问题 单项选择题

Rarely has there been as neat a fit between a book’s subject and its author’s biography as in "Bound Together: How Traders, Preachers, Adventurers, and Warriors Shaped Globalization" by Nayan Chanda. It’s easy to see why the subject fascinates Chanda; he’s a self-proclaimed Francophile(崇拜法国的人) of South Asian origin, who studied French in Calcutta, then took courses on China in Paris, ran a magazine in Hong Kong and ended up launching an online journal devoted to globalization at a venerable Ivy League institution. And in this engaging analysis, he answers such intriguing questions as" How did the coffee bean, first grown only in Ethiopia, end up in our coffee cups after a journey through Java and Colombia"

In examining these specific questions -- and larger ones about how the world is interconnected m Chanda does not emphasize his own experiences. But when appropriate, he effectively uses small, personal details to cut very big social, economic, cultural and sometimes biological processes down to size. He shows how close scrutiny of the iPod he gave his son as a birthday present can reveal much about the multinational origins of such objects. It was officially touted as" designed" by an American company and "assembled in China"; he found that it actually contained component parts and software with ties to India, Japan, South Korea and Scotland. And he marvels at the speed with which it traveled from Shanghai to New haven via Alaska and Indiana, as well as at his ability to track its progress thanks to bar codes.

The debate over globalization has grown so polarized that many readers are probably itching to know whether Chanda belongs in the" pro" or" anti" camp. One theme of "Bound Together" is that thinking in these terms doesn’t make sense. Those who gather at what are somewhat misleadingly called" anti- globalization" rallies, after all, don’t oppose all the ways the world is shrinking. And their campaigns make use of many technologies (notably the Internet) that are crucial to 21st-century-style globalization.

Indeed, Chanda’s stand on the subject might be called that of a cautiously optimistic fatalist. He asserts that the only reasonable response to globalization is twofold: accept that the world is not going to stop shrinking and figure out ways to maximize the positive and minimize the negative effects. He acknowledges the downsides of globalization (social inequities, the spread of new diseases and so on), yet argues that in many ways being "bound together" ever more tightly can ultimately be a good thing, benefiting more and more individuals and groups.

This is a book filled with fascinating information. Even readers who disagree with his claims will come away with a host of new facts to draw upon. They will also learn a lot about the history and deployment of the term globalization, to which Chanda devotes an excellent chapter. In addition, many will never look at an iPod in quite the same way again.

In the author’s opinion, those who oppose globalization are ()

A. against all the ways and means related to it

B. not accepting the reality of a shrinking world

C. misunderstood for the name of their camp

D. against the technologies typical of globalization

答案

参考答案:C

解析:

本题为观点态度题。文章第3段说那些反对全球化的人“don’t oppose all the ways the world is shrinking.”所以A和B不正确。文中说“their campaigns make use of many technologies crucial to 21(上标)st century-style globalization”所以D不恰当。C正确,因为他们被“misleadingly called‘anti-globalization’rallies”,“misleading”意为“令人误解的”。

阅读理解

阅读短文,选择正确答案。

     "Tom? Are you in bed yet?" called Mrs.White. There was no answer. Mrs. White put down her book and

went to her 14-year-old son's room. Tom was sitting in front of a bright computer screen on which a motorbike

was running fast.

     "Oh, Tom. You're still playing on that computer game. You must stop now, it's half past eleven. If you don't

go to bed soon, you'll be very tired tomorrow," said Mrs. White. 

     "But I've nearly won the game," Tom said to Mrs. White. She could see the excitement on his face. She sat

down beside him. 

     "You're always playing on the computer. You spend more time on this machine than on your homework."

      Today more and more families have computers. Parents hope computers can help their children improve

their study at school. But many of their children use computers to play games and watch videos instead of

studying. We often see that computer net bars are crowded with people, especially young boys. They spend a lot

of money competing (竞争) with the computerized (用计算机控制的) machines. The more they lose, the more

they want to win. The result is that they don't want to work or study.

     In some countries, even scientists hate computers. They say computers cause millions of people to lose their

jobs or cause them a lot of trouble. Computer game addiction (瘾) is a serious problem in social (社会的) life.

Something has to be done to solve the problem.

1. How did Mrs. White feel when she saw her son playing late? [ ]

A. She felt excited.

B. She felt happy.

C. She felt worried.

D. She felt wonderful.

2. Parents hope computers can _______. [ ]

A. help their children improve their study at school

B. help their children play well

C. help their children know a lot of Internet knowledge

D. help their children relax themselves

3. Many children use computers to _______. [ ]

A. watch videos

B. listen to songs

C. play games

D. A、B and C

4. The writer thinks _______. [ ]

A. the boys can go to the computer net bars, but the girls can't

B. the computer net bars are very useful

C. the children spend too much money on computer games

D. the children should play computer games

5. Why do some scientists hate computers? [ ]

A. They think computers cause millions of people to lose their jobs.

B. They think computers cause them a lot of trouble.

C. They think it's a waste of time to use computers.

D. Both A and B.

填空题