问题 单项选择题

Surprisingly enough, modern historians have rarely interested themselves in the history of the American South in the period before the South began to become self-consciously and distinctively " Southern"—the decades after 1815. Consequently, the cultural history of Britain’s North American empire in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries has been written almost as if the Southern colonies had never existed. The American culture that emerged during the Colonial and Revolutionary eras has been depicted as having been simply an extension of New England Puritan culture.

However, Professor Davis has recently argued that the South stood apart from the rest of American society during this early period, following its own unique pattern of cultural development. The case for Southern distinctiveness rests_ upon two related premises: first, that the cultural similarities among the five Southern colonies were far more impressive than the differences, and second, that what made those colonies alike also made them different from the other colonies. The first, for which Davis offers an enormous amount of evidence, can be accepted without major recitations, the second is far more problematic.

What makes the second premise problematic is the use of the Puritan colonies as a basis for comparison. Quite properly,Davis decries the excessive influence ascribed by historians to the Puritans in the formation of American culture. Yet Davis inadvertently adds weight to such ascriptions by using the Puritans as the standard against which to assess the achievements and contributions of Southern colonials. Throughout, Davis focuses on the important and undeniable differences between the Southern and Puritan colonies in motives for and patterns of early settlement, in attitudes toward nature and Native Americans, and in the degree of receptivity to metropolitan cultural influences.

However, recent scholarship has ply suggested that those aspects of early New England culture that seem to have been most distinctly Puritan, such as the p religious orientation and the communal impulse, were not even typical of New England as a whole, but were largely confined to the two colonies of Massachusetts and Connecticut. Thus, what in contrast to the Puritan colonies appears to Davis to be peculiarly Southern-acquisitiveness. A p interest in polities and the law, and a tendency to cultivate metropolitan cultural models were not only more typically English than the cultural patterns exhibited by Puritan Massachusetts and Connecticut, but also almost certainly characteristic of most other early modern British colonies from Barbados north to Rhode Island and New Hampshire. Within the larger framework of American colonial life, then, not the Southern but the Puritan colonies appear to have been distinctive, and even they seem to have been rapidly assimilating to the dominant cultural patterns by the last Colonial period.

The word "premises" (Pard. 2) most probably means()

A. presupposition

B. prestigious

C. prevalent

D. prejudice

答案

参考答案:A

解析:

第二段第一句说南方发展了自己独特的文化模式,这种独特性是建立在两个相关的premises之上,premises此处应指“前提、基础、假设”之类的含义。B选项意为“有名望的”;C选项意为“流行的,普遍的”;D选项意为“偏见”。故正确选项为A。

选择题
问答题 案例分析题

阅读下列材料,回答问题:

材料一(智者学派中的)另一些人则把自然与法律对立起来,强调自然(注:这里指“人的本性”)是不可抗拒的……因此,他们要求废弃约束违反自然的法律、习俗和伦理,建立起与自然相符的法律和习俗。普罗泰戈拉特别强调人的尊严和价值是至高无上的,国家治理好坏的标准,要看它是否对人有利和符合人性。

材料二苏格拉底提出一个重要的命题即“美德即知识”(或“道德即知识”)。其涵义是,他认为一切美德都离不开知识,知识是美德的基础,知识贯穿于一切美德之中;美德不是孤立存在的一些观念和准则,任何美德都须具备相应的知识,无知的人不会真正有美德。……正义也是美德,而这种美德的基础是能处理人与人之间的关系,处理他人与我之间关系的知识。勇敢也是美德,而理性的知识贯穿于勇敢之中,没有理性的知识,勇敢是无益的。节制也是美德,而节制离不开克制欲望、了解需求,严于律己的知识。

材料三康德认为法律作为社会生活中的“普遍必然”使个人行为与普遍道德法则协调一致。所以,法律是个人自由与他人自由共存的条件和制度。法律与道德的不同在于:道德是内在的、自觉的,它推动人们应该这样行动;法律是外在的、强制的、它限制人们去做某事。法律的完善是社会进步的标志。康德希望建立一个在法律之下的个人与他人具有同样自由的统一的政治制度。然而,这个理想制度不是通过直接的政治实践,而是通过道德的不断完善来实现。

综合上述材料,谈谈你对个人自由的认识。