问题 问答题

认真阅读“给定资料”,简要回答下面两题。

“给定资料4”中提到:“网民对禁止‘公开个人信息’的最大质疑,是担心其成为阻止涉及公共利益公开的借口。”请就这句话谈谈你的理解。
要求:简明扼要,言之成理。不超过150字。

答案

参考答案:“人肉搜索” * * 效应的存在,是因为公共权力监督渠道的丧失。公共领域的信息公开近年虽有一定进展,但在涉及官员个人的财产申报制度等方面,一直未能有效建立起来。公众要获知公职人员的真实信息,履行公众监督之责,依然存在困难。只有建立起相关机制,拔去贪官得以隐匿的保护伞,“人肉搜索”的 * * 功能才可能被公众弃用,转而进行更为规范、有效的权力监督。

单项选择题 A1型题
填空题

In America there are no nobles or men of letters, and the common folk mistrust the wealthy. Consequently, (1) form the highest political class, and the most cultivated circle of society. They have therefore (2) by innovation, which adds a conservative interest to their natural taste for (3) . If I were asked where I place the American aristocracy, I should reply (4) that it is not composed of the rich, who are united together by (5) , but that it occupies the judicial bench and the bar.
When I started researching this topic, I found an interesting (6) Legal Reform Now. As the name suggests, this web site is devoted to (7) , and it is definitely concerned about the dominance of lawyers in (8) . There I read an article by a (9) from the University of Wisconsin. One observation the UW article (10) is that the legal profession is the dominant profession of the people (11) to public office. For example, about half our representatives and (12) of our senators are lawyers. No other profession (13) having the same number of people in political office.
Effectively, lawyers form our nation’s (14) organized political constituency in America. Lawyers (15) and lawyers interpret our laws. When judges are appointed, the American Bar Association is the only (16) that is consulted to rate the fitness of potential judicial appointees.
Our nation has been in existence for (17) and lawyers have been this nation’s aristocracy since its (18) . Our system works, but do we really want to have a single profession (19) our nation. Specifically, do we want to have the legal profession in charge (20) , that is something to think about.

In America there are no nobles or men of letters, and the common folk mistrust the wealthy. Consequently, (1) form the highest political class, and the most cultivated circle of society. They have therefore (2) by innovation, which adds a conservative interest to their natural taste for (3) . If I were asked where I place the American aristocracy, I should reply (4) that it is not composed of the rich, who are united together by (5) , but that it occupies the judicial bench and the bar.
When I started researching this topic, I found an interesting (6) Legal Reform Now. As the name suggests, this web site is devoted to (7) , and it is definitely concerned about the dominance of lawyers in (8) . There I read an article by a (9) from the University of Wisconsin. One observation the UW article (10) is that the legal profession is the dominant profession of the people (11) to public office. For example, about half our representatives and (12) of our senators are lawyers. No other profession (13) having the same number of people in political office.
Effectively, lawyers form our nation’s (14) organized political constituency in America. Lawyers (15) and lawyers interpret our laws. When judges are appointed, the American Bar Association is the only (16) that is consulted to rate the fitness of potential judicial appointees.
Our nation has been in existence for (17) and lawyers have been this nation’s aristocracy since its (18) . Our system works, but do we really want to have a single profession (19) our nation. Specifically, do we want to have the legal profession in charge (20) , that is something to think about.