问题 单项选择题

甲公司与乙公司签订买卖合同。合同约定甲公司先交货。交货前,甲公司派人调查乙公司的偿债能力,有确切材料证明乙公司负债累累,根本不能按时支付货款。甲公司遂暂时不向乙公司交货。甲公司的行为是:()

A.违约行为

B.行使同时履行抗辩权

C.行使先诉抗辩权

D.行使不安抗辩权

答案

参考答案:D

解析:

本题涉及不安抗辩权与其他抗辩权的认定问题。甲公司负有先行交货义务,但其有证据证明乙公司已丧失履行债务的能力,故其可行使不安抗辩权。本题正确选项为D。

不定项选择
单项选择题

Throughout the 19th century and into the 20th, citizens of the United States maintained a bias against big cities. Most lived on farms and in small towns and believed cities to be centres of (1) , crime, poverty and moral (2) Their distrust was caused, (3) , by a national ideology that (4) farming the greatest occupation and rural living (5) to urban living. This attitude (6) even as the number of urban dwellers increased and cities became an essential (7) of the national landscape. Gradually, economic reality overcame ideology. Thousands (8) the precarious (不稳定的) life on the farm for more secure and better paying jobs in the city. But when these people (9) from the countryside, they carried their fears and suspicions with them. These new urbanities, already convinced that cities were (10) with great problems, eagerly (11) the progressive reforms that promised to bring order out of the (12) of the city.

One of many reforms came (13) the area of public utilities. Water and sewerage systems were usually operated by (14) governments, but the gas and electric networks were privately owned. Reformers feared that the privately owned utility companies would (15) exorbitant (过渡的) rates for these essential services and (16) them only to people who could afford them. Some city and state governments responded by (17) the utility companies, but a number of cities began to supply these services themselves. (18) of these reforms argued that public ownership and regulation would (19) widespread access to these utilities and guarantee a (20) price.

(4)()

A.proclaimed 

B.exclaimed 

C.claimed 

D.reclaim