问题 单项选择题

Whether to teach young children a second language is disputed among teachers, researchers and pushy parents. On the one hand, acquiring a new tongue is said to be far easier when young. On the other, teachers complain that children whose parents speak a language at home that is different from the one used in the classroom sometimes struggle in their lessons and are slower to reach linguistic milestones. Would a 15-month-old child, they wonder, not be better off going to music classes

A study just published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences may help resolve this question by getting to the point of what is going on in a bilingual child’s brain, how a second language affects the way he thinks, and thus in what circumstances being bilingual may be helpful. Agnes Kovacs and Jacques Mehler at the International School for Advanced Studies in Trieste say that some aspects of the cognitive development of infants raised in a bilingual household must be undergoing acceleration in order to manage which of the two languages they are dealing with.

The aspect of cognition in question is part of what is termed the brain’s “executive function”. This allows people to organise, plan, prioritise activity, shift their attention from one thing to another and suppress habitual responses. Bilingualism is common in Trieste which, though Italian, is almost surrounded by Slovenia. So Dr. Kovacs and Dr. Mehler looked at 40 “preverbal” seven-month-olds, half raised in monolingual and half in bilingual households, and compared their performances in a task that needs control of executive function.

First, the babies were trained to expect the appearance of a puppet on a screen after they had heard a set of meaningless words invented by the researchers. Then the words, and the location of the puppet, were changed. When this was done, the babies who speak only one language had difficulty overcoming their learnt response, even when the researchers gave them further clues that a switch had taken place. The bilingual babies, however, found it far easier to switch their attention — counteracting the previously learnt, but no longer useful response.

Monitoring languages and .keeping them separate is part of the brain’s executive function, so these findings suggest that even before a child can speak, a bilingual environment may speed up that function’s development. Before rushing your offspring into bilingual kindergartens, though, there are a few cautions. For one thing, these extraordinary cognitive benefits have been demonstrated so far only in “crib” bilinguals — those living in households where two languages are spoken routinely. The researchers speculate that it might be the fact of having to learn two languages in the same setting that requires greater use of executive function. So whether those benefits apply to children who learn one language at home, and one at school, remains unclear.

The new study concluded that being bilingual is found helpful()

A. only when you use a foreign language to talk with foreigners

B. only when you have to learn two languages in the same setting

C. only when you speak different languages in school and at home

D. only when you speak foreign languages both in school and at home

答案

参考答案:B

解析:

[设题点] 人物引言处

事实细节题。本题问在什么情况下双语环境才有益。首先观察四个选项。[A]提到的talk with foreigners在文中未提及,所以可以排除。[C]提到,“在家和在学校说两种不同的语言”,而文章第一段,已经有老师抱怨这种模式的缺点,很显然[C]也错误。[D]中的“在家和在学校都说外语”,这样就不再是双语环境了,更无处谈起双语环境的益处。只有[B]“在同样的环境中必须学习两种语言”是正确的。文章举了意大利的一个城市“的里雅斯特”为例,这里的家庭大部分都是双语环境,所以孩子们不得不学习两种语言。文章最后一段倒数第二句,研究者也给出了自己的观点“只有在不得不在同一环境中学习两种语言的情况下”。因此,本题答案为[B]。

阅读理解与欣赏

阅读下文,回答问题。

非典型性肺炎

2003年,有一个词语让中国人听起来曾一度感到恐慌,那就是“非典”。这种疾病并非2003年才新出现,也并非中国才有。在此之前,人们对“非典”十分陌生,加之此次在中国流行的“非典”的病原体是以前从未见过的新的病毒,面对突如其来的流行疾病,人们显得束手无策。没有现成的治疗方案;没有有效的冶疗药物,传统的抗菌药物治疗无明显效果;没有有效的预防手段,最有效的手段就是隔离。

“非典”是非典型性肺炎的简称。开始发作时有流感一样的症状,如发烧、咳嗽、头痛等;但体温一般超过38度,多为干咳少痰,偶有血丝,有时伴有畏寒。感冒一般没有肺炎的迹象,而“非典”有明显的肺炎迹象。但它又不同于由肺炎链球菌等常见的细菌引起的大叶性肺炎或支气管肺炎等典型性肺炎,它主要是由流感病毒、支原体、衣原体、腺病毒或其他较不寻常的微生物所引起的肺炎,它的传染力强多了。除了上述症状外,“非典”还伴有关节酸痛、乏力、腹泻,有时胸闷、气促或明显呼吸窘迫等症状。

各国科研人员通力合作,终于正式确认冠状病毒的一个变种是引起此次流行的“非典”的病原体。这种病毒能在人体内繁殖,伤害自身组织,破坏免疫系统,也可能引发无数并发症,致使患者的病情急剧恶化。它可以在体外存活3-6小时。现在的证据显示,“非典”是经飞沫传播的,病毒在飞沫(口水珠)内。由于水珠比空气重,所以病毒只会停留在三尺范围内的物体表面;另外,接触患者呼吸道分泌物或接触已有病毒的物体表面,然后接触自己的黏膜(眼、口、鼻),也会感染。“非典”病毒的潜伏期一般为2-12天(通常为3-5天),潜伏期的患者一般不会传染,病症一般会维持10-14天。

“非典”并非无法可疗。事实上,现阶段医学已有新突破,在治疗过程中已获很高的成功率。专家认为,保持环境空气的流通;注意个人卫生,勤洗手;保持心情愉快;加强锻炼,增强自身的免疫能力;尽量不与病人接触,是可以有效地预防“非典”的。

对未知的恐惧,莫过于人群对出现流行病的反应那样,表现得淋漓尽致,当流行疾病的原因不明时尤其如此。随着对“非典”的深入了解,人们的恐惧感会慢慢降低,正如人们对艾滋病的恐惧一样。

1、“非典”曾一度让中国人感到恐惧,下列不属于恐惧的原因的一项是(  )

A.它的传染力很强,三尺范围以内的人可以直接受到感染。

B.此次流行的“非典”的病原体是以前从未见过的新的病毒。

C.没有有效的治疗药物,传统的抗菌药物治疗无明显的效果。

D.最有效的预防手段是隔离,而人们害怕隔离的孤单。

2、下列对“非典”的说明,不正确的一项是(  )

A.“非典”也是一种肺炎,它主要是由流感病毒、支原体、衣原体、腺病毒或其他较不寻常的微生物所引起的。

B.“非典”发作时是既有流感的一般症状,也有典型性肺炎的迹象。

C.流行感冒引起的咳嗽多带痰,而“非典”引起的咳嗽不带痰;典型性肺炎没有传染性,而“非典”有很强的传染性。

D.“非典”病毒是经过飞沫传播的,它的潜伏期一般为2-12天。

3、有关“非典”治疗和预防的说法,不正确的一项是(  )

A.“非典”是可以治疗的,而且治愈率很高。

B.与患者保持三尺以上的空间距离,就完全可以免遭感染。

C.尽量不接触病人,保持空气流通,勤洗手,可以有效地阻止病源的传播。

D.保持心情愉快,提高自身免疫能力,可以有效地预防“非典”病毒的感染。

4、根据文中提供的信息,下列推断不正确的一项是(  )

A.有发烧、咳嗽、头痛、乏力、腹泻、胸闷等症状,可以确诊为“非典”。

B.健康人进入“非典”病人呆过但离开超过6个小时以上的房间,一般不会被感染。

C.“非典”病毒不会浮游在空气之中,所以一般不会通过空气传播。

D.“非典”患者在15天内病情没有恶化,一般不会有生命危险。

单项选择题