问题 单项选择题

Questions 21~25


Next month a large group of British business people are going to America on a venture which may generate export earnings for their companies’ shareholders in years to come. A long list of sponsors will support the initiative, which will involve a £3-million media campaign and a fortnight of events and exhibitions. The ultimate goal is to persuade more Americans that British companies have something to interest them.
While there have been plenty of trade initiatives in the past, the difference this time round is that considerable thinking and planning have gone into trying to work out just what it is that Americans look for in British products. Instead of exclusively promoting the major corporations, this time there is more emphasis on supporting the smaller, more unusual, niche businesses.
Fresh in the memories of all those concerned is the knowledge that America has been the end of many a large and apparently successful business. For Carringtons, a retail group much respected by European customers and investors, America turned out to be a commercial disaster and the belief that they could even show some of the great American stores a retailing trick or two was hopelessly over-optimistic.
Polly Brown, another very British brand that rode high for years on good profits and huge city confidence, also found that conquering America, in commercial and retailing terms, was not as easy as it had imagined. When it positioned itself in the US as a niche, luxury brand, selling shirts that were priced at $40 in the UK for $125 in the States, the strategy seemed to work. But once its management decided it should take on the middle market, this success rapidly drained away. It was a disastrous mistake and the high cost of the failed American expansion plans played a large role in its declining fortunes in the mid-nineties.
Sarah Scott, managing director of Smythson, the upmarket stationer, has had to think long and hard about what it takes to succeed in America and she takes it very seriously indeed. "Many British firms are quite patronizing about the US," she says. "They think that we’re so much more sophisticated than the Americans. They obviously haven’t noticed Ralph Lauren, an American who has been much more skilled at tapping into an idealized Englishness that any English company. Also, many companies don’t bother to study the market properly and think that because something’s successful in the UK, it’s bound to be successful over there. You have to look at what you can bring them that they haven’t already got. On the whole, American companies are brilliant at the mass, middle market and people who’ve tried to take them on at this level have found it very difficult. "
This time round it is just possible that changing tastes are running in Britain’s favour. The enthusiasm for massive, centralized retail chains has decreased. People want things with some fort of individuality; they are fed up with the banal, middle-of-the-road taste that America does so well. They are now looking for the small, the precious, the ’real thing’, and this is precisely what many of the companies participating in the initiative do best.

According to the writer, Polly Brown’s mistake occurred when it ______.

A. continued to trade despite making a loss
B. attempted to attract a different type of customer
C. tried to break into too many markets at the same time
D. expected American consumers to pay British prices

答案

参考答案:B

单项选择题 案例分析题

一般资料:求助者,女性,42岁,已婚,大学文化程度,某公司业务经理。案例介绍:求助者父母的家在郊区,自己结婚后在市内购房生活,平时与父母、哥哥、姐姐的关系很融洽。因城市改造,求助者父母的房子被拆迁了,得到了两套房子和大笔拆迁款。求助者的父母自己住一套房子,另一套给儿子,拆迁款没有分配。求助者提出建议,房子可以给哥哥,但拆迁款应该兄妹三人平分,但父母没有同意。求助者怪罪父母偏心,怪罪姐姐不和自己站在一条线上。为此与父母、哥哥、姐姐产生矛盾。求助者非常生气,内心苦恼,主动来进行心理咨询。下面是心理咨询师与该求助者的一段咨询对话。心理咨询师:你能详细地说说你生气的原因吗?求助者:我父母家拆迁了,房子给了我哥哥就算了,可拆迁款总得三人平分吧,可我父母就是不听我的,我父母偏心,一心想着儿子,我哥分到了房子,占了便宜还卖乖,说我惦记父母的财产,我姐是想要钱不想出头。多年来我为家里付出很多,孝敬父母,母亲病了我陪床近一个月。侄女上大学时周末都在我家里过,我为她找工作四处张罗。我为父母和哥哥姐姐付出很多,他们怎么能这样对我呢?我很寒心,越想越生气!为这些事我们现在关系很紧张,经常吵架。心理咨询师:我听明白了,也知道了你内心的想法,你很孝顺,过去为父母哥哥姐姐付出了很多,这次因为拆迁的事与他们产生了矛盾,这让你非常生气,是这样吗?求助者:对啊,就是这样的。心理咨询师:咱们前面商定的咨询目标是减轻你的情绪困扰,现在先看看你是怎么生气的吧。求助者:怎么生的气?当然是他们这样对我让我伤心、让我生气,如果他们听我的,按照我说的做了,我怎么会生气?心理咨询师:我听明白了,如果他们听你的,按你的要求做了,你就不生气了。按你所说,你要求别人怎样做,别人就应该怎样做。求助者:对呀,我这么做是合情合理的,他们怎么就是不听呢?心理咨询师:按你所说,你信奉的是一个人要求另一个人怎样做,另一个人就应该怎样做。求助者:对啊,应该的呀。心理咨询师:因此,别人对你怎样要求,你肯定按别人要求的去做。你丈夫让你不要唠叨,你肯定马上住嘴,你女儿要求你给钱做整容,你肯定就出钱。求助者:(沉默)……不对,那怎么成呢?我丈夫做事很粗心,当然得说啦,我女儿小小年纪,怎么能做整容呢!心理咨询师:你刚讲过一个人要求别人怎样做,别人就应该怎样做,而你实际上并没有按照你丈夫、女儿的要求去做,这似乎有些矛盾,你能解释一下吗?求助者:(沉默)……他们要求得不对,当然不应该听了。心理咨询师:你看,尽管别人对你有要求,可你实际上并没有按别人要求的去做。求助者:好像是的。心理咨询师:你提出要求,别人就应该按你所说的去做,而别人提出要求,你却可以不按别人的要求去做,同样是提出要求,却有不同的结果,这怎么解释呢?求助者:(沉默)可我说的是对的呀。心理咨询师:可你父母、哥哥也认为他们说的是对的。求助者:(沉默)我好像有些明白了,就是当人提出要求时,别人可以不按要求去做?心理咨询师:是的,你对别人提出要求,要求他们必须听你的,这是一种绝对化的要求,一种不合理的信念。不合理的信念会造成你的情绪困扰,通过改变它,你就能改变自己的情绪。例如把对别人的"要求"变成"希望",当不希望的事发生时,最多是一种失望,不会过分地怨恨别人,自己也就不会生气了。求助者:我明白了,实际上就是我提出要求,别人可以听,也可能不听,我要能接受两种可能,就不会生气了。

“因此,别人对你怎样要求……你肯定就出钱。”表明心理咨询师()。

A.启发求助者思考

B.按求助者的信念推理

C.改变求助者信念

D.实施对求助者的教育

问答题