问题 单项选择题

Marriage, and its many ups and downs, still exercises a powerful hold over newspapers, magazines and the airwaves. Nearly 23m Americans watched Prince William being joined in holy marriage to Kate Middleton. Millions more have indulged in the break-up of Arnold Schwarzenegger’s marriage after revelations that he fathered a son with a maid.

Less delightful are revelations about the sorry state of marriage across the United States. Data from the Census Bureau show that married couples, for the first time, now make up less than half of all households.

The iconic American family, with mom, dad and kids under one roof, is fading. In every state the numbers of unmarried couples, childless households and single-person households are growing faster than those comprised of married people with children, finds the 2010 census. And the trend has a potent class dimension. Traditional marriage has evolved from a near-universal ritual to a luxury for the educated and affluent.

There barely was a marriage gap in 1960: only four percentage points separated the wedded ways of college and high-school graduates(76% versus 72%). The gap has since widened to 16 percentage points, according to the Pew Research Centre.

"Marriage has become much more selective, and that’s why the divorce rate has come down," said Bradford Wilcox, director of the National Marriage Project at the University of Virginia in Charlottesville. The project found that divorce rates for couples with college degrees are only a third as high as for those with a high-school degree.

Americans with a high-school degree or less tell researchers they would like to marry, but do not believe they can afford it. Instead, they raise children out of wedlock. Only 6% of children born to college-educated mothers were born outside marriage, according to the National Marriage Project. That compares with 44% of babies born to mothers whose education ended with high school.

"Less marriage means less income and more poverty," reckons Isabel Sawhill, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution. She and other researchers have linked as much as half of the income inequality in America to changes in family composition: single-parent families (mostly those with a high-school degree or less) are getting poorer while married couples (with educations and dual incomes) are increasingly well-off. "This is a striking gap that is not well understood by the public," she says.

Do not expect the Democratic Party, however, to make an issue of the marriage gap in next year’s elections. Unmarried women voted overwhelmingly for Barack Obama. "You don’t want to suggest to someone who isn’t married and has children that they should be married," says Ms Sawhill. "That is a scorn on their lifestyle.

According to the text, traditional marriage ()

A. is no longer considered holy and meaningful

B. is doomed to be replaced by new forms

C. tends to be kept by the wealthy and cultivated

D. enables couples to be loyal to each other

答案

参考答案:C

解析:

[试题类型] 具体信息题。

[解题思路] 根据题干关键词traditional marriage定位至第二段末句。该句明确指出了传统婚姻的变化:已经从一个几乎普遍适用的模式(near universal ritual)演变为受教育人群和富裕人群的奢侈品(a luxury for the educated and affluent)。选项[C]“更易为富人以及有文化的人所维持”与此相符,其中wealthy对应原句的affluent,而cultivated对应educated,故选项[C]为答案。

[干扰排除] 选项[A]属于无中生有,文章多处提到现在美国结婚的夫妻更少了,但并没有提到“传统婚姻不再神圣,不再有意义了”,故选项[A]无从推知。选项[B]意为“(传统婚姻)注定要被新的婚姻形式取代”,第三段虽然提到了新的家庭模式:unmarried couples, childless households and single-person households,但作者在文中只说明了这些新的家庭形式增长迅速,并没有说明“新的家庭模式会取代传统婚姻”,故选项[B]也可排除。选项[D]“(传统婚姻)使得夫妇彼此忠诚”在文中无出处,作者没有提及婚姻中夫妇的忠诚度问题,故排除该项。

计算题
单项选择题