问题 单项选择题

It is clear that some chemicals can damage the health of animals and humans. (1) , this is not the only problem that (2) be caused by the careless use of chemicals. Chemicals can also (3) the ecological balance of the environment. If the ecological balance is disturbed, the results can be (4) serious.

The (5) of DDT illustrates the problem. DDT, a chemical which kills insects, at first seemed to be a perfect answer (6) many problems. It would control insects that caused dangerous diseases, (7) insects that caused billions of dollars of damage to crops every year. Governments permitted and even (8) the use of DDT. Farmers in many countries (9) to spray it on their crops. The (10) results were good: Damage to crops (11) down, and profits went up. However, the chemical had effects which the scientists didn’t see in (12) . First, it also killed insects which were the (13) enemies of the harmful insects and which were therefore beneficial to farmers. Second, and perhaps worse, DDT did not kill (14) harmful insect. A few insects had natural resistance to the chemical. They (15) and reproduced in large numbers. In a few years there were large numbers of insects which were not (16) by DDT, and there were (17) insects which could act as natural (18) on these new "super-insects". Finally, it became clear that DDT was not solving the insect problem. In fact, it was making the problem worse. It (19) became necessary to find a second (20) for the effects of the first.

16()

A.effected 

B.affected 

C.damaged 

D.killed

答案

参考答案:B

单项选择题
问答题 案例分析题

2004年1月,某高校教师陈某与甲出版社签订出版合同。合同约定的内容中有陈某将其作品《探险历程》的专有使用权授予甲出版社,使用方式是以图书、报纸、期刊等纸质出版物形式登载作品的部分或全部内容。甲出版社承诺在收到作品稿件的6个月内先出版图书,其他权利保留到以后行使。甲出版社出版图书应向陈某支付版税;版税按图书定价和实际销售数结算,销售数在5000册以下(含5000册)时版税率为7%,超过5000册部分的版税率为8%;图书出版后先按3000册预付版税,以后每年年底按实际销售数结算版税。

2004年3月,乙期刊社从甲出版社的《新书预告》中了解到《探险历程》即将出版,于是找到陈某,希望在其所办期刊《耳闻目见》上发表书评来介绍该书。陈某表示同意。在将书稿电子文本交给乙期刊社时,陈某强调说明该稿内容只能用于撰写书评时作参考,不可作他用。2004年5月中旬,乙期刊社在《耳闻目见》上刊登了一篇名为《(探险历程)述评》的文章,全文长达数万字,除在开头加了200字左右的“按语”介绍作者身份和该书创作背景外,其余全部是《探险历程》的基本内容,仅稍作删节。同月下旬,甲出版社的《探险历程》一书出版。该书定价15元,首次印刷6000册,发往各地书店寄销。2004年10月重印5000册,陆续给书店添货。

甲出版社2004年从书店获得4000册《探险历程》的销售款,2005年获得5500册书的销售款。但是,按合同约定向陈某预付版税后,甲出版社由于获知期刊《耳闻目见》登载《(探险历程)述评》一文是由于陈某把书稿又交给了乙期刊社,便不再支付版税。陈某于2006年2月要求甲出版社支付版税,甲出版社以陈某已违约为由而不同意支付。陈某承认曾将书稿电子文本交给乙期刊社,但说当时已经强调说明“只能用于撰写书评时作参考,不可作他用”,是乙期刊社擅自违约登载。甲出版社经过核实后,认为责任在乙期刊社,陈某没有违约,因此向陈某道歉,并愿意立即补付版税,同时希望陈某与甲出版社一起起诉乙期刊社。陈某表示理解甲出版社的做法,并同意共同起诉乙期刊社。

在法庭上,乙期刊社对陈某陈述的事实没有提出异议,但辩称《耳闻目见》刊登书评是事先经作者同意的,且文章已说明《探险历程》的作者为陈某,这种行为是合理使用,不构成侵权。

法院审理后认为:乙期刊社的抗辩理由不能成立,其行为侵犯了陈某和甲出版社的权利。

为什么说乙期刊社侵犯了陈某的权利?