问题 问答题

某城市拟对市中心区域进行旧城改造,涉及A、B、C、D四宗地,土地总面积为20000m2。其中宗地A为一旧住宅区,土地总面积为8500m2;宗地B为企业甲所使用的国有划拨土地,土地面积为7000m2,土地现状用途为工业,由于规划限制,该企业计划搬迁到城市郊区;宗地C为公司乙所使用的国有出让土地,土地面积为1500m2,出让用途为商业,出让年期为40年,已使用5年;宗地D为公司丙所使用的国有出让土地,土地面积为3000m2,出让用途为商业性办公用地,出让年期为40年,由于缺乏建设资金,该宗地已闲置5年。
上述四宗地由当地市土地收购储备中心代表政府进行统一收购,经整理后按照规划拟建成一商业中心,规划建筑容积率为2.0~3.5。
请根据以上情况,回答下列问题

根据国家有关规定,市土地收购储备中心在收购宗地C时,应对公司乙的土地使用权进行补偿,请问:如何确定补偿价格

答案

参考答案:对宗地C应按原出让用途及其年限下的市场价格给予适当补偿。
(1)土地用途应设定为商业。
土地使用权年限应为出让剩余年限35年。
(2)可选择采用收益还原法、基准地价系数修正法、市场比较法、剩余法等方法。

单项选择题
单项选择题

A rare provision in San Francisco’s business tax code that taxes companies when employees cash in their stock options has caused a stir in this hotbed of fledgling tech companies. Remarkably, few companies even knew about the tax, which has been in effect for seven years. But since city officials offered Twitter a payroll-tax break as an incentive for it to remain in San Francisco (the company is considered likely to go public soon), the stock-option provision has suddenly come under intense scrutiny. A number of other booming companies, including Zings, the maker of online games and one of the city’s fastest-growing firms, have threatened to leave the city unless they receive similar payroll-tax exemptions before going public.

Unlike most cities, San Francisco generates most of its business tax revenue through a payroll tax. The Twitter exemption bill, which will be considered by the full Board of Supervisors on April 5, would freeze payroll taxes for six years along a strip of Market Street—where Twitter is set to relocate—and several square blocks in the Tenderloin neighborhood. Twitter executives had been concerned because since 2004 the city’s payroll tax code has counted stock options granted to employees as compensation, which is taxed at 1.5 percent. If Twitter goes public in San Francisco and a large number of workers exercise their options, the city would tax the company on its employees’ stock gains—a bill likely to amount to tens of millions of dollars. "Twitter could be looking at a significantly larger payroll tax liability if and when it goes public," said Ted Egan, the chief economist in San Francisco’s controller’s office.

Because of the dearth of I. P. O. ’s inside the city limits in the last decade, the stockoption tax has gone under radar until now. Businesses, city officials and even seasoned tax lawyers are confounded. "Nobody ever talked about this because nobody’s really tested these issues before," said Thomas H. Steele, a partner in Morrison & Foerster’s San Francisco office, specializing in state and local tax. He said that his clients began calling him this week to ask about the tax’s ramifications. "A Pandora’s box has already been opened," said Supervisor Ross Mirkarimi, a member of the Board of Supervisors’ budget and finance committee, who has expressed concern about tailoring legislation for one company. "We’ve been going about this the wrong way," he said. The recent confusion has added impetus to calls for comprehensive business tax reform by David Chiu, the board president. "The stock option problem is real," Mr. Chiu said. "We have to address it in a fair and responsible way.

About the board president ,which is the correct()

A. His reformatory intent would be more supportive

B. He thinks that it is unfair of the present tax-free system

C. He has the same opinions as Ross Mirkarimi does

D. He thinks present system is confusing