搜题请搜索小程序“爱下问搜题”
问题 填空题

某次大奖赛有7个评委同时为一位选手打分，去掉一个最高分和一个最低分，其余5个分数的平均值为该名参赛者的最后得分。请填空完成规定的功能。
Sub Command1_Click()
Dim mark!，aver!，i%，max1!，min1!
aver=0
For i=1 To 7
mark=InputBox("请输入第"＆i＆"位评委的打分")
If i=1 Then
max1=mark：min1=mark
Else
If mark＜min1 Then
min1=mark
ElseIf mark＞max1 Then
(14)
End If
End If
(15)
Next i
aver=(aver-max1-min1)/5
MsgBox aver
End Sub

答案

参考答案：aver=aver+mark或avet=mark+aver

解析： 最后得分的计算是先找出7位评委给出的分数中的最高分和最低分，然后执行“(总分-最高分-最低分)/5”得出的结果就是最后得分。程序首先定义了变量aver，并赋初值0，该变量用于存放最后得分。通过for循环“For i=1 To 7”，依次收集评委打分，并判断出最高分和最低分。通过语句“mark=InputBox("请输入第"＆i＆"位评委的打分")”依次获得了7位评委的打分，然后通过“If i=1 Then max1=mark：min1=mark”语句，将第1位评委的打分mark的值赋给变量max1和min1，通过语句“If mark＜min1 Then min1=mark”将其他某评委打的分与最低分进行比较，如果其他某评委打的分小于最低分，则将其赋值给min1，即使得min1的值始终保持最低分。否则通过ElseIf判断mark的值是否大于max1，如果大于，则将mark的值赋给max1，即使得max1的值始终保持最高分，所以第14空应该填“max1=maik”。当退出If判断后，需要将当前分数累加到总分aver中，因此第15空填“aver=aver+mark”，最后通过语句“aver=(aver-max1-min1)/5”得出最后得分。

单项选择题

要论中国人，必须不被搽在表面的白欺欺人的脂粉所诓骗，却看看他的筋骨和脊梁。自信力的有无，状元、宰相的文章是不足为据的，要自己去看地底下。 这一句话的含义，分析正确的是( )。

A．自信力的有无，不要只看上层统治阶级，而应到抗日的革命斗争中去发现，因为中国的“脊梁”在他们中间

B．自信力的有无，不要从统治阶级那里去找，而应从处于地下状态的党领导的革命斗争中去找，因为中国的“脊梁”在他们中间

C．自信力的有无，不要从统治阶级或上层人士的舆论上看，而应该到广大人民群众中去发现，因为中国的“脊梁”在他们中间

D．自信力的有无，不要只从中国革命斗争中的先进分子那里去找，而应该到广大人民群众中去发现，因为中国的“脊梁”在他们中间
查看答案
单项选择题

The Supreme Court will hear arguments about the use of public money for the private schooling of children with special needs. It’s interesting to note what’s not at issue: namely, that when a public school system is unable to provide an appropriate education, it is obligated to pay the costs of private school. Too bad poor children don’t have that unshakable right; if they did, there would be no controversy about the District program that gives vouchers to low-income children to attend private schools.

The case to be heard by the court hinges on whether parents have to enroll a child with special needs in public school before the child can attend private school at public expense. Special-education advocates say students shouldn’t have to waste time before being placed in a setting that best suits their needs, while school boards worry about a ruling that could amount to an unfettered fight to private schooling at public expense. What strikes us about the emotionally charged debate is the acceptance by both sides that sometimes it is appropriate to use public money to pay for a child to go to a private school. So, why all the arguments about the approximately$14 million for a federally funded program that lets 1,700 D. C. students attend private schools instead of failing public schools

To hear critics of the D. C. Opportunity Scholarship Program tell it, the use of public money for private schooling is as unprecedented as it is undesirable. In addition to the billions of dollars spent annually on private school tuitions for students with disabilities, private schools get public money for books, technology and teacher training. As long as the money is seen as benefiting the child, it is considered a proper, even desirable, use of public dollars.

Don’t get us wrong. We’re not arguing for the unilateral right of parents to enroll their sons and daughters in any school they wish with the taxpayers picking up the bill. Abuse of special-education policies has contributed to increased costs that threaten to take needed money from general public education funds. Safeguards are needed. Public schools should be pressed to do a better job for students with disabilities and students without. But there are schools in Washington where statistics show that failure is almost guaranteed. If a school system can’t educate a child—whether because of acute special needs or its own historical failings—why should that child not have options for a " free appropriate public education "

What does the word " unfettered " (Line 4, Para. 2)mean（）

A. Unlimited

B. Extreme

C. Unwanted

D. Ultimate
查看答案