2003年5月，济南某化工厂(以下简称济南厂)与南京某化学制品公司(以下简称南京公司)在无锡签订了一份化工原料买卖合同，双方约定在2003年7月至12月之间由济南厂用罐装车分三批向南京公司发运化工原料共30吨，货到付款。同年7月，济南厂向南京公司发运原料首批10吨，并在货到后第三天收到该批货款30万元。8月初，市场上该化工厂原料价格上扬，济南厂便不再发货。南京公司因缺乏生产原料，几近停产。几经催促未果，无奈南京公司只得向上海某化工厂以高于市场价5%的价格购买此种化工原料20吨。同年9月底，由于生产厂家太多，此种化工原料价格下跌，济南厂马上一次性发货 20吨，并在装车待运前通知南京公司接货。南京公司立即通知济南厂，要求不要发货并解除双方签订的买卖合同。济南厂不同意，理由是合同中并无履约的具体期限，于是强行发货。货到南京后，因无处贮存，南京公司只得将此批化工原料转让给武汉某化学品公司，谁知承运此批货物的南京某运输公司的货轮在安庆江面撞上重庆轮船公司正常行使的客轮，货轮上部分化工原料泄露到江面，济南厂向南京公司催要货款，双方产生争议。

如果南京公司与南京某运输公司订有运输合同，现双方就此合同产生了争议，对此争议有权管辖的法院是()。

A．南京市有关人民法院

B．武汉市有关人民法院

C．安庆市有关人民法院

D．济南市有关人民法院

My family and I lived across the street from Southway Park since I was four years old. Then just last year the city put a chain link fence around the park and started bulldozing (用推土机推平) the trees and grass to make way for a new apartment complex. When I saw the fence and bulldozers, I asked myself, “Why don't they just leave it alone?”       

Looking back, I think what sentenced the park to oblivion (被遗忘) was the drought (旱灾) we had about four years ago. Up until then, Southway Park was a nice green park with plenty of trees and a public swimming pool. My friends and I rollerskated on the sidewalks, climbed the trees, and swam in the pool all the years I was growing up. The park was almost like my own yard. Then the summer I was fifteen the drought came and things changed.

There had been almost no rain at all that year. The city stopped watering the park grass. Within a few weeks I found myself living across the street from a huge brown desert. Leaves fell off the park trees, and pretty soon the trees started dying, too. Next, the park swimming pool was closed. The city cut down on the work force that kept the park, and pretty soon it just got too ugly and dirty to enjoy anymore.

As the drought lasted into the fall, the park got worse every month. The rubbish piled up or blew across the brown grass. Soon the only people in the park were beggars and other people down on their luck. People said drugs were being sold or traded there now. The park had gotten scary, and my mother told us kids not to go there anymore.      

The drought finally ended and things seemed to get back to normal, that is, everything but the park. It had gotten into such bad shape that the city just let it stay that way. Then about six months ago I heard that the city was going to “redevelop” certain worn-out areas of the city. It turned out that the city had planned to get rid of the park, sell the land and let someone build rows of apartment buildings on it.

The chain-link fencing and the bulldozers did their work.  Now we live across the street from six rows of apartment buildings. Each of them is three units high and stretches a block in each direction. The neighborhood has changed without the park. The streets I used to play in are jammed with cars now. Things will never be the same again. Sometimes I wonder, though, what changes another drought would make in the way things are today.

1. How did the writer feel when he saw the fence and bulldozers.'?

A．Scared.             B. Confused.        C. Upset.       D. Curious.

2. Why was the writer told not to go to the park by his mother?

A．It was being rebuilt.                         B. It was dangerous.

C. It became crowded.                            D. It had turned into a desert.

3. According to the writer, what eventually brought about the disappearance of the park?

A. The drought.                                   B. The crime.

C. The beggars and the rubbish.                   D. The decisions of the city.

4. The last sentence of the passage implies that if another drought came,         .

A. the situation would be much worse

B. people would have to desert their homes

C. the city would be fully prepared in advance

D. the city would have to redevelop the neighborhood