问题 单项选择题

If phone calls and web pages can be beamed through the air to portable devices, then why not electrical power, too It is a question many consumers and device manufacturers have been asking themselves for some time. But to seasoned observers of the electronics industry, the promise of wireless recharging sounds depressingly familiar. In 2004 Splashpower, a British technology firm, was citing “very p” interest from consumer-electronics firms for its wireless charging pad. Based on the principle of electromagnetic induction (EMI) that Faraday had discovered in the 19th century, the company’s “Splashpad” contained a coil that generated a magnetic field when a current flowed through it. When a mobile device containing a corresponding coil was brought near the pad, the process was reversed as the magnetic field generated a current in the second coil, charging the device’ s battery without the use of wires. Unfortunately, although Faraday’s principles of electromagnetic induction have stood the test of time, Splashpower has not — it was declared bankrupt last year without having launched a single product.

Thanks to its simplicity .and measurability, electromagnetic induction is still the technology of choice among many of the remaining companies in the wireless-charging arena. But, as Splashpower found, turning the theory into profitable practice is not straightforward. But lately there have been some promising developments.

The first is the formation in December 2008 of the Wireless Power Consortium, a body dedicated to establishing a common standard for inductive wireless charging, and thus promoting its adoption. The new consortium’s members include big consumer-electronics firms, such as Philips and Sanyo, as well as Texas Instruments, a chipmaker.

Fierce competition between manufacturers of mobile devices is also accelerating the introduction of wireless charging. The star of this year’s Consumer Electronics Show held in Las Vegas was the Pre, a smart-phone from Palm. The Pre has an optional charging pad, called the Touchstone, which uses electromagnetic induction to charge the device wirelessly.

As wireless-charging equipment based on electromagnetic induction heads towards the market, a number of alternative technologies are also being developed. PowerBeam, a start-up based in Silicon Valley, uses lasers to beam power from one place to another.

It now seems to be a matter of when, rather than if, wireless charging enters the mainstream. And if those in the field do find themselves languishing in the disillusionment, they could take some encouragement from Faraday himself. He observed that “nothing is too wonderful to be true if it be consistent with the laws of nature.” Not even a wirelessly rechargeable iPhone.

The author gives the example of Touchstone to show()

A. the smart phone Pre has enough creativeness to be the star of the show

B. intensified competition promotes the introduction of wireless charging

C. big companies have been trying hard to promote wireless charging

D. the Wireless Power Consortium has done a great job up till now

答案

参考答案:B

解析:

[设题点] 举例处

推理判断题。Touchstone出现在第四段末尾。一般来说,例子是用来支持作者的观点的,因此我们首先要找到作者的论点。本段的主题句是首句,提到移动设备制造商之间激烈的竞争加速了无线充电技术的引入,[B]项表达的正是此意,故为答案。[A]项是对第四段第二句和第三句的错误理解,举Pre为例只是为了证明激烈的竞争促进了无线充电技术的发展;[C]项推理无依据;[D]项错误明显, Touchstone是Palm推出的,与Wireless Power Consortium无关。

单项选择题 A1型题
单项选择题

说到成功,人们有一个错误观念:成功只等于成名.有人认为,只有扭转乾坤的壮举,才算是成功的举动;有人认为,只有领袖、名人、称得上“家”的人,才算是成功者;有人则干脆断言,世界上没有一个成功者,因为人生的最终结局是悲剧______后人肯定会超越前人.这实在是一种可怕的自卑.其实,我们都是成功者,因为成功只是一种感受,一种自我意识的主观感受.如果我们把自己的每一点进步,哪怕只是微小的进步,都看作是一次成功,都认认真真地品味一番,那么,幸福和快乐就会常伴在我们身边,我们的人生也就会因此而变得格外的丰富和生动,不是吗作为一名学生,他考试及格了,成绩提高了,这是成功,应该感到高兴;作为一个农民,他播下的种子发芽了,庄稼收割了,这也是成功,也应该感到高兴;在更多的时候无须旁人认可,更不需要别人来裁判;我们也不要把成功的刻度画得太高,不要把成功看得过于神圣.然而人的一生,不可能永远一帆风顺,不可避免要遭受这样那样的挫折和失败,每经过一次失败,对事物的认识就深入了一步,对人生的感悟就加深了许多,自己的意志就增加了不少.这种经历和感受,不就是另一种意义上的成功吗不也应该感到快乐吗否则,会对人生失去一份应有的自信,面对困难,我们就会望而却步.大胆而自豪地承认成功吧,认认真真地品味自己的每一次成功,从品味中汲取成功动力.开启智慧,从而获得更大的成功,这也许就是人生的意义所在.

作者认为每一个人都是成功者的原因是 ()

A.成功只是一种自我意识的主观感受

B.成功是每一个人的必然结果

C.生活中很多人都是一帆风顺的

D.努力就会成功是每一个人的追求目标