问题 单项选择题

Since we are social beings, the quality of our lives depends in large measure on our interpersonal relationships. One strength of the human condition is our tendency to give and receive support from one another under stressful circumstances. Social support consists of the exchange of resources among people based on their interpersonal ties. Those of us with p support systems appear better able to cope with major life changes and daily hassles. People with p social ties live longer and have better health than those without such ties. Studies over a range of illnesses, from depression to heart disease, reveal that the presence of social support helps people fend off illness, and the absence of such support makes poor health more likely.
Social support cushions stress in a number of ways. First, friends, relatives, and co-workers may let us know that they value us. Our self-respect is strengthened when we feel accepted by others despite our faults and difficulties. Second, other people often provide us with informational support. They help us to define and understand our problems and find solutions to them. Third, we typically find social companionship supportive. Engaging in leisure-time activities with others helps us to meet our social needs while at the same time distracting us from our worries and troubles. Finally, other people may give us instrumental support—financial aid, material resources, and needed services—that reduces stress by helping us resolve and cope with our problems.

Research shows that people’s physical and mental health______.

A. relies on the social welfare systems which support them
B. has much to do with the amount of support they get from others
C. depends on their ability to deal with daily worries and troubles
D. is closely related to their strength for coping with major changes in their lives

答案

参考答案:B

解析: 细节理解题。由第一段最后一句可知,社交帮助人们抵挡疾病,而缺少社交则有可能使身体更差;第二段第一句也指出,社交可以减缓压力,故选B。

多项选择题 案例分析题
单项选择题

阅读下文,完成下列问题。
                           杂 言
                        ——关于著作的
作品遭人毁骂,我们常能置之不理,说人家误解了我们或根本不了解我们,作品有人赞美,我们无不欣然引为知音。但是赞美很可能跟毁骂一样的盲目,而且往往对作家的心理更坏,因为赞美是无形中的贿赂,没有白受的道理,我们要保持这不该受的赞美,要常博得这些人的虽不中肯而颇中听的赞美,便不知不觉中迁就迎合,逐渐损失于思想和创作的主动权。有自尊心的人应当对不虞之誉跟求全之毁同样不屑理会——不过人的虚荣心总胜于他的骄傲。
在斯宾诺沙(Spinoza)的哲学里“心”跟“物”是分得清清楚楚的;他给“物”的定义是:只有面积体积而绝无思想。许多言之有物的伟大读物都证明了这个定义的正确。任何大作家的作品,绝不能每一部都好,总有优劣不齐。这当然是句老生常淡,但好像一切老生常谈无人把它挂在心上。我们为某一部作品写得好因而爱好他的作品,这是人之常情。不过爱上了作者以后,我们每每对它起了偏袒,推爱于他的全部作品,一股脑儿都认为是《圣经》宝典。催眠得自己丧失了辨别力,甚至不许旁人有选择权。对莎士比亚的bardolatry就是个例。这可以算“专家”的职业病,仿佛画师的肚子痛和女佣的膝盖肿胀;专门研究某一家作品或某一时期作品的人,常有这种不分皂白的溺爱。专家有从一而终的贞节,死心塌地的忠实,更如卑士麦所谓,崇拜和倾倒的肌肉特别发达,但是他们说不上文艺鉴赏,正像沙龙的女主人爱好的是艺术家,不是艺术,或影剧迷看中了明星,并非对剧艺真有兴趣。
“文如其人”这句话靠不住。许多人做起文来______尤其是政府或硬性的学术文字______一定要装点些文艺辞藻,扭捏出文艺姿态,说不尽的搔首弄姿。他们以为这样才算是“文”。“文如其女人”似乎更确切些;只希望女人千万别像这种文章。
                         (钱钟书《观察》周刊第四卷第二期一九四八年三月六日)

作者为什么对“不虞之誉”疾恶如仇:

A.丧失了创造性

B.缺乏智慧

C.求全责备

D.亦步亦趋