问题 问答题

钱某是某公司的货车驾驶员,自2005年1月起,因运达公司效益不好,钱某想利用自己的专长,到社会上挣钱,便经常以病假为由不上班,在社会上开出租车。2006年2月8日,公司要求钱某提供医院开具的病假证明,钱某交不出来,且又无故旷工近一个月。2006年3月15日该公司以钱某无正当理由经常旷工已超过15天为由将其除名,并以严重违纪为由将解除劳动合同通知书面交钱某。钱某接到除名通知书后,向公司领导提出自己能够开出证明自己确实有病的假条,并承认错误,要求公司撤销除名决定,但此后又不按时上班。要求撤销除名决定遭公司拒绝后,钱某又多次找上级有关部门和他人从中协调,均无结果。2006年5月22日钱某向当地劳动争议仲裁委员会提出申诉。仲裁委员会经审查,钱某已超过申诉时效,答复钱某此案不予受理。(见《劳动法》)

答案

参考答案:此案是一起因申请仲裁超过时效,劳动争议仲裁委员会不予受理的案例。本案仲裁委员会的处理是正确的。《劳动法》0第82条规定,提出仲裁要求的一方当事人应当自劳动争议发生之日起60日内向劳动争议仲裁委员会提出书面申请。按劳动部《关于(中华人民共和国劳动法)若干条文的说明》(劳部发[1994]298号)的规定,劳动争议发生之日是指当事人知道或者应当知道其权利被侵害之日。
根据<劳动法》《企业劳动争议处理条例》(国务院117号令)、《劳动争议仲裁委员会办案规则》(劳部发[1993]276号)规定,劳动争议仲裁委员会对一般争议的处理时效为自组成仲裁庭之日起60日,对特别集体争议的处理时效为自组成仲裁庭之日起15日。仲裁委员会对劳动争议应在仲裁时效内审理结案。
另外,《劳动争议仲裁委员会办案规则》第30条还规定了仲裁时效延长的情况:仲裁庭处理劳动争议,应从组成仲裁庭之日起60日内结案。案情复杂需要延期的,报仲裁委员会批准后可适当延长,但最长延期不得超过30日。第43条规定:仲裁庭处理集体劳动争议,应当自组成仲裁庭之日起1 5日内结束。案情复杂需要延期的,经报仲裁委员会批准,可以适当延期.但是延长的期限不得超过15日。
劳动部关于《(企业劳动争议处理条例)若干问题解释》(劳部发[1993]244号)规定,企业开除职工、除名处理职工应发给通知书,辞退职工应发给证明书。职工对此不服,申请仲裁应提供该通知书或证明书。这就是说,除名争议的职工当事人,知道其权利被侵害之日,一般是指职工收到被除名的通知书之日,仲裁机关计算申诉时效应从此日开始。
本案中,职工钱某是在3月15日收到被除名通知书的,他知道自己权利被侵害之日应当是3月15日,应从3月15日开始,在60日内向劳动争议仲裁机关提出仲裁申请,即在5月17日前提出仲裁请求,而钱某直到5月22日才向劳动争议仲裁机关提出仲裁申诉,超过规定的仲裁时效(60天)。因此,劳动争议仲裁委员会不予受理符合法律规定。

判断题
单项选择题

In the United States, older people rarely live with their adult children. But in many other cultures children are expected to care (1) their aged parents. In some parts of Italy, the percentage of adult children who (2) with their parents (3) 65 to 70 percent. In Thailand, too, children are expected to take care of their elderly parents; few Thai elderly live (4) . What explains these differences in living arrangements (5) cultures Modernization theory (6) the extended family household to low levels of economic development. In traditional societies, the elderly live with their children in large extended family units for economic reasons. But with modernization, children move to urban areas, leaving old people (7) in (8) rural areas. Yet modernization theory cannot explain why extended family households were never common in the United States or England, or why families in Italy, which is fully modernized, (9) a p tradition of intergenerational living. Clearly, economic development alone cannot explain (10) living arrangements. Another theory associated intergenerational living arrangements with inheritance patterns. In some cultures, the stem family pattern of inheritance (11) . (12) this system, parents live with a married child, usually the oldest son, who then (13) their property when they die. The stem family system was once common in Japan, but changes in inheritance laws, (14) broader social changes brought (15) by industrialization and urbanization, have (16) the (17) .In 1960 about 80 percent of Japanese over 65 lived with their children; by 1990 only 60 percent did-a figure that is still high (18) U.S. standards, but which has been (19) steadily. In Korea, too, traditional living arrangements are (20) : the percentage of aged Koreans who live with a son declined from 77 percent in 1984 to 50 percent just 10 years later. Although most elderly Koreans still expect to live with a son, their adult children do not expect to live with their children when they grow old.

(18)是()

A.by

B.on

C.with

D.in