问题 填空题

All modern human originated in sub-Saharan Africa, according to a new study boasted by its founders as the "final blow" against an opposing viewpoint. Not so fast, says one anthropologist who finds flaws in the evidence.

The new study, published in the July 19 issue of the journal Nature, delivers what the researchers say could be the final verdict in support of the single point "Out of Africa" theory.

Manica and colleagues took multiple measurements of more than 4,500 male fossil skulls from 105 populations around the globe. They combined the results with data from studies of global genetic variations in humans, finding that both genetic and skull variability decreased with distance from Africa. So populations in southeastern Africa held the highest variability compared with populations in other countries.

The results held even when the scientists accounted for climate, since climate conditions can lead to changes in skull features. " In very cold climates you tend to generate a slightly thicker brow ridge. Whether or not that’ s to keep horrible blizzards out of your eyes, I don’ t know, " Amos said.

Past studies based on skull morphology have been weak and have supported both of the humanorigin views.

In his own research, Hawks is funding that natural selection has led to changes in thousands of genes during only the past few thousand years.

"I’ m really thinking just the opposite of this paper, " Hawks said. "There are differences in the skull between populations, including their variability, but it is mostly due to very recent effects and not the origin of modern humans. "

"The muhiregional idea is identical to the recent African origin idea, except for its prediction that Europeans and Asians were part of the single population of origin and didn’t become extinct. "

[A] "Humans seem to have poured out of Africa, spread out across the world, but at a really quite uniform rate such that you get this lovely gradual loss of diversity," said study team member William Amos of the University of Cambridge.

[B] All modern humans originated from the same ancestors and they kept evolving as the society advances. Some species died out but others remained to live on the earth, which is still impossible to solve.

[C] At the end of the day, a resolution to the " Out of Africa" debate may be impossible, he said. Most of the evidence can be interpreted as supporting both human-origins theories. "It’ s really hard to find the two," Hawks said.

[D] This study " adds a p line of evidence to the Out of Africa (hypothesis) using such morphology," said paleontologist Will Harcourt-Smith of the American Museum of Natural History in New York. Harcourt-Smith was not involved in the current research.

[E] Debate over the origins of modern humans has simmered among anthropologists for years, with one theory asserting that Homo sapiens migrated across the world from a single point in Africa. The other theory states that multiple populations of Homo sapiens independently evolved from Homo erectus in regions beyond Africa.

[F] The recent study was funded by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council. It has provided conclusive evidence concerning the actual process of human evolution.

[G] "We have combined our genetic data with new measurements of a large sample of skulls to show definitely that modern humans originated from a single area in sub-Saharan Africa," said lead researcher Andrea Manica of the University of Cambridge.

41. ______42. ______43. ______44. ______ 45.______

44()

答案

参考答案:D

解析:

上两段提到:这些结果很具有说服力,而且过去基于颅骨形态的研究欠缺说服力,而且对于人类起源的两种观点都能够支持。这说明过去“颅骨形态”研究的不足,选项D提到了此项研究为此提供了一条强有力的证据,就是在指出这项研究的重要意义。

单项选择题
问答题 案例分析题

【背景材料】某综合性医院建设工程项目,业主与承包方及监理单位分别签订了工程施工合同及委托监理合同。工程开工后曾发生下列事件。事件一:在工程的基础施工中,由于施工班组的违章作业,使经过监理人员检验合格的基础钢筋出现位移质量事故,在混凝土浇筑不久后被监理方发现,及时口头指示后并书面通知承包方立即停工处理和整改。承包方按监理方指令执行,提出质量事故报告及处理方案,经监理工程师审查批准后实施。整改完成后,经监理方重新检验确认合格后,指令复工,继续基础混凝土施工,并明确由此造成的经济损失由承包方承担,工期不予延长。监理方还将此事故及处理情况向业主作了报告。而业主代表书面提出:出现质量事故,监理公司也应负一定责任,要求扣除1%的监理费作为罚金。事件二:在地下管道施工中,管道铺设完毕后,承包方曾书面通知监理方要求检查管道铺设质量。但监理方收到质量验收通知单后,在合同约定的时间内并未前去检验,也未提出延期检查的书面要求。因此,承包方即将管沟予以回填。为此,监理方书面指令承包方将管沟重新挖开,以便检验管道质量。承包方按监理方要求对管沟进行剥露,经监理方检查后,确认管道铺设质量未达到设计图纸要求和合同要求,也不符合标准和规范要求,管道结合部严重漏水。因此,监理方要求承包方返工。承包方按要求进行了管道的返工处理,经监理方检验质量合格予以确认后,将管沟重新回填。由此,造成工期拖延了7天,经济损失8万元。承包方提出了索赔要求。

承包方在管道未经监理检查并认可其质量的情况下,能否回填和覆盖?管沟合法回填的前提条件是什么?