问题 综合题

阅读有关日本明治维新的材料,回答问题:(13分)

材料一  “广兴会议,万机决于公论;上下一心,大展经纶;公卿与武家同心,以至于庶民,须使各遂其志,人心不倦;破历来之陋习,立基于天地之公;求知识于世界,大振皇基。”

——1868年明治政府《五条誓约》

材料二 有关明治维新时期的图片

材料三 涩泽荣一(1840~1931年),被誉为“日本实业之父”。他提倡“《论语》加算盘”。强调“要广泛地给人民以好处,帮助大家过好日子,就得有钱”,也就是说不能丢开经济来空谈政治。他又强调“孔子之教与富是一致的,为富不仁是不对的,实行仁义才能得到真富”。他说:“我的事业是喻义不喻利,国家必须的事业,就把获利放在第二位,在‘义’上该兴办的事业,就干起来,手攥着股票,面对实际,谋取利益,把事业经营下去。”——摘自《涩泽子爵·话论语》

(1)材料一表达的中心思想是什么?(2分)

(2)从材料二中你获得哪些历史信息?扼要谈谈其对日本发展的积极影响。(6分)

(3)据材料三,谈谈你对涩泽荣一提倡“《论语》加算盘”的理解?(5分)

答案

 

问答题

Passage 2 A Different Consensus Even as the U.S. Senate debates a vast new tax and spend regime in the name of fighting climate change, a more instructive argument was taking place in Copenhagen, Denmark. Some of the world’s leading economists met earlier this month to decide how to do the most good in a world of finite resources. Scarcity is a core economic concept. There isn’t an unlimited amount of money to be spent on every problem, so choices have to be made. The question addressed by the Copenhagen Consensus Center is what investments would do the most good for the most people. The center’s blue-ribbon panel of economists, including five Nobel laureates, weighed more than 40 proposals to improve the world by spending a total of $75 billion over the next four years. What would do the most good most economically Supplements of vitamin A and zinc for malnourished children. Number two A successful outcome to the Doha Round of global flee-trade talks. Global warming mitigation It ranked 30th, or last, right behind global warming mitigation research and development. On the benefits of freer trade, it was estimated that a successful Doha Round could generate up to $113 trillion in new wealth during the 21st century, at a cost of $420 billion or less from inefficient industries going bust. Meanwhile, providing vitamin A and zinc would help some 112 million children in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia for merely $60 million a year. The minerals would help prevent blindness and stunted growth—increasing lifetime productivity by an estimated $1 billion. Similar if not quite so bountiful returns apply to investments in iron supplements, salt iodization and deworming, all low-cost measures that the economists in Copenhagen ranked highly.

单项选择题 A3/A4型题