问题 多项选择题

孙某(男)与郭某(女)干2001年在中国青岛市市南区结婚,2002年3月起,孙某长期在加拿大出差,并最终移居加拿大,成为加拿大籍公民。2004年8月,郭某以夫妻双方感情早巳破裂为由向中国青岛市市南区人民法院提起诉讼,要求与孙某解除婚姻关系。孙某于2004年9月15日在加拿大收到了郭某的起诉状副本,并于2004年10月7日向青岛市市南区人民法院提出了管辖权异议,青岛市市南区人民法院驳回了孙某的管辖权异议申请,并于2004年10月10日向孙某送达了裁定书,孙某当日签收了裁定书。 2004年1月3日,孙某就管辖权异议裁定向上级人民法院提起了上诉。对于本案,下列说法错误的有:

A.孙某的答辩符合法律规定,其答辩有效

B.孙某的答辩超过了答辩期限,其答辩无效

C.孙某对驳回管辖权异议的裁定无权上诉,其上诉无效

D.孙某的上诉超过了法定期限,其上诉无效

答案

参考答案:B,C,D

解析:[考点] 涉外民事诉讼的期间
依据《民事诉讼法》第248条的规定,孙某已移居加拿大,并成为了加拿大籍公民,属于在中华人民共和国内没有住所的人,人民法院送达起诉状副本给孙某,孙某应在收到起诉状副本后30日内提出答辩状、在奉案中,孙某是在2004年9月15日收到了郭某的起诉状副本,并于2004年10月7日向青岛市市南区人民法院提出了管辖权异议,并未超过30日的答辩期,因此,孙某的答辩为有效答辩,A项正确,B项错误。依据《民事诉讼法》第140条的规定,孙某可以对管辖权异议的裁定提起上诉,因此,C项错误、同时依据《民事诉讼法》第249条的规定,孙某若不服管辖权异议的裁定,有权在裁定书送达之日起30日内提起上诉。在本案中,青岛市市南区人民法院是于2004年10月10日向孙某送达裁定书,孙某当日签收了裁定书,2004年11月3日,孙某就管辖权异议裁定向上级人民法院提起了上诉,并未超过30日的上诉期限,因此,D项错误。

单项选择题
阅读理解

第II卷

注意事项:

1. 用黑色墨水的钢笔或签字笔将答案写在答题纸上。2. 本卷共6小题,共35分。

第三部分:写作

第一节   阅读表达(共5小题;每小题2分,满分10分)

阅读下面短文,并根据题目要求用英语回答问题(请注意问题后的字数要求)。

Several years ago, while attending a communication course, I experienced a most unusual process. The instructor asked us to list anything in our past that we felt ashamed of, regretted or incomplete about and read our lists aloud.

This seemed like a very private process, but there’s always some brave soul in the crowd who will volunteer. The instructor then suggested that we find ways to make an apology to people, or take some action to right any wrong doings. I was seriously wondering how this could ever improve my communication.

Then the man next to me raised his hand and volunteered this story: “Making my list, I remembered an incident from high school. I grew up in a small town. There was a Sheriff that none of us kids liked. One night, my two buddies and I decided to play a trick on him.

After drinking a few beers, we climbed the tall water tank in the middle of the town, and wrote on the tank in bright red paint: Sheriff Brown is an s.o.b. (畜生). The next day, almost the whole town saw our glorious sign. Within two hours, Sheriff Brown had us in his office. My friends told the truth but I lied. No one ever found out.”

“Nearly 20 years later, Sheriff Brown’s name appears on my list. I didn’t even know if he was still alive. Last weekend, I dialed the information in my hometown and found there was a Roger Brown still listed. I tried his number. After a few rings, I heard, “Hello?” I said, “Sheriff Brown?” paused. “Yes.” “Well, this is Jimmy Calkins.”

“And I want you to know that I did it?”Paused. “I knew it!” he yelled back. We had a good laugh and a lively discussion. His closing words were: “Jimmy, I always felt bad for you because your buddies got it off their chest, but you were carrying it around all these years. I want to thank you for calling me for your sake.”

Jimmy inspired me to clear up all 101 items on my list within two years, and I always remember what I learned from the course: It’s never too late to right the past wrongdoings.

56. What was the uneasy part of communication course about for the writer?

____________________________________________________________________________

57. Please explain the underlined word “buddies” in English. 

_________________________________________________________________________

58. Please state one of your wrongdoings and how to right it.  

____________________________________________________________________________

59. Why did Sheriff Brown pause twice before he could carry on the telephone conversation?

____________________________________________________________________________

60. What does the writer learn from the course?

_________________________________________________________________________