案情：甲和乙是某市长生宝饮料股份有限公司的董事。2008年2月，甲、乙二人又和丙合资开办保长生饮料有限责任公司，生产“保长生”牌饮料，与长生宝公司的产品饮料口味、选料、技术基本相同。同年3月，长生宝公司发现了甲、乙另办保长生饮料有限责任公司的行为，经过董事会研究决定罢免了甲、乙的董事职务，并要求甲、乙将其经营保长生饮料有限责任公司所得收入100万元交回公司。甲、乙不同意，辨称：我们两公司的饮料的品牌不同，互不相干，我们的额外劳动所得不应当交回公司。于是，董事会研究决定，以公司名义向法院起诉。
问题：
| 甲、乙的主张有无法律依据 |
参考答案：
解析：甲、乙的主张没有法律依据。因为二者所任董事的公司与其合资开办的公司的营业属于同类营业，违反了《公司法》有关“董事、高级管理人员未经股东会或者股东大会同意，不得自营或者为他人经营与所任职公司同类的业务”的规定，其法律后果之一是其收入应当归公司所有。
| 完形填空。 |
| It took Charlie several months to save up (积蓄) seven dollars. He wanted to 1 a model plane and went to the shop with the money. On the way, Charlie saw a little boy 2 on a corner of the street. 3 are you crying? Charlie asked. Those big boys took 4 my four dollars just now, the boy said, I was on 5 way to buy some exercise-books, but now I can't. Charlie thought of the 6 dollars in the pocket. He though of the model plane and the poor 7 . Charlie wanted to walk away, 8 he did not. At last he 9 four dollars to the boy and went home. Charlie 10 happy. Do you know why? He was happy because the little boy was happy. |
| ( )1．A．sell ( )2．A．cry ( )3．A．Why ( )4．A．out ( )5．A．my ( )6．A．there ( )7．A．some exercise-books C．three big boys ( )8．A．and ( )9．A．lent ( )10．A．becomes | B．buy B．to cry B．How B．off B．their B．seven B．though B．gave B．seemed | C．hold C．crying C．The reason C．up C．his C．four B．seven dollars D．littte boy C．but C．borrowed C．feels | D．bring D．cried D．for D．away D．a D．little D．so D．took D．felt |