问题 单项选择题

Many things make people think artists are weird—the odd hours, the nonconformity, the clove cigarettes. However, the weirdest may be this: artists’ only jobs are to explore emotions, and yet they choose to focus on the ones that feel lousy. This wasn’t always so. The earliest forms of art, like painting and music, are those best suited for expressing joy. But somewhere in the 19th century, more artists began seeing happiness as insipid, phony or, worst of all, boring. In the 20th century, classical music became more atonal, visual art more unsettling.

Sure, there have been exceptions, but it would not be a stretch to say that for the past century or so, serious art has been at war with happiness. In 1824, Beethoven completed his " Ode to Joy " . In 1962, novelist Anthony Burgess used it in A Clockwork Orange as the favorite music of his ultra-violent antihero.

You could argue that art became more skeptical of happiness because modem times have seen such misery. But the reason may actually be just the opposite: there is too much happiness in the world today.

In the West, before mass communication and literacy, the most powerful mass medium was the church, which reminded worshippers that their souls were in peril and that they would someday be meat for worms. Today the messages that the average Westerner is bombarded with are not religious but commercial, and relentlessly happy. Since these messages have an agenda—to pry our wallets from our pockets—they make the very idea of happiness seem bogus. " Celebrate! " commanded the ads for the arthritis drug Celebrex, before we found out it could increase the risk of heart attack.

What we forget—what our economy depends on us forgetting—is that happiness is more than pleasure without pain. The things that bring the greatest joy carry the greatest potential for loss and disappointment. Today, surrounded by promises of easy happiness, we need someone to tell us that it is OK not to be happy, that sadness makes happiness deeper. As the wine connoisseur movie Sideways tells us, it is the kiss of decay and mortality that makes grape juice into Pinot Noir. We need art to tell us, as religion once did, that you will die, that everything ends, and that happiness comes not in denying this but in living with it. It’s a message even more bitter than a clove cigarette, yet, somehow, is a breath of fresh air.

What is the strangest about artists()

A. They wear special clothes

B. They rarely work in the daytime

C. They mainly depict distressing things

D. They are liable to take illegal drugs

答案

参考答案:C

解析:

细节题。原文第一句话就说,很多事情致使人们觉得艺术家们怪诞诡异…然而最古怪的也许还是下面这个现象:他们唯一的工作就是探究各种情感,而他们所选择的探究重点却是那些令人不快的情感。这道题考查的其实就是考生对词汇lousy的理解,该词意为very painful or unpleasant“非常痛苦的或不愉快的”,因此,正确答案应该是C选项。

单项选择题

阅读下面的文字,完成文后五题。
月 台
艾 雯
是起点也是终点,是开始也是结束;是欢聚也是离散,是出发也是归宿。
从来没有一个地方,能汇集所有人的流动量,从来没有一个地方,能拥有所有的悲欢离合。从清晨到白昼,从黄昏到夜晚,从黑夜到黎明,数不清的脚印带着来自各地的泥土,重重叠叠、密密麻麻踩上去;有红色的土来自山间,有褐色的土来自田野,有黑色的土来自城市,有白色的土来自海滨。聚拢又散去,堆积又泻落,没有一粒种子能在这里生根,如同没有一双脚步会在这里驻留:缘由——
这只是流动的浮土,
这仅是过往的月台。
月台展延在任何一个城与城交接的地点.守在任何一个城镇的边缘,它只是默默地伫立,纷扰不停的是人们,为生活,为名利,为野心,为梦想……来来去去,忙忙碌碌,这是个制造离散的时代,列车频频靠站又开走,卸下一批乘客到月台,又从月台上载走了另一批。来的脚步掩盖了去的脚印,去的脚步也覆盖了来的脚印。______的脚步播撒着欢聚的喜悦,______的脚步载负着如许离愁,______的脚步踱向预定的目标,______的脚步显示心情的迫切,______的脚步缠绕于疲倦,悠闲的脚步只为一次探访,也有犹豫的脚步,属于那迷失了自己的旅客。
多少次,我也曾被卸在月台上,多少次,我也曾从月台离去,我不知道自己的脚步又显示出什么。近年来,别离总多于团聚,失望总多于获得。寂寞、惆怅和一份深沉的苍凉,常是我密切的旅伴。离去不是离去,心仍萦系于亲情;归来总不是归来,浮土又焉能扎根
人生中有无数的月台,生命旅程中有无数驿站。所有的台和站,只是供中途小憩,只是供转车再出发。别长期滞留,滞留不是宁静,将使灵魂腐蚀;别长期停顿,停顿不是安宁,将使生命萎缩。
是起点,但愿不是终点,
是开始,但愿不是结束。
是出发,归宿尚待寻求,
是离散,欢聚当可期待。
携着轻便的行李——装满信心和小小的愿望,我随时准备踏上人生的月台,只等待时间的列车来到,出发再出发!
(选自艾雯《月台》,2006《读者》)

下面是对文章内容的理解和分析,选出正确的一项是:

A.“是欢聚也是离散,是出发也是归宿”,表面看是矛盾的,实际上反映了同一事物在不同关系上的对立,引人思索。

B.作者描写“脚印”时,运用拟人修辞手法,形象地表现了月台客流量之大。

C.根据作者描写对象的不同,文章可分为两部分。第一部分描写大众月台昼夜不息地忙碌,第二部分叙写自己月台的苍凉和希望。

D.作者通过对月台的深入观察体验,由现实中的月台联系到人生中的月台,挖掘出了新的主题,意义深刻。

填空题