问题 单项选择题

We have known for a long time that the organization of any particular society is influenced by the definition of the sexes and the distinction drawn between them. But we have realized only recently that the identity of each sex is not so easy to pin down, and that definitions evolve in accordance with different types of culture known to us, that is, scientific discoveries and ideological revolutions. Our nature is not considered as immutable, either socially or biologically. As we approach the beginning of the 21st century, the substantial progress made in biology and genetics is radically challenging the roles, responsibilities and specific characteristics attributed to each sex, and yet, scarcely twenty years ago, these were thought to be "beyond dispute".

We can safely say, with a few minor exceptions, that the definition of the sexes and their respective functions remained unchanged in the West from the beginning of the 19tb century to the 1960s. The role distinction, raised in some cases to the status of uncompromising dualism on a ply hierarchical model, lasted throughout this period, appealing for its justification to nature, religion and customs alleged to have existed since the dawn of time. The woman bore children and took care of the home. The man set out tc conquer the world and was responsible for the survival of his family, by satisfying their needs in peacetime and going to war when necessary.

The entire world order rested on the divergence of the sexes. Any overlapping or confusion between the roles was seen as a threat to the time-honored order of things. It was felt to be against nature, a deviation from the norm.

Sex roles were determined according to the "place" appropriate to each. Women’s place was, first and foremost, in the home. The outside world, i.e. workshops, factories and business firms, belonged to men. This sex-based division of the world (private and public) gave rise to a strict dichotomy between the attitudes, which conferred on each its special identity. The woman, sequestered at home, "cared, nurtured and conserved". To do this, she had no need to be daring, ambitious, tough or competitive. The man, on the other hand, competing with his fellow men, was caught up every day in the struggle for survival, and hence developed those characteristics which were thought natural in a man.

Today, many women go out to work, and their reasons for doing so have changed considerably. Besides, the traditional financial incentives, we find ambition and personal fulfillment motivating those in the most favorable circumstances, and the wish to have a social life and to get out of their domestic isolation influencing others. Above all, for all women, work is invariably connected with the desire for independence.

It is only in recent years that we have recognized that()

A.there is almost no clue to the identity of both sexes

B.the role distinction between different sexes is conspicuous

C.the different definitions of sexes bears on the development of culture

D. the progress of civilization greatly influences the role definitions of sexes

答案

参考答案:D

解析:

[注释] 细节理解题。本题问:直到最近我们才意识到什么第1段第2句写道:“但是直到最近我们才意识到,每一种性别的本性是很难说清楚的,并且定义是按照我们所知道的不同文化,即科学发现和思想革命,在发展的。”由此可见,[D]“文明的进步对男女性别作用的定义有很大影响”符合上述句意。[A]there is almost no clue to the identity of both sexes(几乎没有线索来确定两种性别的本性)属概念偷换,故应排除。[B]the role distinction between different sexes is conspicuous(不同性别所承担的工作差别是显而易见的)属正反颠倒,故不能入选。[C]the different definitions of sexes bears on the development of culture(性别的不同定义对文化的发展产生影响)属前后颠倒,故不能入选。

注意:pin down确定;清楚说明。

单项选择题
问答题

案情:2007年5月7日,小贝在北京万信通数码销售公司购买了TF公司制造的手机一部,在随机附带说明书中,有“手机由TF公司1年保修,1个月保换”的说明。小贝因手机出现问题找到万信通公司修理,但万信通公司均以手机是TF公司的产品,自己无修理义务为由加以拒绝,并让小贝自己去找TF公司解决。
2007年9月8日,小贝将自己这一经历写成《TF公司,你拿什么对得起你的顾客》一文,发表在叮叮网站的论坛上,后小贝又就此事向北京市海淀区“消协”投诉TF公司。同时,TF公司亦在互联网上发现此文,马上与小贝取得联系,同意免费为小贝修理手机,但希望小贝能够在互联网上对自己的行为公开道歉。小贝表示不同意并提出不修手机了。9月16日小贝又写了《抵抗到底》一文在互联网上发表,该文中写道,“TF公司号称他们引以为荣的就是他们的手机质量过硬,但恰恰就是这样的手机,外表华丽,内部朽烂,我买手机,又不是买破烂”。随后其在互联网上开设个人主页,题目为“声讨TF公司,维护消费者权益”,该主页设有文献收录、签名声讨TF公司等栏目。《顾客》一文及其他几篇相关文章也被收录在内。签名声讨TF公司的栏目中有指向论坛的链接。
10月2日,××日报发表了该报记者有关此事的文章,其中写道:“据网上反应大多数消费者认为TF公司在产品出现问题的前提下对消费者采取不负责任的态度,构成了对消费者的侵权”,并称“专为此开设的主页中也满是全国各地消费者对小贝的声援和对TF公司的声讨”。小贝的文章及与TF公司交往的来函在其个人主页上的接连发表及有关报刊的报道,吸引众多网民在论坛上留言,其中含有大量的对TF公司带有侮辱性的内容。在这种情况下,TF公司的经销商纷纷收回订单,给TF公司造成了极大的损失。
后TF公司起诉小贝侵犯其名誉权,要求小贝与××日报公开赔礼道歉,并赔偿经济损失50万元,后经一审二审,最终判定小贝向TF公司公开赔礼道歉,并赔偿经济损失9万元,××日报则登报向TF公司道歉。
答题要求:
1.第一问的分析应以法学理论、现行法律规定为依据;
2.第二问的论述应观点明确,论证充分,逻辑严谨,文字通顺,字数不少于500字。

问题:
1.请就本案中出现的行为所涉及的法律问题进行简要分析;