问题 问答题

甲公司为一般纳税人,不开设“预付账款”和“预收账款”科目,存货按实际成本计价核算。2009年12月公司有关资料如下:
(1)1日,“应收账款”科目借方余额为245.25万元,“坏账准备”科目贷方余额为3.63万元,“应付账款”科目贷方余额为10.23万元。:应收账款”和“应付账款”科目所属各明细科目余额如下:
应收账款——A公司(借方)186.03万元;应收账款——B公司(借方)5.4万元;
应收账款——C公司(借方)53.82万元;应付账款——H公司(贷方)2.34万元;
应付账款——K公司(贷方)19.89万元;应付账款——L公司(借方)12万元。
(2)当月公司发生部分业务如下:
①5日,收到D公司归还的购货欠款;该笔应收账款为11.7万元,以前年度已作为坏账予以核销。
②9日,收到A公司归还的全部购货欠款186.03万元并存入银行。
③12日,收到C公司寄来的3月期、面值53.82万元的商业汇票,用于抵付所欠货款。
④16日,采用托收承付结算方式向E公司赊销商品,不含税价款40万元,增值税税额 6.8万元,以银行存款代垫运杂费0.4万元,已办妥托收手续,符合收入确认条件。
⑤19日,向F公司预付购料款8万元。
⑥23日,确认B公司所欠劳务款5.4万元已无法收回,作坏账损失处理。
⑦26日,预收C公司购货款15万元存入银行。
⑧28日,收到L公司发来的原材料并全部验收入库,取得的增值税发票注明:不含税价款24万元,增值税税额4.08万元。
⑨31日,计提当年全部债券投资的利息。该债券为K公司2009年6月30日按面值发行的、5年期、年利率8%,到期一次还本付息的企业债券,甲公司取得该项面值为900万元的债券并将其划分为持有至到期投资。
⑩31日,通过对E公司应收账款进行减值测试确定,应冲减坏账准备7.23万元。且公司测试认定:除应收账款外,其他应收款项不存在减值迹象。
[要求](1)根据资料(2)编制甲公司2009年12月上述业务会计分录并列示计算过程。
(2)计算甲公司2009年12月31日资产负债表中“应收账款”和“应付账款”项目应填列金额。

答案

参考答案:1.
(1)编制甲公司2009年12月有关业务会计分录:
①借:银行存款 117000
贷:坏账准备 117000
②借:银行存款 1860300
贷:应收账款——A公司 1860300
③借:应收票据 538200
贷:应收账款——C公司 538200
④借:应收账款——E公司 472000
贷:主营业务收入 400000
应交税费——应交增值税(销项税额) 68000
银行存款 4000
⑤借:应付账款——F公司 80000
贷:银行存款 80000
⑥借:坏账准备 54000
贷:应收账款——B公司 54000
⑦借:银行存款 150000
贷:应收账款——G公司 150000
⑧借:原材料 240000
应交税费——应交增值税(进项税额) 40800
贷:应付账款——L公司 280800
⑨应计提的债券利息=9000000×8%÷2=360000(元)
借:持有至到期投资——应计利息 360000
贷:投资收益 360000
⑩借:坏账准备 72300
贷:资产减值损失 72300
(2)“坏账准备”科目年末贷方余额=36300+117000-54000-72300=27000(元)
资产负债表中“应收账款”项目应填列金额=472000-27000=445000(元)
资产负债表中“应付账款”项目应填列金额=198900+23400+280800-120000=3831700 (元)

单项选择题
单项选择题

It is no longer just dirty blue-collar jobs in manufacturing that are being sucked offshore but also white-collar service jobs, which used to be considered safe from foreign competition. Telecoms charges have tumbled, allowing workers in far-flung locations to be connected cheaply to customers in the developed world. This has made it possible to offshore services that were once non-tradable. Morgan Stanley’s Mr. Roach has been drawing attention to the fact that the "global labour arbitrage" is moving rapidly to the better kinds of jobs. It is no longer just basic data processing and call centres that are being outsourced to low-wage countries, but also software programming, medical diagnostics, engineering design, law, accounting, finance and business consulting. These can now be delivered electronically from anywhere in the world, exposing skilled white-collar workers to greater competition.

The standard retort to such arguments is that outsourcing abroad is too small to matter much. So far fewer than lm American service-sector jobs have been lost to off-shoring. Forrester Research forecasts that by 2015 a total of 3.4m jobs in services will have moved abroad, but that is tiny compared with the 30m jobs destroyed and created in America every year. The trouble is that such studies allow only for the sorts of jobs that are already being off-shored, when in reality the proportion of jobs that can be moved will rise as IT advances and education improves in emerging economies.

Alan Blinder, an economist at Princeton University, believes that most economists are underestimating the disruptive effects of off-shoring, and that in future two to three times as many service jobs will be susceptible to off-shoring as in manufacturing. This would imply that at least 30% of all jobs might be at risk. In practice the number of jobs off-shored to China or India is likely to remain fairly modest. Even so, the mere threat that they could be shifted will depress wages:

Moreover, says Mr. Blinder, education offers no protection. Highly skilled accountants, radiologists or computer programmers now have to compete with electronically delivered competition from abroad, whereas humble taxi drivers, janitors and crane operators remain safe from off-shoring. This may help to explain why the real median wage of American graduates hat fallen by 6% since 2000, a bigger decline than in average wages.

In the 1980s and early 1990s, the pay gap between low-paid, low-skilled workers and high-paid, high-skilled workers widened significantly. But since then, according to a study by David Autor, Lawrence Katz and Melissa Kearney, in America, Britain and Germany workers at the bottom as well as at the top have done better than those in the middle-income ’group. Office cleaning cannot be done by workers in India. It is the easily standardised skilled job in the middle, such as accounting, that are now being squeezed hardest. A study by Bradford Jensen and Lori Kletzer, at the Institute for International Economics in Washington D. C., confirms that workers in tradable services that are exposed to foreign competition tend to be more skilled than workers in non-tradable services and tradable manufacturing industries.

Which of the following statements is the typical reply concerning off-shoring()

A. Service-sector has sustained a great loss

B. White-collar workers will not have a narrow escape

C. Most economists underestimated the effects of off-shoring

D. Outsourcing abroad has no significant impact