问题 综合题

材料一:王安石上书:“理财以农事为急,农以去其疾苦,抑兼并,便趣农为急,此臣所以汲汲于差役之法也”。“免役之法,据家赀高下,各令出钱雇人充役,下至单丁、女户,本来无役者,亦一概输钱,谓之助役钱。”         ——摘引自《临川先生文集》

 

材料二:他们中间的大多数和最坚强的人,却开始团结起来,互相激励,不要在这些富人面前屈服,要选出一个可靠的人作为他们的领袖……在这个时候雅典人把目光都盯在梭伦身上。他们认为,他是唯一和当时罪恶最无涉的人物;他既未曾插手于富人们的不义,也没有连累在穷人们困苦之中。因此,他们请他挺身而出,结束当前的纷争

——摘自《希腊罗马名人传·梭伦传》

(1)材料一中,王安石提出“免役之法”的目的是什么?(2分)结合材料和所学知识分析该项法令产生的影响。(3分)

(2)梭伦与王安石面对的社会问题有何相似性?(2分)他们解决问题的思想方法有何不同?(4分)由此产生了怎样的不同效果?(4分)

答案

(1)目的:增加政府收入,缓和阶级矛盾。(2分)

影响:有利于缓解政府的财政危机、统治危机,有利于农业生产的发展,(2分)但原本无需承担差役的对象也要缴交助役钱则产生了新的矛盾。(1分)

(2)相似性:阶级矛盾尖锐(或统治危机严重)。(2分)

不同之处:王安石以“理财”为中心,偏重于谋求开辟财源以获取更多的财政税收;(2分)梭伦奉行“不偏不倚”思想,试图通过法律途径超越贵族和平民的狭隘集团私利,来化解社会矛盾。(2分)

效果:王安石变法遭到守旧官僚的群起反对,后来新法相继被废除;梭伦改革无法满足贵族和平民的两方面利益,但却奠定了雅典民主政治的基础。(4分)

默写题
单项选择题

Questions 16 to 20 are based on the following talk.

Today we are going to talk about cross-cultural perceptions of time. Different cultures often have entirely different perceptions of time. The cultural anthropologist Edward T. Hall popularized the idea that cultures use time and view time in very different ways. The idea of the past, present, and future-- and the whole concept of scheduling or managing time--can be so different that it leads to cross-cultural miscommunications. In his 1990 book The Dance of Life, Hall writes, "Time is one of the fundamental bases on which all cultures rest and around which all activities revolve. Understanding the difference between mono-chronic time and poty-chronic time is essential to success. "

Hall’s notion of monochronism and polychronism can be understood as follows. Mono-chronic time is linear. Events are scheduled one at a time, one event following another. To a monochronic culture, this type of schedule is valued over interpersonal relationships. On the other hand, poly-chronic time is characterized by many things happening simultaneously. In addition, interpersonal relationships are highly valued in polychronic cultures.

Hall’s theory is that monochronic time can be found primarily in North American and Northern European cultures. These cultures emphasize schedules, punctuality, and preciseness. They also emphasize "doing" things. They are cultures that value productivity, that value getting things done "on time. " They view time as something that can be lost, kiiled, or wasted--or, conversely, they view time as something that can, or should, be managed, planned, and used efficiently.

Polychronic time, on the other hand, can be found primarily in Latin American, African, and Native American cultures. Their perception of time is more connected to natural rhythms. It is connected to the earth, to the seasons. This makes sense when we consider that natural events can occur spontaneously, sporadically, or concurrently. Polychronic cultures view time as being somewhat flexible. Since life isn’t so predictable scheduling and being precise simply isn’t that important. In addition, relationships with people are valued more than making schedules. There is more value placed on "being" than on "doing. "

Different cultural perceptions of time can lead to conflict, especially in the business world The idea of being late versus on time for a meeting, for example, might differ widely between an American businessperson and a Brazilian; the American businessperson might be far less tolerant of a Brazilian’ s late arrival. However, the Brazilian businessperson might be offended by an American’s insistence on punctuality, or on getting right down to business; the Brazilian would generally prefer to finish talking with colleagues first, and would not want to cut a conversation short in order to make an appointment.

Some traditional time management programs used in the business world might not translate well in another culture. Traditional time management programs in the business world emphasize to-do lists and careful scheduling. They are monochronic. However, a business in a polychronic culture might not adjust well to that system. Companies who impose these mono-chronic systems on places of business in polychronic cultures might be guilty of ethnocentrism, which means making their own ethnic or cultural values central and not valuing other values.

Edward Hall’s theory of monochronic and polychronic cultures has been challenged by some critics. Some people think it is overly general. They argue that within any cultural group we might find people who think of time differently. In other words, a primarily polychronic culture might have both monochronic and polychronic types of people. The same diversity among individuals might be found in a primarily monochronic culture. Critics of anthropologists like Edward Hall feel that it’s more useful to think of time differences among individuals, not just between cultural groups.

Question No. 16 Which of the following topics is the person talking about

16().

A. Different perceptions of time across cultures.

B. Cross-cultural miscommunications.

C. The idea of the past, present and future time

D. A fundamental basis for business conversations.