问题 单项选择题

As a professor at a large American university, there is a phrase that I hear often from students: "I’m only a 1050. "The unlucky students are speaking of the score on the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT), which is used to determine whether they will be admitted to the college or university of their choice, or even have a chance to get a higher education at all. The SAT score, whether it is 800, 1100 or 1550, has become the focus at this time of their life.

It is obvious that if students value highly their test scores, then a great amount of their serf-respect is put in the number. Students who perform poorly on the exam are left feeling that it is all over. The low test score, they think, will make it impossible for them to get into a good college. And without a degree from a prestigious university, they fear that many of life’s doors will remain forever closed.

According to a study done in the 1990s, the SAT is only a reliable indicator of a student’s future performance in most cases. Interestingly, it becomes much more accurate when it is set together with other indicators—like a student’s high school grades. Even if standardized tests like the SAT can show a student’s academic proficiency, they will never be able to test things like confidence, efforts and willpower, and are unable to give us the full picture of a student’s potentialities (潜力). This is not to suggest that we should stop using SAT scores in our college admission process. The SAT is an excellent test in many ways, and the score is still a useful means of testing students. However, it should be only one of many methods used.

This passage is mainly about ().

A.how to prepare for the SAT

B.the stress caused by the SAT

C.American higher education

D.the SAT and its effects

答案

参考答案:D

解析:

[专家点评] 这篇短文讲述了SAT测试及其对学生造成的影响,故D正确。

选择题
问答题 案例分析题

某工程,建设单位与甲施工单位按照《建设工程施工合同(示范文本)》签订了施工合同。经建设单位同意,甲施工单位选择了乙施工单位作为分包单位。在合同履行中,发生了如下事件。事件1:在合同约定的工程开工日前,建设单位收到甲施工单位报送的工程开工报审表后即予处理。建设单位考虑到施工许可证已获政府主管部门批准且甲施工单位的施工机具和施工人贵已经进场,便审核签认了工程开工报审表并通知了项目监理机构。事件2:在施工过程中,甲施工单位的资金出现困难,无法按分包合同约定支付乙施工单位工程款。乙施工单位向项目监理机构提出了支付申请。项目监理机构受理并征得建设单位同意后,即向乙施工单位签发了付款凭证。事件3:专业监理工程师在巡视中发现,乙施工单位施工的某部位存在质量隐患,专业监理工程师随即向甲施工单位签发了整改通知。甲施工单位回函称,建设单位已直接向乙施工单位付款,因而本单位对乙施工单位施工的工程质量不承担责任。事件4:甲施工单位向建设单位提交工程竣工验收报告后,建设单位于2012年9月20日组织勘察、设计、施工、监理等单位进行竣工验收,工程竣工验收通过,各单位分别签署了质量合格文件。建设单位于2012年3月办理了工程竣工备案。因使用需要,建设单位于2012年10月初要求乙施工单位按其示意图在已验收合格的承重墙上开车库门洞,并于2012年10月底正式将该工程投入使用。2014年2月该工程给水排水管道大量漏水,经监理单位组织检查,确认是因开车库门洞施工时破坏了承重结构所致。建设单位认为工程还在保修期,要求甲施工单位无偿修理。建设行政主管部门对责任单位进行了处罚。

根据《建设工程质量管理条例》(国务院令第279号),事件4中建设行政主管部门是否应对建设单位、监理单位、甲施工单位、乙施工单位进行处罚?说明理由。