A conventional teacher’s licensee usually requires a university degree in education plus an unpaid term of practice teaching. This has never made much sense. It excludes bright students who take degrees in other subjects, and might teach those subjects; it is costly and time-consuming for career-switchers, who must wait a year or more before they can enter a classroom; it is so rigid that private-school teachers or university professors with years of experience have to jump through hoops before they can start teaching in a state school. And there is virtually no evidence that it creates better teachers. For all that, it is ply backed by schools of education, which have a monopoly of teacher-training, and by teachers’ unions, whose members make more money when it is artificially hard for others to get into the profession.
Now, some 45 states and the Districts of Columbia offer an "alternative route" to a teacher’s licensee, up from only a handful in the 1980s. Alternative certification (AC) generally allows individuals with a university degree to begin teaching immediately after passing an entrance examination. These recruits, watched over by a mentor teach the subject they studied at university, and take education courses at a sponsoring university while drawing their salaries.
The traditional sort of American teacher is likely to be young, white and female. Alternative certification attracts more men and more non-whites. In Texas, for instance, roughly 90% of public-school teachers are white, but 40% of those who have joined through alternative certification are non-whites. The AC route also draws teachers willing to go where they are most needed. A survey of Troops to Teachers, a program that turns exsoldiers into public-school teachers (" Proud to serve again"), found that 39% of those taking part are willing to teach in inner-city schools, and 68% in rural areas.
Are they good teachers Officialdom is reluctant to release the details which might answer that question for certain. But anecdotal evidence suggests they do well. In New Jersey, which has been running this sort of program since 1984, rich districts, which can afford to be choosy, consistently hire more AC teachers than poor districts do. In Houston, Texas, where the Teach of America program (TFA) puts recent university graduates into poor communities as teachers, the most effective teachers are generally the TFA ones. " School principals are our biggest fans," Wendy Kopp, TFA’s president, says proudly.
So why not scrap the cumbersome teacher-licensing laws Frederick Hess, a professor at the University of Virginia, has written a paper for the Progressive Policy Institute arguing that teacher-licensing ought to be stripped to the bare essentials. Prospective teachers should be required only to hold a college degree, pass a test of essential skills, and be checked to make sure they do not have a criminal background. Other training is important, argues Mr. Hess, but the market, not state legislators, should decide what that training looks like. This notion of "competitive certification" has drawn favorable attention from the Bush administration.
What has changed since the introduction of AC()
A. Schools now have more male than female teachers
B. Non-whites account for 40% of Texas’s school teachers
C. AC has turned a number of soldiers into teachers
D. The percentage of teachers willing to work in inner city has risen
参考答案:C
解析:
[考核题型] 事实细节题
文章第三段集中讲述了AC实施后的一系列变化。主要是两点:第一,它吸引了更多的男性和非白人教师;第二,也培训出那些愿意到亟需师资的地区(包括内陆城市和乡村地区)教学的老师。用排除法解题。A项说现在学校的男教师比女教师多,男教师数量的增加只是相对于过去而言。B项说得克萨斯州的非白人教师占学校教师的40%,而原文说的是那些参加AC培训的人中有40%是黑人,得克萨斯州公立学校中白人教师的比例为90%,显然也不对。D项说愿意到内陆城市工作的教师比例增加了,原文只列出了由士兵转为教师的那些人愿意到乡村或内陆城市教学比例,没有涉及比例是否增加,因此也不对。剩下只能选择C项。选择的依据是文章最后一句话。