问题 单项选择题

(二)

甲、乙两人为广州市C区人,2000年3月双方在广州市A区登记结婚。婚后甲与乙居住在B区。2000年9月,甲被派到美国留学,一直未回。2002年双方中断联系,乙寄的信函被退回,因此乙打算提起离婚诉讼。据此,回答94—97题。

对本案的离婚诉讼,有管辖权的法院是:

A.A区人民法院

B.B区人民法院

C.属于涉外民事诉讼,应向广州市中级法院起诉

D.向甲出国前的住所地的人民法院起诉

答案

参考答案:B

解析: 参见《民诉意见》第15条,《民事诉讼法》第23条。

单项选择题
单项选择题

Arnold: I was recently denied a seat on an airline flight for which I had a confirmed reservation, because the airline had overbooked the flight. Since I was forced to fly on the next available flight, which did not depart until two hours later, I missed an important business meeting. Even though the flight on which I had a reservation was canceled at the last minute due to bad weather, the airline should still pay me compensation for denying me a seat on the flight.
Jamie: The airline is not morally obligated to pay you any compensation. Even of you had not been denied a seat on the earlier flight, you would have missed your business meeting anyway.
Which is the principle that, if established, justifies Jamie’s response to Arnold is that an airline is morally obligated to compensate a passenger who has been denied a seat on a flight for which the passenger has confirmed reservations

A.If the only reason the passenger is forced to take a later flight is that the airline overbooked the original flight.

B.Only if there is a reason the passenger is forced to take a later flight other than the original flight’s being canceled due to bad weather.

C.Only if the passenger would not have been forced to take a later flight and the airline not overbooked the original flight.

D.Even if the only reason the passenger is forced to take a later flight were that the original flight is canceled due to bad weather.

E.(E) Even if the passenger would still have been forced to take a later flight and the airline not overbooked the original flight.