To be a good friend, you have to give of yourself, nonetheless not so much that you lose yourself. This is a pretty predictable recipe for happiness. Giving to others—a reliable way of fostering friendships—makes us happier than taking things for ourselves. In the light of research led by Dr. Elizabeth Dunn at the University of British Columbia, money can purchase happiness...on the prerequisite that you utilize it on other people.
Researchers administered three studies consecutively. First, they surveyed more than 600 Americans and found that spending money on gifts and charities led to greater happiness than spending money on oneself.
Subsequently they probed into workers who had just received bonuses and observed that their happiness did not hinge on the size of their bonus but on the decision they made about what to do with whatever amount of money they received. Those who spent more of their bonus on others were happier than those who spent the money on themselves.
Finally, the researchers simply distributed money to a good many subjects, instructing some to spend the money on themselves and others to spend the money on others. At the end of the day, the ones who spent money on others were a good deal happier.
As a consequence, having friends and treating them generously is clearly a winning strategy in life. But what about in business
If you watch even a single episode of any reality TV show based on a competition, such as The Apprentice, you’ll hear a single phrase crop up more often than any other: "I’m not here to make friends!" Is that true Are we better off being cutthroat than collaborative
Once you’re on the job, having a best friend at work is a p predictor of ensuing success. People might define "best" loosely (think of this as kindergarten where you can have more than one "best" friend), but according to a Gallup Organization study of more than 5 million workers over 35, 56% of the people who say they have a best friend at work are engaged, productive, and successful while only 8% of the ones who don’t are.
Another remarkable study, spanning decades, revealed that friendships in high school were an effective predictor of increased wages in adulthood—to the tune of 2% per person who considered you a close friend. To put it otherwise, if in high school three people regarded you as one of their closest same-sex friends, your earnings in adulthood work would be 6% higher.
The happy truth is that the competitors who say they’re not here to make friends don’t win eventually. That’s true for reality TV, for business, and for life as well.
According to the Gallup Organization study, （）
A. it’s enough for one to just have a best friend
B. friendship helps even in the workplace
C. people are not critical about friends at work
D. friends are more helpful at work than at school
参考答案：B
解析：
[试题类型] 推理引申题。
[解题思路] 根据题干关键词a Gallop Organization study定位至第七段，该段指出Gallop Organization的一项对500万名职员的调查结果是，有职场挚友的职员中，56%的人忙碌、工作效率高并且相当成功。没有职场挚友的人中，只有8%的人十分成功，即有挚友且获得成功的职员远远多于没有挚友仍很成功的职员，由此可见，友谊在工作中至关重要，故选项[B]正确。
[干扰排除] Gallop Organization的调查表明，在职场拥有一位挚友的人在工作中表现很好，很成功，但不能据此推出拥有一位挚友就足够了，选项[A]是过度推测，故排除。同样文中也没有提到，人们对于职场中交什么样的朋友是不是挑剔，故排除选项[C]。文中没有将人们在职场中的朋友与学校的朋友进行比较，故排除选项[D]。