问题 单项选择题

甲乙两国长期以来由于民族宗教问题矛盾甚深,交恶甚重,以至于发生了战争。丙国和甲国是曾经共同患难的盟国,同时和乙国又因近年的经济发展产生了积极的友好合作关系,大量丙国居民侨居或移民乙国,丙国于是在甲乙两国之间的战争之间选择了中立。对此,下列说法正确的是哪一项

A.丙国并无义务防止甲国在丙国东北部建立洲际导弹基地
B.丙国若是联合国会员国,则会受《联合国 * * 》所确定的集体安全制度的制约和影响,那么丙国不能随意选择中立
C.对于乙国对丙国从事非中立义务的船舶的拿捕行为,丙国无需容忍
D.丙国若和乙国继续保持正常的外交和经济合作关系,甲国可以对这种关系表示反对

答案

参考答案:B

解析: 本题考点是中立国之权利和义务。在中立国的权利方面,中立国有权与交战国的任何一方保持正常的外交和商务关系。对于不违背其中立义务的情况下,对互为敌国的交战国一方进行的交往,交战国的另一方应予以尊重和容忍。所以D项表述不当,丙国、乙国继续保持正常的外交和经济合作关系并不违背中立义务,甲国应当尊重。在中立国的义务方面,中立国有义务采取一切可能的措施,防止交战国在其领土或其管辖范围内的区域从事战争,或利用其资源准备从事战争敌对行动以及与战争相关的行动,包括在该区域中征兵、备战、建立军事设施或捕获敌国船只、运输军队等;还要防止交战国利用中立国领土或其管辖区域,装备船舰或增加船舰武装,包括将商船改装为军舰;中立国还须容忍交战国根据战争法对其国家和人民采取的有关措施,包括对其有关船舶的临检、对其从事非中立义务的船舶的拿捕、审判、处罚或非常征用。依此,AC两项均错,丙国必须防止甲国在其东北部建立洲际导弹基地,且对于乙国对丙国从事非中立义务的船舶的拿捕行为,丙国必须容忍。在现代国际法中,不符合《联合国 * * 》规定而使用武力的情况已经被禁止,侵略被视为严重的国际罪行。联合国成员国已经事先在法律上承担了义务,区别对待从事战争或非法使用武力的国家与被侵略国家,这在一定程度上动摇了以不偏不倚为基础的中立。依据《联合国 * * 》,联合国成员国在维护国际和平与安全方面,承担了根据安理会决定(包括使用武力决定)采取集体协助行动的义务,且该 * * 的义务与其他协定义务相比具有优先的地位,国家选择中立的权利受到了制约,故丙国若是联合国会员国,则不能随意选择中立,所以B项正确

问答题 简答题
阅读理解

阅读理解。

     Few people find it easy to refuse a bargain (a product sold at lower price). But bargains are not always

what they seem. Some sales and bargains are good deals, but not all are. Here are some pointers to help you

tell the difference between real bargains and bad deals.

     Sometimes a product is on sale for "below producer's cost". Watch out for this kind of "bargain". Why

would anyone want to sell a product for less than it cost to make it? Before buying, you should find out why

it is being sold at a loss to the producer. Is it damaged? Is it out of style? Does it come with any guarantee

(保障)?

     Another pointer is to read price tags on sale items carefully. For example, a price tag in a store may say

"regular price $16". The regular price is the price of the item before the sales started and after the sale ends.

The regular price is only for that store, however. In another store, the price could be lower.

     A price tag may also say "original (原来的) price $ 16". That means at one time the item sold for $16-even

as much as five years earlier! For example, the original price of pocket calculators was high when they were

introduced. Now the price is much lower. Showing the original price would be misleading.

     Finally, be careful how you use cents-off coupons (优惠券). A coupon can save you money only if you

intend to use the item. The price of an item may not be the same at different stores. So use the coupon at the

store with the lowest price. Don't forget to add any sales tax to the item before you figure out the "cents-off'

price".

1. The purpose of the author to write this article is _____. [ ]

A. to show that there are no real bargains

B. to warn readers that some sales are not bargains

C. to sell a certain product

D to warn readers not to spend money on bargains

2. Which of these statements is an opinion? [ ]

A. Few people find it easy to refuse a bargain.

B. A tax adds to the price of an item.

C The regular price is the price before or after a sale.

D. The price of pocket calculators has dropped.

3. The author's opinion of an item that sells below producer's cost is that _____.[ ]

A. it is out of style

B. it is always a good deal

C. it has no guarantee

D. there may be something wrong with the item

4. The author suggests that cents-off coupons should be used _____. [ ]

A only for items with no tax

B. For as many items as possible

C. in stores with the lowest prices

D. only at the largest store

5. The original price would be misleading because _____. [ ]

A. there might be a sharp drop in price of the item

B. there might be a sharp drop in quality of the item

C. there might be a sharp change in the style of the item

D. there might be no use of the item now