问题 单项选择题

(三)阅读下文,回答下 * * 题。

司马迁以孔子之后的文化领袖自许,决心写出胜过《春秋》的《史记》,他并未狂言欺世。论《史记》的成就,不管从中国历史长期已行的实践性,或从集文化之大成的广博性和从领风气之先的进步性哪一个方面而言,较其前人,都是后来居上之佼佼者。如以实践而论,中国封建社会几千年行之有效的外儒内法的政体,并非是孔子思想的体现,实则以司马迁崇儒而不弃法的思想所构建;上层文化领域内百家竞流的实际,也非孔子一家的独行,而是司马迁“整齐百家”的再现。论其文化知识面的广博,李长之先生誉司马迁为“百科全书”式的人物,其巨著《史记》当然也就是“百科全书”类的宝藏了。《史记》除了囊括孔子所致力于诗、书、礼、乐之外,又融会百家学说于一炉,包括政治、经济、军事、教育、民族、民俗,特别还有天文、地理、医学、科技等;而且并非停留于孔子“述而不作”的整理介绍阶段,力求做到“通古今之变”的论述,让人们“原始察终”充分认识其历史源流的发展变化。论其文化思想的进步性,且不必详列对各科文化的卓识远见,仅就政治上不提倡“克己复礼”,而在总结“承敝通变”的基础上大力颂扬革新进步;经济上不重本抑末,而提倡创造财富发展商品经济;在国家的统一上,不囿于“华夏之分”的狭隘圈子,而提倡华夏各民族都是黄帝子孙的诸民族大一统的崇高思想;对外不是闭关自守,自我独尊,而是竭力介绍域外物产,让人放眼更广阔的天地。诸如这些思想认识,不仅在两千多年以前是十分杰出、领先的,即如在两千年以后的今天,亦是闪闪发光,仍具有相当生命力的。所以,我们完全可以说,司马迁是位当之无愧的华夏文化巨人,其文化思想精髓,也是中 * * 文化精神的真正代表。

(董继昌《司马迁与华夏文化丛书·序》)

根据文义,说说“原始察终”中的“原”是什么意思?()

A.本来面貌

B.事物的根源

C.追究、探究根源

D.细微精察之处

答案

参考答案:C

解析:

“原”与“察”一样在句子中是动词,应为“追究、探究”之意。

单项选择题
问答题

In the current immigration wave, something markedly different is happening here in the middle of the great American "melting pot." (46) There is a sense that, especially as immigrant populations reach a critical mass in many communities, it is no longer the melting pot that is transforming them, but they who are transforming American society.

American culture remains a powerful force—for better or worse—that influences people both here and around the world in countless ways. But several factors have combined in recent years to allow immigrants to resist, if they choose, the Americanization that had once been considered irresistible.

In fact, the very concept of assimilation is being called into question as never before. (47) Some sociologists argue that the melting pot often means little more than "Anglo conformity" and that assimilation is not always a positive experience—for either society or the immigrants themselves. And with today’s emphasis on diversity and ethnicity, it has become easier than ever for immigrants to avoid the melting pot entirely. Even the metaphor itself is changing, having fallen out of fashion completely with many immigration advocacy and ethnic groups. They prefer such terms as the "salad bowl" and the "mosaic," metaphors that convey more of a sense of separateness in describing this nation of immigrants.

(48) Among socially conservative families such as the Jacintos, who initially moved to California from their village in Mexico’s Guanajuato state, then migrated here in 1988 to find jobs in the meatpacking industry, bad influences are a constant concern. They see their children assimilating, but often to the worst aspects of American culture.

Their concerns reflect some of the complexities and ambivalence that mark the assimilation process these days. Immigrants such as the Jacintos are here to stay but remain wary of their adoptive country. According to sociologists, they are right to be concerned.

"If assimilation is a learning process, it involves learning good things and bad things," said Ruben G. Rumbaut, a sociology professor at Michigan State University. "It doesn’t always lead to something better."

The ambivalence of assimilation can cut both ways. Many native-born Americans also seem to harbor mixed feelings about the process. (49) As a nation, the United States increasingly promotes diversity, but there are underlying concerns that the more emphasis there is on the factors that set people apart, the more likely that society will end up divided.

With Hispanics, especially Mexicans, accounting for an increasing proportion of U.S. population growth, it is this group, more than any other, that is redefining the melting pot.

Hispanics now have overtaken blacks as the largest minority group in Nebraska and will become the biggest minority in the country within the next seven years, according to Census Bureau projections. (50) The nation’s 29 million Hispanics, the great majority of them from Mexico, have thus become the main focus for questions about how the United States today is assimilating immigrants, or how it is being transformed.

(46) There is a sense that, especially as immigrant populations reach a critical mass in many communities, it is no longer the melting pot that is transforming them, but they who are transforming American society.