问题 问答题

个体运输司机苏某在驾驶货车从市里返回县城的途中,欲超过前边同方向行驶的一辆货车,经多次用大灯变光示意,前车故意不让道,还故意阻挡后车,占道行驶10余里。当行至某公路饭店时,前车停下,苏某遂停车并找到前车司机孟某理论,孟某解释说他以为要超车的是一同拉煤的车,出于开玩笑取乐,才没有给其让路。苏某听完解释后非常生气,遂大声咒骂,并动手击打孟某。孟某也操起一根铁棍进行还击,孟某的几个同伙也赶过来帮忙。由于人少力单,苏某被打伤(后来经过法医鉴定,脾脏受损,构成轻伤)。殴斗停止后,车继续前行,苏某在车上通知了家人,其妻子、兄弟等五六人在某检查站路口处,将孟某的车堵住,孟某见此情形将车门关闭,弃车而逃。苏某便用铁锹砸碎两侧车门玻璃,将车开到县城一家加工厂院内扣留。当天孟某向公安机关报案,公安机关要求苏某把车退给车主孟某,苏某强调自己被打伤,向孟某索要医药费,拒不退车,并卸掉两个轮胎。
问:苏某行为是否构成犯罪如果构成犯罪,罪名是什么为什么

答案

参考答案:苏某的行为不构成犯罪。
首先,本案中,苏某伙同他人,借助优势地位,使孟某产生恐惧心理弃车逃跑,进而砸坏车窗,强行开走孟某的汽车,其在客观上确有采用强制手段非法获得他人财产的行为,但在主观上,苏某并无以暴力、胁迫等强制手段非法占有他人财产的目的,其主观心理主要是以此手段向孟某索要其应当偿付的医药费。因此,苏某的行为不符合抢劫罪的构成要件,不能以抢劫罪定罪处罚。
其次,在本案中,苏某强行扣车的行为事出有因。苏某是在被孟某打成轻伤后意图报复和索要赔偿的双重心理支配下,才召集有关人故意拦截孟某的车辆,但因为孟某弃车逃离,其报复目的自然无法实现,因此,其扣车的行为主要目的就在于向孟某索取医药费。因而,苏某的行为不属于基于炫耀武力、无事生非心理的强拿硬要行为,因此亦不构成寻衅滋事罪。对该案中的医疗费及汽车损失应按民事纠纷处理。

阅读理解

阅读理解。

     Few laws are so effective that you can see results just days after they take effect. But in the nine days

since the federal cigarette tax more than doubled-to $1. 01 per pack-smokers have jammed telephone "quit

lines" across the country seeking to kick the habit.

     This is not a surprise to public health advocates. They've studied the effect of state tax increases for

years, finding that smokers, especially teens, are price sensitive. Nor is it a shock to the industry, which

fiercely fights every tax increase.

     The only wonder is that so many states insist on closing their ears to the message. Tobacco taxes improve

public health, health, they raise money and most particularly, they deter people from taking up the habit as

teens, which is when nearly all smokers are addicted. Yet the rate of taxation varies widely.

     In Manhattan, for instance, which has the highest tax in the nation, a pack of Marlboro Light Kings cost

$10.06 at one drugstore Wednesday. Charleston, S, C., where the 7-cent-a-pack tax is the lowest in the

nation. The price was $ 4.78.

     The influence is obvious.

     In New York, high school smoking hit a new low in the latest surveys-13.8%, far below the national

average. By comparison, 26% of high school students smoke in Kentucky, Other low-tax states have similarly

depressing teen-smoking records.

     Hal Rogers, Representative from Kentucky, like those who are against high tobacco taxes, argues that

the burden of the tax falls on low-income Americans "who choose to smoke."

     That's true, But there is more reason in keeping future generations of low-income workers from getting

hooked in the first place, As for today's adults, if the new tax drives them to quit, they will have more to

spend on their families, cut their risk of cancer and heart disease and feel better.

1. The text is mainly about _____.

A. the price of cigarettes

B. tie rate of teen smoking

C. the effect of tobacco tax increase

D. the differences in tobacco tax rate

2. What does the author think is a surprise?

A. Teen smokers are price sensitive.

B. Some states still keep the tobacco tax low.

C. Tobacco taxes improve public health.

D. Tobacco industry fiercely fights the tax rise.

3. The underlined word "deter" in Paragraph 3 most probably means _____.

A. discourage

B. remove

C. benefit

D. free

4. Rogers' attitude towards the low-income smokers might be that of _____.

A. tolerance

B. unconcern

C. doubt

D. concern

单项选择题