问题 单项选择题

以下各题基于以下题干:
东宇大学公开招聘3个教师职位,哲学学院、管理学院和经济学院各一个。每个职位都有分别来自南山大学、西京大学、北清大学的候选人。有位“聪明”人士李先生对招聘结果做出了如下预测:
如果哲学学院录用北清大学的候选人,那么管理学院录用西京大学的候选人;
如果管理学院录用南山大学的候选人,那么哲学学院也录用南山大学的候选人;
如果经济学院录用北清大学或者西京大学的候选人,那么管理学院录用北清大学的候选人。

如果哲学学院、管理学院和经济学院最终录用的候选人的大学归属信息依次如下,则哪项符合李先生的预测

A. 南山大学、南山大学、西京大学。
B. 北清大学、南山大学、南山大学。
C. 北清大学、北清大学、南山大学。
D. 西京大学、北清大学、南山大学。
E. 西京大学、西京大学、西京大学。

答案

参考答案:D

解析: 考查条件判断的真假性质。选项D符合李先生的预测。因为哲学学院、管理学院和经济学院最终录用的候选人依次为西京大学、北清大学、南山大学,则李先生的断定“如果哲学学院录用北清大学的候选人,那么管理学院录用西京大学的候选人”,前件假且后件假,整个断定为真;“如果管理学院录用南山大学的候选人,那么哲学学院也录用南山大学的候选人”,前件假且后件假,整个断定为真;“如果经济学院录用北清大学或者西京大学的候选人,那么管理学院录用北清大学的候选人”,前件假且后件真,整个断定为真。其他选项都不符合李先生的预测,都会使李先生的预测为假。比如选项A。若哲学学院、管理学院和经济学院最终录用的候选人依次为南山大学、南山大学、西京大学,则李先生的断定“如果经济学院录用北清大学或者西京大学的候选人,那么管理学院录用北清大学的候选人”,前件真且后件假,整个断定为假。

多项选择题
阅读理解

A person named Bernard Jackson today is a free man, but he has many bitter memories. He spent five years in prison after a jury (陪审团) wrongly convicted (判处……有罪) him of raping two women. At Jackson’s trial, although two witnesses testified that Jackson was with them in another location at the time of the crime, he was convicted anyway. Why? The jury believed the testimony (证词) of the two victims, who positively identified Jackson as the man who had attacked them. The court eventually freed Jackson after the police found the real criminal.

Many factors influence the accuracy of eyewitness testimony. For instance, witnesses sometimes see photographs of several suspects before they try to identify the person they saw in a group of people. They can become confused by seeing many photographs of similar faces. The number of people in the group, and whether it is a person or a photograph, may also affect a witness’s decision. People sometimes have difficulty identifying people of other races. The questions the police ask witnesses also have an effect on them.

Many people believe that police officers are more reliable than ordinary people. Psychologists decided to test this idea, and they discovered that it is not true. Two psychologists showed a film of crimes to both police officers and civilians. The psychologists found no difference between the police and the civilians in correctly remembering the details of the crimes.

Despite all the possibilities for inaccuracy, courts cannot leave out eyewitness testimony from a trial. American courts depend almost completely on eyewitness testimony to resolve (决定) court cases. Sometimes it is the only evidence to a crime, such as rape. Furthermore, eyewitness testimony is often correct. Although people do sometimes make mistakes, and convict innocent people, more importantly, eyewitness testimony has rightly convicted a larger number of guilty people.

American courts depend on the ability of the twelve jurors, and not the judges, to determine the accuracy of the witness’s testimony. It is their responsibility to decide if a certain witness could actually see, hear and remember what happened.

小题1:Bernard Jackson was found guilty and sentenced 5 years’ prison because          .

A.the police discovered evidence leading to his guilt

B.he admitted the crime of raping two women

C.the victims insisted that he was the attacker

D.the eyewitness proved the victims’ testimony小题2:The following statements may be the reasons for why sometimes the eyewitness’ testimony is not accurate EXCEPT          .

A.the eyewitness is confused by the police’s questions

B.the eyewitness is shown photos of many similar faces

C.the eyewitness lacks the professional help from police

D.the eyewitness can’t identify people of other races clearly小题3:An inaccurate eyewitness testimony may lead to        .

A.the misunderstanding of the case

B.the disbelief in the court

C.the disrespect for the eyewitness

D.the conviction of an innocent person小题4:Eyewitness testimony is important because        .

A.it can be relied on to detect criminals in all cases.

B.it is sometimes the only way to resolve court cases.

C.it is sometimes the only clue for police investigation.

D.it is more reliable than physical evidences to a crime.小题5:According to the text, we can infer that          .

A.police identification is more reliable than that of the ordinary people

B.eyewitness testimony is valuable, though sometimes incorrect.

C.crime victims often fail to give positive identification of the suspects

D.the jury relies on the judge rather than the eyewitness for a decision