sponsorship, when the scientific enterprise was a fraction of its present size.

Were the scientists who made these discoveries brighter than today’s That seems unlikely. A far more reasonable explanation is that fundamental science has already entered a period of diminished returns. "Look, don’t get me wrong," says Mr Horgan. "There are lots of important things still to study, and applied science and engineering can go on for ever. I hope we get a cure for cancer, and for mental disease, though there are few real signs of progress.

John Horgan().

Ⅰ. has published a book entitled The End of Science

Ⅱ. has been working as an editor of Scientific American

Ⅲ. has been working many years as a literary critic

Ⅳ. is working as a science writer

A. Ⅰ and Ⅱ

B. Ⅰ

C. Ⅰ and Ⅳ

D. Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅳ