问题 填空题

In America there are no nobles or men of letters, and the common folk mistrust the wealthy. Consequently, (1) form the highest political class, and the most cultivated circle of society. They have therefore (2) by innovation, which adds a conservative interest to their natural taste for (3) . If I were asked where I place the American aristocracy, I should reply (4) that it is not composed of the rich, who are united together by (5) , but that it occupies the judicial bench and the bar.
When I started researching this topic, I found an interesting (6) Legal Reform Now. As the name suggests, this web site is devoted to (7) , and it is definitely concerned about the dominance of lawyers in (8) . There I read an article by a (9) from the University of Wisconsin. One observation the UW article (10) is that the legal profession is the dominant profession of the people (11) to public office. For example, about half our representatives and (12) of our senators are lawyers. No other profession (13) having the same number of people in political office.
Effectively, lawyers form our nation’s (14) organized political constituency in America. Lawyers (15) and lawyers interpret our laws. When judges are appointed, the American Bar Association is the only (16) that is consulted to rate the fitness of potential judicial appointees.
Our nation has been in existence for (17) and lawyers have been this nation’s aristocracy since its (18) . Our system works, but do we really want to have a single profession (19) our nation. Specifically, do we want to have the legal profession in charge (20) , that is something to think about.

In America there are no nobles or men of letters, and the common folk mistrust the wealthy. Consequently, (1) form the highest political class, and the most cultivated circle of society. They have therefore (2) by innovation, which adds a conservative interest to their natural taste for (3) . If I were asked where I place the American aristocracy, I should reply (4) that it is not composed of the rich, who are united together by (5) , but that it occupies the judicial bench and the bar.
When I started researching this topic, I found an interesting (6) Legal Reform Now. As the name suggests, this web site is devoted to (7) , and it is definitely concerned about the dominance of lawyers in (8) . There I read an article by a (9) from the University of Wisconsin. One observation the UW article (10) is that the legal profession is the dominant profession of the people (11) to public office. For example, about half our representatives and (12) of our senators are lawyers. No other profession (13) having the same number of people in political office.
Effectively, lawyers form our nation’s (14) organized political constituency in America. Lawyers (15) and lawyers interpret our laws. When judges are appointed, the American Bar Association is the only (16) that is consulted to rate the fitness of potential judicial appointees.
Our nation has been in existence for (17) and lawyers have been this nation’s aristocracy since its (18) . Our system works, but do we really want to have a single profession (19) our nation. Specifically, do we want to have the legal profession in charge (20) , that is something to think about.

答案

参考答案:lawyers

解析: 1-20
In America there are no nobles or men of letters, and the common folk mistrust the wealthy. Consequently, lawyers form the highest political class, and the most cultivated circle of society. They have therefore nothing to gain by innovation, which adds a conservative interest to their natural taste for public order. If I were asked where I place the American aristocracy, I should reply without hesitation that it is not composed of the rich, who are united together by no common tie, but that it occupies the judicial bench and the bar.
When I started researching this topic, I found an interesting web site Legal Reform Now. As the name suggests, this web site is devoted to legal reform, and it is definitely concerned about the dominance of lawyers in American government. There I read an article by a political science professor from the University of Wisconsin. One observation the UW article confirms is that the legal profession is the dominant profession of the people we elect to public office. For example, about half our representatives and two thirds of our senators are lawyers. No other profession comes close to having the same number of people in political office
Effectively, lawyers form our nation’s most powerful organized political constituency in America. Lawyers make our laws and lawyers interpret our laws. When judges are appointed, the American Bar Association is the only professional organization that is consulted to rate the fitness of potential judicial appointees.
Our nation has been in existence for over 200 years, and lawyers have been this nation’s aristocracy since its formation. Our system works, but do we really want to have a single profession in charge of our nation. Specifically, do we want to have the legal profession in charge Next time you vote, that is something to think about.

多项选择题

2003年5月,某房地产公司欲向原告(某银行)借款2000万元,双方约定房地产公司以购置的一块位于市中心由其享有使用权的土地,以及今后在该土地上建造的建筑物作为抵押。双方订立抵押合同后,在有关部门作了登记。原告在仔细了解了该土地的价值及投资情况以后,仍不放心,遂要求房地产公司还必须找第三人担保。房地产公司便商请被告(某投资公司)作保,而投资公司也同意作保。同年6月1日,房地产公司与原告签订了借款合同,张某代表投资公司在保证人一栏中写下了“愿与房地产公司负连带责任”的条款,并签字盖章。房地产公司在获得借款以后,将资金挪作他用,因而在规定的还款期(第二年的6月1日)届至时不能还款。原告发现该土地上房地产公司设定了另一个未登记的抵押后,为避免抵押权实现受阻,遂直接请求投资公司偿还房地产公司的欠款并支付迟延利息。投资公司不同意,引发诉讼。人民法院将起诉状送达被告,在超过答辩期、举证期限届满的前一天,被告向人民法院提出调查收集证据的申请。

对被告请求调查收集证据的申请,人民法院______。

A.应当准许

B.可以准许也可以不准许

C.应当制作判决书予以驳回

D.可以不同意,因为被告的申请违反举证时限的要求

E.应当驳回,因为被告没有权利要求法院调查收集证据

单项选择题