The senator has long held to the general printable that no true work of art is obscene and thus that there is no conflict between the need to encourage free artistic expression and the need to protect the sensibilities of the public from obscenity. When well-known works generally viewed as obscene are cited as possible counterexamples, the senator justifies accepting the principle by saying that if these works really are obscene then they cannot be works of art.
The senator’s reasoning contains which one of the following errors

A．It seeks to persuade by emotional rather than intellectual means.

B．It contains an implicit contradiction.

C．It relies on an assertion of the senator authority.

D．It assumes what it seeks to establish.

E．(E) It attempts to justify a position by appeal to an irrelevant consideration.

有关对地役权消灭原因的叙述中，不正确的是（）。

A.需役地对地役权利用的功能

B.需役地对供役地的建筑物地役权因建筑物被拆除而消灭

C.地役权人以明示的意思表示放弃其地役权的，其地役权消灭

D.混同需役地和供役地的所有权或者使用权归于同一民事主体时