问题 填空题

[A] Possible ways to keep free from Alzheimer’s
[B] Deficiency of data-collecting in the study
[C] The new findings of ineffectiveness of past cures
[D] Weak evidence of the research
[E] How the new analysis coming from
[F] Future direction of the research concerned
[G] Traditional beliefs in preventive measures

Lifestyle May Not Prevent Alzheimer’s


A comprehensive analysis by an independent government panel has found that there is not enough scientific evidence to date to support the advice doctors currently give—such as exercising, doing crossword puzzles or eating a Mediterranean-style diet—for preventing or controlling symptoms of Alzheimer’s disease and dementia.
(41)______
As rates of age-related dementia and Alzheimer’s disease have continued to rise in the U.S.—largely because Americans are living longer and the over-65 population has swelled to record highs—researchers have worked relentlessly to understand the causes of these mind- robbing diseases and to help prevent or slow their progression. To clarify the state of the current evidence and offer physicians clearer treatment guidelines, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in early 2009 commissioned a detailed analysis of existing studies, covering 165 papers published between 1984 and 2009.
(42)______
For years, the prevailing hypothesis has been "Use it or lose it" when it comes to avoiding gradual age-related mental decline. Data has associated behaviors such as keeping the mind actively engaged throughout life, staying physically active, eating certain foods and supplementing the diet with specific vitamins and nutrients with lower rates of dementia in old age. These lifestyle factors appeared to limit cognitive decline of various kinds, from occasional "senior moments" to the more serious episodes of cognitive impairment that can be a prelude to Alzheimer’s disease.
(43)______
Now researchers at Duke University report in the current issue of the Annals of Internal Medicine that the data on the preventive effects of lifestyle factors is not as p as they had thought. Led by Brenda Plassman, a professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences, the study authors analyzed decades’ worth of research, including observational studies in which scientists looked retrospectively at a group of participants to tease out associations between certain behaviors (like exercise) and selected effects (like scores on tests of memory and cognitive skills), as well as the more definitive clinical trials that randomly assign volunteers to intervention or control groups and then assess how the intervention affects cognitive ability.
(44)______
Overall, the researchers say they were dismayed with the paucity and weakness of the existing evidence. "When we applied rigorous but consistent standards to review all the studies, we found that there was not sufficient evidence to recommend any single activity or factor that was protective of cognitive decline later in life, " says Plassman.
(45)______
However weakly, though, the review did support what doctors know about risk factors for cognitive decline: smoking, diabetes, depression, metabolic syndrome and specific gene variants were all linked with increased risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease. In addition, preventive behaviors such as eating a Mediterranean diet, exercising, maintaining cognitive engagement (doing puzzles, learning new things) and fostering extensive social relationships were linked to a lower risk.
The problem is that none of these relationships were particularly robust, the authors say. And none were p enough to justify recommending the behaviors to people who want to prevent or slow down the onset of dementia. The findings led the NIH to issue Monday’s state-of-the-science statement, in which the agency notes, "Currently, firm conclusions cannot be drawn about the association of any modifiable risk factor with cognitive decline or Alzheimer’s disease." Although the statement does not constitute an official policy or government recommendation, it serves as a guideline for doctors advising patients about the best evidence on the role of lifestyle factors in Alzheimer’s prevention.

答案

参考答案:A

解析:末段指出,虽然证据不充分,但是该研究确实证实了导致认知能力下降的一些危险因素,如吸烟、糖尿病等(...risk factors for cognitive decline...),第二句还指出了降低患病风险的预防措施,如地中海式饮食、运动等。选项[A]“可能远离阿尔茨海默病的方法”可以概括本段内容,故正确。

选择题
单项选择题

阅读以下文字,完成以下问题。
说谎者控制不了脑波变化,谎话逃不出脑波监测。传统的测谎仪和FMRI图像测试结果有明显不同,也表明了如此复杂的说谎过程用传统测谎仪进行单一的生理指标判定并不科学。利用磁共振技术在今天可以辨别谁在撒谎,谁是说真话。
不过,功能性磁共振成像测谎也并非全能,有着致命的弱点。沈政告诉记者,这一技术只记录说谎后大脑变化的最终结果,然而神经活动却在瞬间完成,说谎也不例外。功能性核磁共振监测的血氧含量是在大脑完成说谎以后的3-6秒发生明显变化,那时,神经活动已经结束。因此,监测到的是心理括动的一个最终结果,而不是活动过程。
不过,与之相比,还有另外一个办法,“说谎时,脑波会发生变化,脑波的变化是说谎者控制不了的。”沈政说。
这个办法被叫做脑事件相关电位。据沈政介绍,这种办法记录的是脑波的变化,而且时间[ ]率非常精细,到了毫秒数量级的脑信号变化,每一毫秒的大脑变化都能够被记录下来。不过,这种方法的空间定位却较功能性磁共振成像测谎差,它不能够准确地记录哪些脑区结构在撒谎过程中发生了变化。
“兼具这两种技术的测谎,将是比较理想的。”沈政告诉记者,目前国际上已经有先进的国家将这两项技术结合起来,只是还没有同时用于测谎。这两项技术的结合运用,将是脑认知科学上最热的课题。
在美国费城Temple大学医学院功能性大脑影像中心主任斯考脱发罗所进行的实验中,就有人成功地通过了传统的测谎仪,而没被测试出来。有专家认为,在今天测谎仪面临巨大争议时,FMRI有望成为一种新型的测谎仪而介入司法活动中。
不过,北京大学心理系教授、博士生导师沈政认为,要使功能性磁共振成像测谎得到普遍、广泛地应用,还需要相当长的时间。
一方面,功能性磁共振成像测谎的设备非常昂贵,一套设备价值200多万美元;另一方面,对实验室的条件和操作人员的要求都非常高。这样的成本,无疑是推广、普及该项技术的一大障碍。
相对而言,脑事件相关电位的测谎较为容易一些。这项技术实施条件并不是很苛刻,成本较低,同时还能监测到大脑内部活动,克服传统测谎仪的弊端。专家预测,这项技术很快即可得到广泛应用。
测谎,是对谎言的鉴别活动。
自1895年意大利犯罪学家朗布罗梭首先使用“测谎仪”从事犯罪侦查以来,测谎技术的发展迄今已有100余年历史。我国自1991年研制出第一台“测谎仪”以来也有10年的历史了。
应用测谎技术,使世界各国的犯罪调查技术向前迈进了一大步,由以往只对物的鉴识,进而为对人的鉴识,成为世界侦查史上一大突破。
不过传统的测谎技术仅是对生理指标进行分析比较,因此遭到不少专家的质疑。人们正期待着一种新的、更为科学的测谎仪器面世。

下列解说,符合原文意思的一项是( )。

A.与功能性磁共振成像测谎相比,脑事件相关电位的测谎推广起来较为容易一些

B.自从我国1991年研制出第一台“测谎仪”以来,测谎技术的发展迄今已有10多年的历史了

C.功能性磁共振成像测谎的设备非常昂贵,一套设备价值200万美元

D.脑事件相关电位比功能性磁共振成像测谎更加先进,它能够准确地记录哪些脑区结构在撒谎过程中发生了变化