问题 解答题

已知等差数列{an}的前n项和为Sn,a2=4,S5=35.

(Ⅰ)求数列{an}的前n项和Sn

(Ⅱ)若数列{bn}满足bn=p an(p≠0),求数列{bn}的前n项的和Tn

答案

(Ⅰ)设数列{an}的首项为a1,公差为d.

a1+d=4
5a1+
5(5-1)
2
d=35

解得

a1=1
d=3

∴an=3n-2.

∴前n项和Sn=

n(1+3n-2)
2
=
n(3n-1)
2

(Ⅱ)∵an=3n-2,∴bn=p3n-2,且b1=p(p≠0).

当n≥2时,

bn
bn-1
=
p3n-2
p3(n-1)-2
=p3为定值,

∴数列bn构成首项为p,公比为p3的等比数列.     

所以   (1)当p3=1,即p=1时,Tn=n,

(2)当p3≠1,即p≠1时数列{bn}的前n项的和是

Tn=

p(1-p3n)
1-p3
=
p3n+1-p
p3-1

单项选择题

It is clear that some chemicals can damage the health of animals and humans. (1) , this is not the only problem that (2) be caused by the careless use of chemicals. Chemicals can also (3) the ecological balance of the environment. If the ecological balance is disturbed, the results can be (4) serious.The (5) of DDT illustrates the problem. DDT, a chemical which kills insects, at first seemed to be a perfect answer (6) many problems. It would control insects that caused dangerous diseases, (7) insects that caused billions of dollars of damage to crops every year. Governments permitted and even (8) the use of DDT. Farmers in many countries (9) to spray it on their crops. The (10) results were good. Damage to crops (11) down, and profits went up. However, the chemical had effects which the scientists didn’t see in (12) . First, it also killed insects which were the (13) enemies of the harmful insects and which were therefore beneficial to farmers. Second, and perhaps worse, DDT did not kill (14) harmful insect. A few insects had natural resistance to the chemical. They (15) and reproduced in large numbers. In a few years there were large numbers of insects which were not (16) by DDT, and there were (17) insects which Could act as natural (18) on these new "super-insects". Finally, it became clear that DDT was not solving the insect problem. In fact, it was making the problem worse. It (19) became necessary to find a second (20) for the effects of the first.

第(12)空应选择()

A.need

B.turn

C.advance

D.vain

单项选择题