问题 单项选择题

伏尔泰以天纵之资,博览群书,吃掉了的东西自己加以消化,作为营养,为他的“理性哲学”服务。伏尔泰涉猎的诸“家”当中,中国只是不很重要的“一家”,并不是“情有独钟”:用显微镜把它单挑出来像“特写镜头”一样放大,那不是“幻觉”,也是“错觉”。 这段文字主要说明( )。

A.伏尔泰用中国素材为其“理性哲学”服务

B.中国素材在伏尔泰的哲学体系中占重要地位

C.夸大中国因素在伏尔泰哲学体系中的作用是不对的

D.伏尔泰用“特定镜头”的方式来描绘中国

答案

参考答案:C

解析: 从文中第一句可以得出伏尔泰“博览群书”为他的“理性哲学”服务,所以A项错误;从“中国只是不很重要的‘一家’,并不是‘隋有独钟’”一句可知道,选项B明显错误;由文中最后一句可知,用“特写镜头”的并不是伏尔泰;选项C是正确的。

单项选择题
填空题



The Commission is expected to propose allowing people to choose which legal jurisdiction they would come under, based on their (1) or their residency. But the proposal is set to (2) because of the very different laws on divorce that apply across the EU. The Commission wants to (3) problems over which law to apply when, for example, a married couple from one member state is (4) in another member state or when the couple is of different EU nationalities.
The (5) of member states are said to be (6) the idea and responded positively to a (6) which followed the (8) of a Commission Green Paper. With 15 percent of German divorces each year involving couples of different nationalities, the government of Berlin (9) see resolved the issue of which laws should apply.
But some member states are expected to resist the (10) which would involve allowing different divorce laws to be applied in their countries. For example, in Ireland where the divorce law states a couple must have been separated for four years, establish that their marriage has broken down and be offered (11) , a couple from Sweden could apply to an Irish court to allow them to divorce under Swedish law, where divorce can be (12) quickly.
The Irish government’s (13) to the Commission on the Green Paper stated: "Ireland is not in favor of allowing (14) to choose the applicable law, as this could be open to abuse.., such abuse would be likely to (15) most on divorce regimes, such as that of Ireland, which require a relatively long separation period." Ireland, like the UK, however, is allowed to choose whether to "opt-in" to such a proposal under rules agreed in the Amsterdam treaty. Malta has no such (16) but could (17) the proposal in the Council of Ministers since (18) approval will be required.
"It is going to lead to (19) ," said Geoffrey Shannon, Irish expert on the Commission on European Family Law, which examines the (20) of EU family law.
The proposal would also mean that judges would have to be trained in the divorce law of all 25 member states.