问题 阅读理解与欣赏

阅读下面的文字,完成12—16题。(20分)

过河拆桥

[阿根廷]博尔赫斯

圣地亚哥的一个教长想学巫术,他经过多方打听,知道了离此不远的特莱多市的巫师堂伊南是个高手,就上门求教。

他找到堂伊南家时,正是中午,这位巫师热情地请他吃饭,饭后又为他倒上了难得喝到的法国咖啡。教长这才得到机会,说明了来意。堂伊南站起来走了几步,说,我不收弟子。教长很执着,再三要求。堂伊南说,我已看出你将会有远大前程,但教你巫术以后,我怕你会过河拆桥,忘恩负义,所以不能教你。教长忙起誓,那是不可能的事,假如我真的发达了,我一定会报答你,上帝可以作证。堂伊南听他说得很有诚意,就相信了他。

堂伊南先叫来女仆,吩咐她晚饭准备烤乳鸽,但别忙着烤,等他发话时再烤。然后他掀开房中的一块大铁板,示意教长跟来,他们就顺着石板梯子下去,堂伊南解释说学巫术最怕有人打扰,所以要找一个僻静的地方。石梯很长,走了约有十分钟才到了尽头,来到了一间放着各种巫术器具的实验室,教长觉得他们似乎已经来到了地底深处。

堂伊南拿来一些巫书,正要给他讲解,有两个牧师匆匆而来给教长送一封信,信上说他那个当地区主教的叔叔病危,要他赶回去见最后一面。教长急得像热窝上的蚂蚁,不知怎么办才好。最后他还是不愿放弃学巫术的机会,就写了封回信表示慰问,让来人带给主教。两天后,几个着丧服的人来了,说主教已经病故,正在选继承人,而教长也有中选的希望,还说教长不必赶着回去,因为他本人不在场被选中则更加说明他是深孚众望。

果然十天后,两个衣着华丽的牧师来了,一见面就匍匐在地,吻他的手,称他主教大人。堂伊南也是喜出望外,一边向他祝贺一边为自己的儿子谋求空出的教长职位,主教对他说,教长的位置已经留给了主教的弟弟,不过可以另给好处,提出三人一起去圣地亚哥。

三人到圣地亚哥上任。六个月后,教皇派使者来宣旨,任命他为洛萨大主教。堂伊南忙请求把空出的主教位置给自己的儿子。大主教说这个位置已给了自己的叔父,不过可以另给他好处,提出三人一起去托洛萨,堂伊南只得同意。

两年后,教皇又任命他为红衣主教,堂伊南立刻提醒他以前作出的承诺,并为自己的儿子请求那个空出的大主教职位。红衣主教说这个位置已经留给了自己的舅舅,不过可以另给他好处,提出三人一起去罗马,堂伊南无法可想只得同意。他们到了罗马受到了隆重接待,还举行了弥撒和游行。

四年后教皇逝世,红衣大主教被选为教皇。堂伊南听到这个消息,又一次找到教皇,他吻了教皇陛下的脚,提醒他以前的承诺,为自己的儿子请求红衣主教的职位。教皇闻言大怒,让手下把他投入监狱,说他一个小小的巫师竟敢要挟教皇。可怜的堂伊南连连认错,请求宽恕,并说自己与儿子这一辈子都在外荒废了,现在只好准备回老家,因路途遥远,请教皇给一点路上吃的东西,教皇不予理睬。于是堂伊南站了起来,在教皇鸦雀无声的森严的大堂上,旁若无人地大声说道:“那我只得吃我为今晚准备的烤乳鸽了。”

女仆应声出来开始烤乳鸽。教皇这才发现自己实际上还在特莱多的一个地下室里,只是圣地亚哥的一个小小教长。他为自己的食言而羞红了脸,结结巴巴不知说什么好。堂伊南不再请他吃烤乳鸽,只是客客气气地把他送出了地下室。

12.试分析第二段“我怕你会过河拆桥,忘恩负义,所以不能教你”这句话在小说中的作用。(3分)

                                                                      

                                                                      

                                                                      

                                                                      

13.博尔赫斯的小说情节充满“想像力”,请概括该小说的情节并加以简析。(4分)

                                                                      

                                                                      

                                                                      

                                                                      

14.小说以“梦”为依托虚构情节,极富“想象力”,这与中国的哪个故事非常相像?它们由此表现的主旨有何不同?请加以简析。(4分)

                                                                      

                                                                      

                                                                      

                                                                      

15.有的译者将这篇小说的标题译为“向后靠的巫师”,你认为哪一个更好?请说明理由。(5分)

                                                                      

                                                                      

                                                                      

                                                                      

16.结合作品内容,赏析文中教长的形象。(4分)

                                                                      

                                                                      

                                                                      

                                                                      

答案

12.①小说围绕这句话展开想像,推动了情节发展。②通过梦的考验,证明教长是一个忘恩负义之徒,点化了人物性格。③与最后一段形成首尾照应,使小说结构严谨。

13.作家将复杂多变的故事浓缩在一个梦里。在梦中,教长连升三级,由教长升为主教,由主教而升为红衣大主教,由红衣大主教再升为教皇,三次拒绝了巫师为儿子的求职。梦的设置使其不受时间和空间顺序的约束,女仆和牧师可以在别人的梦中进进出出,“迷宫”式的地下室里离奇的情节和现实生活并置共存,亦实亦虚,亦幻亦真,引人入胜。

14.唐传奇小说《南柯太守传》,“南柯一梦”也可。南柯一梦表现人生虚幻无常,用以借喻世间荣华富贵不过是一场空梦而已。而《过河拆桥》则通过对教长这一人物形象的刻画,讽刺批判了现实中那些背信弃义忘恩负义的人,揭露了他们丑恶的灵魂。

15.“过河拆桥”这个标题更好,因为这个标题一针见血地揭示了忘恩负义的人性弱点。/“向后靠的巫师”这个标题更好,因为这个标题能具体地呈现巫师的可怜相,而且能生动地反映出正统主流的教会冲击下民间巫师的窘境。

16.①花言巧语,为达目的不顾亲情;②过河拆桥,忘恩负义,背信弃义。

12.答出两点即可。

13.概括情节2分,分析其作用2分。

14.举例和分析各2分。所举例子应当与选文在情节、构思或主题上相似。

15.考生可以自由发挥,只要能自圆其说即可

16.①花言巧语2分;②背信弃义2分。

单项选择题
单项选择题

It was two years ago today that the hunting ban came into force, supposedly ending centuries of tradition. However, the law has been an unmitigated failure—not that either side is shouting about it.
It was a nightmare vision that struck fear and loathing into the hearts of millions. When the hunting ban became law, it was said, 16,000 people would lose their jobs, thousands of hounds would be put down, rotting carcasses would litter the countryside, hedgerows would disappear, riders would face on-the-spot fines, law-abiding people from doctors to barristers would be dragged from their horses and carted off to prison, while dog owners would be prosecuted if their mutt caught a rabbit.
These were just some of the claims as desperate countryside campaigners battled to save their sport in the lead—up to the hunting ban, which Labour rammed into law using the Parliament Act on November 18, 2004.
For many, the fears were real. Others exaggerated as they fought an increasingly aggressive anti-hunting lobby which had rejected acres of independent evidence affirming that hunting is the most humane way of killing foxes. In the battle to "fight prejudice, fight the ban", every emotive argument was deployed.
For its part, the anti-hunting brigade extravagantly claimed that the ban would put an end to the rich parading in red jackets. A senior Labour MP, Peter Bradley, admitted in this newspaper that it was, as many suspected, about "class war". He lost his seat shortly afterwards. But people in red coats did not disappear.
In fact, none of the forecasts came true. What did happen was something nobody had predicted: the spectacular revival and growth of hunting with hounds. In short, the hunting ban has been a failure.
Today, on the second anniversary of the ban’s coming into force on February 18, 2005, new figures show that participation in the sport has never been higher. It is so cheerful that two new packs have been formed, something that has not happened for centuries.
They include the seductively named Private Pack, set up by the financier Roddy Fleming in Gloucestershire. It operates on an invitation—only basis, a sort of hunting private members’ club. This can only mean one thing: like it or not, hunting is cool. Young people are taking it up, enticed by the element of rebellion and the mystique of what actually happens as hunts attempt to keep within the law.

As a result of the ban, ______.

A.hunting activities have become more secretive

B.people have become more curious about hunting

C.citizens have become more confused by the law

D.the country tradition has been radically shaken