问题 单项选择题

The percentage of immigrants (including those unlawfully present) in the United States has been creeping upward for years. At 12.6 percent, it is now higher than at any point since the mid 1920s. We are not about to go back to the days when Congress openly worried about inferior races polluting America’s bloodstream. But once again we are wondering whether we have too many of the wrong sort of newcomers. Their loudest cites argue that the new wave of immigrants cannot, and indeed do not want to, fit in as previous generations did.

We now know that these racist views were wrong. In time, Italians, Romanians and members of other so called inferior races became exemplary Americans and contributed greatly, in ways too numerous to detail, to the building of this magnificent nation. There is no reason why these new immigrants should not have the same success.

Although children of Mexican immigrants do better, in terms of educational and professional attainment, than their parents, UCLA sociologist Edward Telles has found that the gains don’t continue. Indeed, the fourth generation is marginally worse off than the third. James Jackson, of the University of Michigan, has found a similar rend among black Caribbean immigrants, Telles fears that Mexican Americans may be fated to follow in the footsteps of American blacks—that large parts of the community may become mired in a seemingly state of poverty and underachievement. Like African Americans, Mexican Americans are increasingly relegated to (降入) segregated, substandard schools, and their dropout rate is the highest for any ethnic group in the country.

We have learned much about the foolish idea of excluding people on the presumption of the ethnic/racial inferiority. But what we have not yet learned is how to make the process of Americanization work for all. I am not talking about requiring people to learn English or to adopt American ways; those things happen pretty much on their own, but as arguments about immigration hear up the campaign trail, we also ought to ask some broader question about assimilation, about how to ensure that people, once outsiders, don’t forever remain marginalized within these shores.

That is a much larger question than what should happen with undocumented workers, or how best to secure the border, and it is one that affects not only newcomers but groups that have been here for generations. It will have more impact on our future than where we decide to set the admissions bar for the latest ware of would be Americans. And it would be nice if we finally got the answer right.

What does the author think of the new immigrants()

A.They will be a dynamic work force in the US.

B.They can do just as well as their predecessors.

C.They will be very disappointed on the new land.

D.They may find it hard to fit into the mainstream.

答案

参考答案:B

解析:

本题的关键词the new immigrants定位在文章三段末句,意思是为什么这些新移民就不能拥有同样的成功。因此在作者看来新移民同样可以和他们的先人一样。故选B。

填空题
问答题

综合性学习。上海节博会涌现的诸多材料,是我们学习语文的素材,请你珍惜这难得的机会,参与以下活动。

(1)李欣同学收集了一些关于上海世博会的对联,请帮他判别:A项是题在中国             省的场馆,B项是题在中国                省的场馆。

A、上联:竹韵悠悠 湘江竹笛尖栖蝶 下联:桃容楚楚 闹市桃花洞隐尘

B、上联:书生志满怀 孔孟之乡立志 下联:齐鲁青难了 文明之树长青

(2)下面三则材料都来自上海世博会,请就其共同点提炼出一条信息。

材料一:世博园区内布设的第四代移动通信技术TD-LTE试验网,是世界上第一张基于此项技术的4G试验网,通过这一世界领先移动通信技术,参观者可以通过无线网络,即时进行大流量的视频传输、网络下载等。

材料二:“电子标签”技术为手持门票的参观者带来惊喜。世博会的数千万张门票应用了射频识别技术,也就是人们俗称的“电子标签”技术,人均通过世博园区入口闸机时间不超过20秒。

材料三:在上海世博会期间,各展览国带来了大量的最新科技成果。以色列馆展出一种黄豆般大小的胶囊,人吃下去就可以通过“人体漫游”方式完成一次无痛苦的体检。

你提炼的信息是:                                                                            。

(3)阅读下面材料,回答问题。

台湾商人、统振股份公司董事长陈敦仁,八年前到上海考察投资环境,返台当日,下出租车后发现,装有钱包、机票、证件的公文包遗落在车上。在他心急如焚的时候,出租车司机送回了公文包并谢绝了他的红包。陈敦仁当即决定在上海投资。当时,飞机快要起飞了,陈敦仁来不及询问这位司机的姓名。八年里,他不忘打探这位司机的下落,直至今年终于找到了这位司机--已成为上海世博会出租车司机的姚建忠。5月24日,陈敦仁趁着到上海看世博会的机会,亲自向姚建忠道谢,并向他赠送了一面锦旗。

①请你揣摩陈敦仁先生的内心活动,把他向姚建忠道谢时可能说的话写下来。

                                                                                                                   

②请帮陈敦仁先生拟定锦旗上的题词。(字数:4-10个)