问题 单项选择题

Randy Kraus was paralyzed. His left side was useless. But his right hand was (1) enough to lift a bucket to his forehead. Once, he’d been a police officer and owned a private-eye agency. Once, he’d been p and able. Now, he felt he was nothing.
His (2) started with Parkinson’s disease, but it didn’t (3) there. In July 2002, the 60 year old Kraus went into the hospital for an operation to control the shaking. (4) , during the operation, he had a stroke. He was paralyzed. The (5) man, who loved golf, could think, but couldn’t (6) . Kraus wanted the doctors to (7) it to him straight. "You may never walk again, " they told him. "Maybe you won’t (8) be able to talk. "
Once at home, he (9) he couldn’t lift a fork or take a drink by himself. Physical treatment was so painful and slow. What did he have to (10) for So now Kraus held the gun against his head. (11) the cold metal on his skin, he began to consider not his pain, but the pain he (12) cause his wife, daughters and grandchildren. He didn’t pull the trigger.
"You are where you are", his exercise physiologist, Andrew Garud told him. "The pace would be slow; the pain would be (13) . But as long as you are (14) , you have the ability to get better. " After three months of (15) with Garud, Kraus wanted to see if he could (16) . He could. Then he took three steps, sat down and cried like a baby. One step (17) to another. Next he managed a short walk. It was the hardest (18) of Kraus’s life.
Garud kept saying he could (19) more. Now, Kraus can brush his teeth, shave himself and get around the house with a walker. Little success only the paralyzed can (20) understand.

A.should
B.must
C.would
D.need

答案

参考答案:C

解析: 文意:他考虑的不再是他的伤痛,而是他的死亡会给亲人带来的痛苦。他死后将会带来痛苦,但他还没死。此处应该用过去将来时。故选C。

单项选择题
问答题

甲企业是一家有限合伙企业,由吴某、李某和赵某设立。其中吴某为普通合伙人,李某和赵某为有限合伙人。2011年2月,甲企业接到乙公司发出一封电子邮件称:现有一批电器,包括某型号电视机180台,每台售价4500元;某型号电冰箱80台,每台售价2900元。如有意购买,请告知。甲企业回复称:只欲购买乙公司70台电视机,每台电视机付款4100元;40台电冰箱,每台电冰箱付款2600元。乙公司表示同意甲企业的要求。
由于吴某家中有事,李某自行前往乙公司签订买卖合同。签订合同时,李某发现乙公司还有一批微波炉物美价廉,即在合同中增加购买微波炉40台。双方约定交货地为甲企业,货到付款,另外还约定如双方发生纠纷,选择乙公司所在地的仲裁机构仲裁解决。
2011年5月,乙公司将电视机和电冰箱运至甲企业,并告诉甲企业,微波炉已改为由丙公刮供货,价格不变,甲企业当即表示不同意。丙公司依然将微波炉送至甲企业,甲企业发现丙公司提供的微波炉质量不合格,拒绝接受,双方发生纠纷。
由于购买微波炉给甲企业造成了一定损失,吴某不愿承担无限责任。吴某向李某和赵某提出要求:如果甲企业继续经营,自己也转变为有限合伙人,并且对企业设立以来的债务承担有限责任。对此,李某和赵某均不同意。
2011年6月,甲企业向当地人民法院提起诉讼。甲企业主张:乙公司将微波炉改为由丙公司供货未经本企业同意,要求乙公司赔偿损失。
要求:根据以上事实并结合法律规定,分别回答下列问题:

乙公司向甲企业发出的电子邮件是要约还是要约邀请甲企业的回复是承诺还是新的要约说明理由。