问题 问答题

A饮用水有限公司是B国际有限公司与C股份有限公司、D工业公司于2002年成立的有限责任公司,其中B方投资占60%、C方投资占 30%,D方投资占10%。A公司股东会选举产生了公司董事会、监事会和经营管理机构,董事长由B公司委派王某担任,总经理由董事会聘任的李某出任。“碧纯”牌蒸馏水是A饮用水有限公司的产品。“碧纯”水投放市场后,先后获得一系列荣誉称号,2004年,“碧纯”水在当地的市场占有串为 43%。
2004年9月,A公司董事长王某投资成立碧纯饮料有限公司,并称其为“碧纯”品牌的权利人,获得了企业名称登记。王某兼任碧纯饮料有限公司董事长。2004年12月,碧纯公司生产“延中”牌饮用水。碧纯饮料有限公司擅自在其生产、销售的“延中”饮用水的产品装潢上及广告等宣传中,突出“碧纯”名称并仿冒“碧纯”蒸馏水产品的装潢,造成经销商与消费者的误认误购。这些行为造成A公司的直接经济损失,而且损害了“碧纯”品牌的声誉。由于A公司的董事长及部分董事同时又在碧纯饮料有限公司任职,C公司指派到A公司的三名董事数次要求召集A公司的董事会会议,洽谈合资公司“碧纯”品牌遭到侵权的问题,但均遭到拒绝,致使A公司无法正常行使权利,并由此造成投资C公司和D公司的合法权利受到侵害。
要求:根据本题给出的上述内容,回答下列问题:
(1)本案例中的A公司董事的行为是否符合公司法的规定请说明理由。
(2)A公司董事长拒绝召集董事会会议,依法应如何处理
(3)A公司的股东C公司或者D公司是否可以提起股东诉讼为什么
(4)请问股东对公司董事提起股东代表诉讼的程序有哪些

答案

参考答案:(1)根据《公司法》第149条规定,董事、高级管理人员未经股东会同意,不得利用职务便利为自己或者他人谋取属于公司的商业机会,自营或者为他人经营与所任职公司同类的业务。
(2)根据《公司法》第48条规定董事会会议由董事长召集和主持;董事长不能履行职务或者不履行职务的,由副董事长召集和主持;副董事长不能履行职务或者不履行职务的,由半数以上董事共同推举一名董事召集和主持。
(3)可以,因为A公司的董事长违反了公司法规定的董事义务给公司造成损失,公司拒绝或者怠于向违法行为人请求损害赔偿时,具备法定资格的股东有权代表其他股东,代替公司提起诉讼,请求董事长王某等赔偿公司损失。
(4)股东对公司董事提起诉讼的程序:首先,股东通过监事会或者监事提起诉讼,如果监事会收到上述股东的书面请求后拒绝提起诉讼。或者自收到请求之日起30日内未提起诉讼,或者情况紧急、不立即提起诉讼将会使公司利益受到难以弥补的损害的,股东有权直接向人民法院提起诉讼。

单项选择题
选择题

阅读理解

     Lake Champlain is on the borders of New York and Vermont. An explorer named Samuel De

Champlain is regarded as the first person to see a monster in it. This is reported to have happened in 1609,

but this may not have been the first sighting of the monster known as Champ.

     A reporter in the 1960's found that the sighting may not have been in the lake at all. It is more likely that

the first sighting was off the coast of the St. Lawrence estuary (河口).  In all likelihood, the first sighting of

the lake monster in the lake itself took place at Port Henry, New York, in 1819 by settlers in the territory.

The sightings continued, and in 1883 the sheriff (州长) of Clinton County, Nathan Mooney, described

witnessing " an enormous snake that was 25 to 30 feet in length".

     Sandra Mansi and her husband were vacationing in Vermont. When the lake monster appeared, they

took a picture of Champ. The picture was analyzed and it was concluded that the photo was real. It has

been speculated (推测) that the monster may be a creature known as a plesiosaur (颈项龙), which lived many centuries ago.

     Lake Champlain has depths of up to 400 feet, and is an outlet to the Atlantic Ocean. There is plenty of

food there, which supports the existence of such a creature.  Lake Champlain also has a water temperature

that is ideal for such a creature. In recent years a smaller creature has been seen with the large one. Could

there be a family of these creatures in the lake reproducing their yet unknown species now? Only time will

give us the answers that we seek.

1. Where did the first sighting of Champ in the lake most probably happen?

A. Off the coast of the St. Lawrence estuary.

B. At Port Henry.

C. In the Clinton County.

D. In Vermont.

2. Which of the following have the scientists concluded?

A. That the monster belongs to a known species.

B. That the picture taken by Sandra Mansi is real.

C. That the monster is the offspring of the plesiosaur.

D. When and where the lake monsters were first seen

3. What can we learn from the passage?

A. The snake-like monster may have swum there from the Atlantic Ocean.

B. Champ has had so many babies that they can be seen everywhere in the lake.

C. The first recorded story about the Lake Champlain monster was in 1609.

D. Enough food and a suitable water temperature is evidence that Champ can live there